Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Sign Bill Banning Social Media ‘Deplatforming’

[dblack]

But I suspect, after that falls flat, you'll want more

There is still breaking them up like StandardOil into many small companies

Exactly. More big government intervention.

 

[dblack]

I'm not the one whining to serve me by exposing private companies to business ending lawsuits. That would be the guy staring at you in the mirror.

DBlack assures us it won't hurt them at all

See post #1017

I don't think it will. And clearly, your aim is to hurt them. For banning you dear leader.

 

[Mac-7]

And clearly, your aim is to hurt them

no more or less than their aim is to hurt me

 

[dblack]

And clearly, your aim is to hurt them

no more or less than their aim is to hurt me

I'm sure you're on their most wanted list.

 

[Mac-7]

I'm sure you're on their most wanted list.

Since I am a trump voter you can bet the rent money on it

And I'm not even on FaceBook or Twitter

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Liberals are so frail that differing opinions have to be fakely labeled as “lie” so that some bizarre justification can be extruded to remove the opinion from sight or sound and libbies can curl up in their safe space.

Saying Trump won and the election was stolen is not an opinion. It’s an objectively and demonstrably false statement. An opinion is inherently subjective.
Saying, “all beef franks are the best franks” is an opinion.

 

[Uncensored2008]

What do you think would happen if 230 were repealed?

The monopoly would get sued for the slander and defamation they publish.

Libertarians look to civil law as a means of private citizens dealing with private companies.

But the FascisTwat monopoly isn't really private, so you demand government protection of it.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Asshole Ron DeSantis Spews Out Freedom Killing Regulations like a Pez Dispenser!

So says the biased dem shill from Langley.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

No surprise only the resident shills of Langley that are paid to troll these boards were the only ones that liked the op of a fellow resident shill from Langley paid to troll at this site.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

CIA shill kissmy and the other langley shills that liked the op post love big tech and love thst censorship of government corruption,yeah baby.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Liberals are so frail that differing opinions have to be fakely labeled as “lie” so that some bizarre justification can be extruded to remove the opinion from sight or sound and libbies can curl up in their safe space.

Saying Trump won and the election was stolen is not an opinion. It’s an objectively and demonstrably false statement. An opinion is inherently subjective.
Saying, “all beef franks are the best franks” is an opinion.

Whatever you say shill.

 

[colfax_m]

no more or less than their aim is to hurt me

There is no aim to hurt you. Don’t be crazy.

 

[Mac-7]

is no aim to hurt you. Don’t be crazy.

The aim of FaceBook and Twitter is totally political and leftwing

So yes, they are trying to hurt trump voters

 

[Faun]

is no aim to hurt you. Don’t be crazy.

The aim of FaceBook and Twitter is totally political and leftwing

LOL

Even if that were true, and it's not, that would be within their rights.

 

[dblack]

The monopoly would get sued for the slander and defamation they publish.

Libertarians look to civil law as a means of private citizens dealing with private companies.

But the FascisTwat monopoly isn't really private, so you demand government protection of it.

Fascists!!!! Nazis!!

You're a very silly person. And you're not any paying attention. I'm in favor of removing 230. It won't change anything anyway. I'm just curious why you are. It obviously has nothing to do with libertarian principles. And it's not about a "level playing" field - they'll still be able to ban Trump. Near as I can tell it's just about petty revenge. And kind of pathetic in that sense.

 

[Mac-7]

Even if that were true, and it's not, that would be within their rights.

Immunity from lawsuits is a privilege not a right

And it can be changed by congress

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sure man. Coming from you and your inverted Trumpster "logic", I'll take it as high praise.

Trump comes the closest to the ideals of Rothbard of any president the nation has ever had.

But your Beloved Biden does come close to Mao and Hitler, so we know why you love him.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Liberals are so frail that differing opinions have to be fakely labeled as “lie” so that some bizarre justification can be extruded to remove the opinion from sight or sound and libbies can curl up in their safe space.

Saying Trump won and the election was stolen is not an opinion. It’s an objectively and demonstrably false statement. An opinion is inherently subjective.
Saying, “all beef franks are the best franks” is an opinion.

Whatever you say shill.

Whatever you say shill.

I say... objective reality. You should try it sometime.

 

[colfax_m]

Sure man. Coming from you and your inverted Trumpster "logic", I'll take it as high praise.

Trump comes the closest to the ideals of Rothbard of any president the nation has ever had.

But your Beloved Biden does come close to Mao and Hitler, so we know why you love him.

Trump has displayed so many fascist traits, it’s not even funny. Like, not funny. Bad. Really bad.

 

[danielpalos]

It is protected under our First Amendment if it is political and especially when a petition for redress of grievances.