"Flaming & Polarizing thread titles" now allowed in Politics sub- forum?

[Dot Com]

I meant to ask this months ago but this easyt65 hacktard is spitting them out as fast as he can. The guy is a classic example of someone w/ CDS.

Bad Day For Hillary: More E-Mails She Said Didn't Exist Surfaces, & Benghazi Report Rips Her & Barry

I'm not and will not be a Hillary- supporter but infantile threads, day after day, like the ones posted by easyt65 drag the forum down into the grade school, playground- level. Seriously

 

[Pumpkin Row]

To be fair, if they weren't allowed, they'd have stopped Guno from making threads sometime ago.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I meant to ask this months ago but this easyt65 hacktard is spitting them out as fast as he can. The guy is a classic example of someone w/ CDS.

Bad Day For Hillary: More E-Mails She Said Didn't Exist Surfaces, & Benghazi Report Rips Her & Barry

I'm not and will not be a Hillary- supporter but infantile threads, day after day, like the ones posted by easyt65 drag the forum down into the grade school, playground- level. Seriously

Does the title lie?

 

[Zander]

I meant to ask this months ago but this easyt65 hacktard is spitting them out as fast as he can. The guy is a classic example of someone w/ CDS.

Bad Day For Hillary: More E-Mails She Said Didn't Exist Surfaces, & Benghazi Report Rips Her & Barry

I'm not and will not be a Hillary- supporter but infantile threads, day after day, like the ones posted by easyt65 drag the forum down into the grade school, playground- level. Seriously

Tissue?

 

[Picaro]

Most threads in the Fever Swamps are astro-turfing partisan lunacy. Properly policing them would mean maybe two new threads a month being started in them.

 

[Dot Com]

So I guess the Politics sub-forum rules are "optional". Understood

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So I guess the Politics sub-forum rules are "optional". Understood

I asked a question, does the title lie? Yes or NO?

 

[NLT]

I'm not and will not be a Hillary- supporter but infantile threads, day after day, like the ones posted by easyt65 drag the forum down into the grade school, playground- level. Seriously

ban yourself then

 

[Dot Com]

So I guess the Politics sub-forum rules are "optional". Understood

I asked a question, does the title lie? Yes or NO?

thats not the issue doofus-in-residence. Polarizing verbiage is. Did you even read the rules bro? In the branch of service I served-in, we were taught to read everything carefully and fully comprehend it before shooting-off at the mouth. Just sayin...

Seriously though, you're almost as bad as him w/ your ODS/CDS

 

[Toro]

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So I guess the Politics sub-forum rules are "optional". Understood

I asked a question, does the title lie? Yes or NO?

thats not the issue doofus-in-residence. Polarizing verbiage is. Did you even read the rules bro? In the branch of service I served-in, we were taught to read everything carefully and fully comprehend it before shooting-off at the mouth. Just sayin...

Seriously though, you're almost as bad as him w/ your ODS/CDS

So the title is IN FACT the truth. Thanks for playing.

 

[Dot Com]

So I guess the Politics sub-forum rules are "optional". Understood

I asked a question, does the title lie? Yes or NO?

thats not the issue doofus-in-residence. Polarizing verbiage is. Did you even read the rules bro? In the branch of service I served-in, we were taught to read everything carefully and fully comprehend it before shooting-off at the mouth. Just sayin...

Seriously though, you're almost as bad as him w/ your ODS/CDS

So the title is IN FACT the truth. Thanks for playing.

Topic. Stay on it. "Polarizing thread titles" has nothing to do w/ whether its true or not rw hack boi

Stop wasting everyone's time w/ your low to non-existent reading comprehension skills