Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
And you have no evidence of intent. No evidence of influence. No evidence of corruption.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
And you have no evidence of intent. No evidence of influence. No evidence of corruption.
And that's why they have to investigate.
So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
And you have no evidence of intent. No evidence of influence. No evidence of corruption.
And that's why they have to investigate.
No predicate for investigation.
Failed to provide sufficient cause to suspect any corrupt influence has been exerted.So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
And you have no evidence of intent. No evidence of influence. No evidence of corruption.
And that's why they have to investigate.
No predicate for investigation.
Plenty of reason for an investigation. Motive, actions, money changing hands, voters being influenced due to it.
Failed to provide sufficient cause to suspect any corrupt influence has been exerted.So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
And you have no evidence of intent. No evidence of influence. No evidence of corruption.
And that's why they have to investigate.
No predicate for investigation.
Plenty of reason for an investigation. Motive, actions, money changing hands, voters being influenced due to it.
This is merely criminalizing political support for an opposing candidate. How very Stalin-esque of you.
And you’ve failed to provide any reason to suspect he’s paying them to do anything.Failed to provide sufficient cause to suspect any corrupt influence has been exerted.So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
And you have no evidence of intent. No evidence of influence. No evidence of corruption.
And that's why they have to investigate.
No predicate for investigation.
Plenty of reason for an investigation. Motive, actions, money changing hands, voters being influenced due to it.
This is merely criminalizing political support for an opposing candidate. How very Stalin-esque of you.
Not support, paying money to get them to vote for your candidate.
And you’ve failed to provide any reason to suspect he’s paying them to do anything.Failed to provide sufficient cause to suspect any corrupt influence has been exerted.So he doesn't actually know how they'll vote.So the answer is that Bloomberg doesn't know how anyone's going to vote.How does he know how they will vote?Refusing to answer the question again.How does Bloomberg know who they will vote for?They could also sprout antlers and fart unicorn dust.
They could. Frankly, it would make about as much sense for anyone voting for Trump.
They are getting their fines paid so they CAN vote, and they know who is paying the fines for them, and they know who said person supports.
None of which compels them to vote for that person.
The reality is, the REpublicans are the ones who don't want ex-felons to vote because they know they will vote Democratic. It's just another form of voter suppression.
Bullshit.
And the only reason Bloomie is paying their fines and restitution is because he knows they will vote democrat, and he's paying for it.
Then why buy their voting rights back?
Such a snowflake.
He knows how most of them will vote, that's why he's buying their vote.
And again you use the term snowflake wrong, twat.
A snowflake refuses to answer questions because they’re too scared of the implications of the answers.
He doesn't have to know how every single one votes, he just knows they are more likely to vote for Biden because Republicans are always harder on criminals.
What am I scared of?
Do you agree that criminals are more likely to vote for Democrats? Why so?
Is it because they are usually weak on crime?
Sure, felons are more likely to vote Democratic, but as you said that may very well be because of policy disagreements which is certainly not Bloomberg's fault, therefore he cannot be held liable for the actions of Republicans.
As we can see, this isn't about criminality, it's about Republican fear of being voted out of office.
He assumes they will vote democrat, otherwise why is he paying for them to vote?
No, it's about Bloomberg potentially breaking the law trying to buy votes for Democrats.
And of course, as always, go fuck yourself with Kamala's extra large dildo.
How can he be accused of buying votes if he doesn't know who they're voting for?
He can't. You're entire accusation crumbles.
He's betting on them voting democrat, why else would he pay for them to get their voting rights back?
Again, why is he paying for them to be able to vote?
He can “bet on” whatever he wants. Given he doesn’t know who is voting for who, it cannot be considered buying votes.
His intent is for them to vote for Biden. Most of them will. That's a plausible chain showing corrupting influence on their vote, and that is what the Statue prohibits.
For starters, you can't prove intent. Second, you can't prove influence. Third, you can't prove CORRUPT influence.
