[
Instances of voter fraud are extremely rare.
I respectfully disagree with that.
I suspect that voter fraud is rampant in the big city Democrat strongholds of this country. It happen in Chicago in 1960 when the Democrats delivered enough votes to get Kennedy elected and I think it continues today.
We saw indication of it in 2012 when several Democrat precincts delivered more votes for Obama than there were registered voters.
Just because the Democrat controlled government of these big cities don't investigate and prosecute Democrat voter fraud don't mean there isn't any. I think it is rampant.
1) This isn't 1960.
2) One city does not elect a President.
3) IIRC, those 2012 reports were flawed.
4) While fraud does exist, it's rare because it's against several state and federal laws. While Democrats may protect Democrats and Republicans protect Republicans, the fact remains when offices change hands, if there was fraud, the new party would prosecute....if there was anything there. Example; several loudmouthed Democrats claim Bush "stole" the election in 2000. If this was true, then why didn't Obama and the gang prosecute in 2008? My guess is because there was nothing to prosecute.