Anguille
Bane of the Urbane
- Mar 8, 2008
- 17,910
- 2,266
- 48
S'matter? That scenario hit a little too close to home, Pinky?
No. But your snarky comments suggest you'd be delighted it it did. Are you this bitter in real life?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
S'matter? That scenario hit a little too close to home, Pinky?
No. But your snarky comments suggest you'd be delighted it it did. Are you this bitter in real life?
Not in the least, but I'm always happy when evil people get what's coming to them...
Whatever, Troll.
Of course I won't explain that because I think there is no real justification for it. I think it's wrong that men have to pay child support for kids they would have chosen to abort if it had been their choice to do so.
You make a bunch of assumptions about my opinions without having any idea what they are.
They already are human beings.
Well, perhaps... or perhaps I construed correctly. But either way. I think I said when McCain first made his statement about why Tom Ridge would probably be a no-go (I don't remember which thread) but after his appearance on Hardball, he could crawl across the floor on hot coals and I wouldn't vote for him.
I think that I've always said it's a function of what one's priorities are and whose ox is being gored. McCain's appearance on Hardball gored my ox.
That said, on the flip side, Obama's given me no indication he intends to impose any of Rev Wright's insanity on us. I think you know that if I thought he agreed with, particularly certain things that Wright said, that I couldn't vote for him no matter who was running against him and I'd more likely stay home. But if Obama's gored *your* ox, then you have every right to vote accordingly (not that you need me to tell you that).
On the other hand, we've been given every indication that McCain intends to make at least certain concessions to Hagee and his ilk. Why should I disbelieve him or pretend I didn't see what I know I saw?
yea... but what you WONT admit here is that once fertalized the egg becomes just as autonomous from YOUR body until the ZYGOTE (mixed genetics) attaches to the lining of the uterine wall. PAST tense, right?
![]()
indeed, life isn't always fair in the workforce either. So, get your ass back in the kitchen and make me some PIE!
already took that shot in the chest, dude. She whips out a guilt trip that a man would consider his child a burden. Apparently, a man's input is no good past the zipper.. unless we are talking about alimony or child support.
What does all this blather have to do about the topic? Nothing, huh? Duly noted. THIS is what I'm talking about. This is PURE defelction from the topic.
If you want to piss on McCain, piss on for what he IS doing ... pandering for votes. Up to this point, his opinions have amazing been pretty much the same as mine and guess what .... once he gets those votes it'll be back to business as usual. There is NO indication -- NONE whatsover -- that he is going to make concessions to anyone.
Who are YOU trying to kid? When was the last time McCain was accused of making concessions? He's as inflexible as tungsten steel, so GMAFB.
Conversely, the simple formula used for going to church is belief in what the church preaches. Obama has attended Wiright's church for 20 or so years. But of course that glaring, neon sign isn't nay kind of indicator, is it?![]()
The topic is the hypocrisy of those who support the state interceding on behalf of children because their safety takes priority over parent's rights but turning right around squealing your rights come first when it's to YOUR convenience.
Wow. I never read this perspective before. Help me to understand it by commenting on whether you agree with my example.
A man and a woman have sex and the woman gets pregnant. They talk about whether or not they want the baby. The father says. No. I dont want it. I want you to abort it. Ill give you half the cost if you want the abortion. You can deliver the baby if you want to but if you do, I am not giving you child support.
Is that fair enough? Do I understand your position? If so, it would sure get many irresponsible, self-centered, and opportunistic fathers off the preverbal hook.
![]()
YOU are calling someone else a troll?
![]()
By whose definition?
IMO, once a child is born it is alive. Neither the mother or father has the option to ignore it at that point. But if the father choose not to support it, I'd be more inclined to let him have his way because a reluctant father is more damaging than no father at all.
Wow. I never read this perspective before. Help me to understand it by commenting on whether you agree with my example.
A man and a woman have sex and the woman gets pregnant. They talk about whether or not they want the baby. The father says. No. I dont want it. I want you to abort it. Ill give you half the cost if you want the abortion. You can deliver the baby if you want to but if you do, I am not giving you child support.
Is that fair enough? Do I understand your position? If so, it would sure get many irresponsible, self-centered, and opportunistic fathers off the preverbal hook.