- Apr 5, 2010
- Reaction score
You ignore even the chance of the law being broken because it might swing Florida to Biden.The derangement is on your side kiddo. You can’t even admit that you have no idea what corrupt influence means because you don’t want people to vote that might vote for a Democrat.Clarity comes from not being a TDS half tard like you are.It only seems like that because you’re brain is rotten by years of Republican hatred.The law prevents corruptly influencing a person's vote.Bloomberg clearly did not break the law. There should be a criminal investigation of Florida Republicans.The law is pretty clear, and it seems Bloomberg broke it, time for an investigation.If you know anything about the law, you see that there’s nothing illegal about it.And you are covering for possibly illegal behavior because it suits your interest.Not corrupt influence, no. It’s extremely meaningful. You wouldn’t constantly be saying “he’s paying for them” or “he’s buying votes” if it weren’t meaningful. You’re language shifts back and forth because you don’t have any fucking idea what you’re talking about and are just whining because you don’t want people to vote.That is meaningless when it comes to the law in question. The term is corrupting influence.If you’re paying money in exchange for something, there is an agreement. That’s literally what the words mean.There doesn't have to be an agreement, there just has to be corrupting influence, and giving someone money to vote is about a big corrupting influence as you can get.But there’s no evidence that there is any agreement that the money is being exchanged for votes, therefore there is no evidence of a crime, therefore you’re proposing an investigation without probable cause.It's an investigation into a matter of money being paid in exchange for voting rights, which leads to votes.Then it’s an investigation without a predicate based on political bias.I'm not the one ignoring the language, you are. The investigation will come to it's conclusions when completed.What’s exposed is your ignorance of the language of the law.Nope, it's a valid question considering the wording of the election law referenced.Only in the mind of corrupt thugs like yourself who want to criminalize political support of a candidate.Plenty of reasons to have one.No predicate for an investigation.He being investigated for paying people's debt off so they can vote. That may be against a specific Florida Election Law.Yes, and he’s being “investigated” for being a Biden supporter. Which as we know in your thug circles makes him suspicious.Wow, talk about overreach. It's an investigation into a rich guy trying to buy votes for his candidate.No there’s not. Not with any information you’ve presented. Making these accusations is a corrupt attempt to scare people into not voting.What fabricating? There is a distinct possibility he broke Florida Election laws, and you want to sweep it under the rug.Fabricating accusations and alleging possible charges for legal actiis an attempt to dissuade those from voting out of fear and intimidation.Wow, justifying buying votes by calling opposition to it thuggery.
You really have nothing, do you?
Let the investigation figure it out, oh wait you are afraid of the investigation so you call for it not to happen.
How is the hack life, Hacky McHack-Hack? Hackigowa Hackitori?
As you said, this only scares you because you believe these individuals are going to vote Democratic.
The only reason you support this is BECAUSE you think they will vote Democratic.
Hacky takes it up the ass doo-dah doo-dah
Hacky take it up the ass, all dee doo dah day.
Anything else you say is spin.
Like you aren’t going to go after the people you’re accusing of accepting bribes. No one is that stupid.
The only thug here is you, denying that an investigation should even take place, because you want your cock-buddy Biden to win regardless of the cost.
Ignoring it out of hand is just showing how much of a hack you are, Hackidan Hackwong.
Thugs like you favor abusing government authority to swing an election. Putin would be proud.
And btw, I got mild OCD AND hate your fucking guts so I can keep this up FOR FUCKING EVER.
You deny that someone paying for you to be able to vote again, who supports a given candidate, does not have ANY influence on who you might vote for?
it's all the same thing, it's all buying votes, it's all corrupt influence.
But you don’t know anything so you make shit up to intimidate others from engaging in the democratic process.
I guess you think Rich people are above the law when they spend their cash doing something you approve of, i.e. buy votes.
Sorry, but paying up to $1500 so they can vote sure seems like influencing how they will vote if the person paying clearly supports one Candidate.