This is just Republicans shitting their pants because they thought they were going to prevent people from voting and now that they might be able to, are worried that those people are going to be pissed at them.
proving intent is a major component of any criminal prosecution. proving influence is part of bribery prosecutions, and proving it is corrupt is part of the whole fighting corruption thing.
And you have no evidence of intent. No evidence of influence. No evidence of corruption.
And that's why they have to investigate.
No predicate for investigation.
Plenty of reason for an investigation. Motive, actions, money changing hands, voters being influenced due to it.
This is merely criminalizing political support for an opposing candidate. How very Stalin-esque of you.
Not support, paying money to get them to vote for your candidate.
Did you forget about Bloomberg’s wink wink nudge nudge which somehow constitutes a quid pro quo?It's going to take more than wink wink, nudge nudge to declare something illegal.1. I pay $$ in the hundreds and thousands for you to vote
2. You know I support Biden
3, wink wink, nudge nudge.
That's how influence peddling works, legal or illegal.
He's giving them money to vote, and he openly supports one of the candidates. One doesn't have to be a rocket scientist to go from A to B.
Unless of course one has ones head up their own ass due to TDS.
You definitely have TDS. You sound so stupid. He is giving them the opportunity to vote. There are no guarantees they will or who they will vote for.
There was nothing wrong with what Bloomberg did. He made a blanket gift. Not one based on party affiliation or loyalty. Trumpers are only crying foul because their attempt at cheating again has been foiled.It's only buying votes if he is paying for the vote.
I mean, hypothetically, all these people who had their fees paid off could still vote Republican... Can't see why they would, but it's a mystery to me why anyone making less than six figures votes Republican.
The real problem here is the people of Florida CLEARLY made their wishes known by voting to restore the voting rights of felons not convicted of violent offenses. The GOP Legistlature cheated to prevent them from voting, and Bloomberg is just helping them restore their rights.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Bloomberg pays for them to have their voting rights restored
Bloomberg supports Biden
Wink, Wink, nudge, nudge.
You need more than that.
That's what an investigation is for.
I'm sure if some lawbreaking is found you will find an excuse for it.
There is no lawbreaking involved. The facts are clear. There is no need for a investigation. This is nothing but harassment.
1. I pay for you to vote
2. I support Biden
3. Wink Wink, Nudge Nudge.
Go ahead and describe what’s so different.It’s providing something of monetary value to allow them to vote. No different.Driving someone to the polls allows them to vote.Joe is going to raise Bloomberg’s taxes. He’s not getting a pass.That plutocrat is using his money to help people.Always about race. Bloomberg is trying to influence an election maybe in violation to state law.
Sorry, but if you lose your vote via felonious behavior it's on you to pay back what the judge says for you to pay back.
That was not the intent of the voters who voted to restore the voting rights of felons.
It will be fun to watch you guys go after Bloomberg... his lawyers will crush you like bugs.
It's comical watching you cheer for the very plutorcrat type you usually bitch about.
But I expect a complete lack of moral fiber and consistency from you.
Why does that upset you? I thought the conservatives of the country liked charity?
Joe rails against plutocrats but gives Bloomberg a pass, it's called hypocrisy.
So why are you so scared that more people get to vote?
It's about the law, and Bloomberg may have broken it.
You only want them to vote because Bloomberg is paying them off to vote for Biden.
There’s zero evidence any law was broken. You’re only accusing Bloomberg of breaking the law because they may vote Biden.
It’s not illegal to pay someone’s fines.
It's illegal to influence someone's vote via monetary gain.
Bloomberg pays for the fees allowing the person to vote
Bloomberg supports Biden.
Not too hard to connect the dots here.
Is it illegal for me to drive an elderly person to a polling place?
That's not paying them (or paying off their debts) to allow them to vote.
Very different, and of usually very different overall value.
As for the value, no doubt it’s different, however the law doesn’t say anything about the overall value. So according to the law, that would be irrelevant. It’s as illegal to give someone five dollars to go vote as five thousand.
Giving someone the opportunity to vote is not the same thing. It is only illegal to pay someone to vote for a particular candidate.
This is practically paying someone to vote for a particular candidate.
