colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
You’re disgusting.Ha! Show me where it says that the relevant law and I’ll take your point seriously.Go ahead and describe what’s so different.It’s providing something of monetary value to allow them to vote. No different.Driving someone to the polls allows them to vote.Joe is going to raise Bloomberg’s taxes. He’s not getting a pass.That plutocrat is using his money to help people.Always about race. Bloomberg is trying to influence an election maybe in violation to state law.
Sorry, but if you lose your vote via felonious behavior it's on you to pay back what the judge says for you to pay back.
That was not the intent of the voters who voted to restore the voting rights of felons.
It will be fun to watch you guys go after Bloomberg... his lawyers will crush you like bugs.
It's comical watching you cheer for the very plutorcrat type you usually bitch about.
But I expect a complete lack of moral fiber and consistency from you.
Why does that upset you? I thought the conservatives of the country liked charity?
Joe rails against plutocrats but gives Bloomberg a pass, it's called hypocrisy.
So why are you so scared that more people get to vote?
It's about the law, and Bloomberg may have broken it.
You only want them to vote because Bloomberg is paying them off to vote for Biden.
There’s zero evidence any law was broken. You’re only accusing Bloomberg of breaking the law because they may vote Biden.
It’s not illegal to pay someone’s fines.
It's illegal to influence someone's vote via monetary gain.
Bloomberg pays for the fees allowing the person to vote
Bloomberg supports Biden.
Not too hard to connect the dots here.
Is it illegal for me to drive an elderly person to a polling place?
That's not paying them (or paying off their debts) to allow them to vote.
Very different, and of usually very different overall value.
As for the value, no doubt it’s different, however the law doesn’t say anything about the overall value. So according to the law, that would be irrelevant. It’s as illegal to give someone five dollars to go vote as five thousand.
Many bribery laws allow small gifts on under say $25 in value, this allows things like pens and bags at trade shows to be given to public employees without risk of bribery charges being brought about.
The concept is the same here, plus there is the overall monetary value of the service or payoff. A $15 ride is not paying off $5000 in restitution.
But keep defending shady practices because it helps your side, you dried up old miserable SJW twat.
It’s not shady, you just don’t like that some people have a chance to vote against Trump
Let the investigation figure that one out.
And if they were all leaning Trump i'm sure you would be against it you no life cumsucking SJW shill.
You're a hack.
You just make shit up and then act really nasty when called out.