Flagging trump in the Epstein files

It's funny how you all have been fed this question to ask. Not one of you has an original thought in your heads.

As brainless parrots, it did not occur to you that Epstein was arrested in July 2019. That means Trump had the Epstein files for a year and a half before the election.

He could have released the Epstein files and ruined Biden's chances.

Why didn't he?

Biden had them before the 2024 election.
Why didn't he release them to get Kamala elected?
 
Trump is hiding the files for the same reason Biden hid the files. So you can answer your own question about Trump by answering it about Biden.
The Biden question is deliberately meant to deflect attention away from Trump. It is desperate misdirection for creduloous rubes like yourself.

Finally, no one is hiding anything. There are no "Epstein Files".

Occam's Razor. Pam Bondi lied.
 
Biden had them before the 2024 election.
Why didn't he release them to get Kamala elected?
Trump had them before the 2020 election. Why didn't he release them to defeat Biden?

I'm sure if you think REALLY, REALLY hard, you'll figure it out.

Maybe. I'm not confident in your critical thinking skills at all.
 
Trump had them before the 2020 election. Why didn't he release them to defeat Biden?

I'm sure if you think REALLY, REALLY hard, you'll figure it out.

Maybe. I'm not confident in your critical thinking skills at all.

I guess Biden wasn't in them in 2020.
Just like Trump wasn't in them in 2024.
 
The Biden question is deliberately meant to deflect attention away from Trump. It is desperate misdirection for creduloous rubes like yourself.

Finally, no one is hiding anything. There are no "Epstein Files".
That's a bizarre statement. Of course there are Epstein files.

1753301080343.webp
I think you mean something else, like "the Epstein files were not complete," or "there is no list of Epstein's clients that has not been destroyed, purged, or heavily redacted," or "there are no files revealing anything that has not already been made public."

Those are reasonable positions that fit with reality, if that's what you meant.

Occam's Razor. Pam Bondi lied.
Okay.

About what?

You're almost there. Keep trying!
I take it you are playing this childish game in order to avoid stating your position and being challenged to defend it?

Are you related to Unkotare, by chance?
 
Last edited:
I can't figure this out either. Look at the lengths they went to try and get Trump, but they don't use Epstein against him?
They didn't want to see Bill Clinton die in jail.
 
Bidens failed prosecution? It failed as it should have. Now Trump is president and exposing all of your malfeasance. You sure are stupid
Let me explain something to your hopeless MAGA simp ass that you obviously don't realize....

Presidents do not interfere in DOJ investigations. Trump is the only president to ever do this shit......because he is hopelessly corrupt and just a horrible human being.

I genuinely don't expect you to understand any of this.....after all, you are a dirt stupid, uneducated, unsophisticated MAGA bumpkin. You actually like Trump's corruption because you are as fucked-up as he is.
 
lol...you just cant help yourself...
Well, Harry, some of us actually care about adult men ******* kids, and some, like OhPleaseJustQuit pretend to care about it. Until it's go time. Then it's "b-b-but what about Bill Clinton?!? while they're whining like little bitches.

No one gives a **** if Bill Clinton is in the files. He left office 25 years ago. Trump is POTUS now, and if he's in there as a kid-****** he needs to be impeached and convicted. Don't you agree?
 
Biden really fucked up.

He could have released the Epstein file and killed Trump's chances.

Why didn't he?
You pedophile defenders care more about why Biden didn't release them than you care about Trump not releasing them.

Why is that?
 
Trump is obviously guilty of something.

He thought this was all over in 2019....now it's coming back to bite him in the ass in a big way.
Like the meme says, if Trump wasn't in the Epstein Files he would be selling them on Truth Social. Probably in a faux leather bound binder.
 
15th post
So Mods merged my thread on ths into another one and then closed that.

That's why I'm bringing this back up with a new OP.

Apparently the review process was long, involved, and chaotic, Actually keep hundreds of agents locked down in the building for days on end and with fluctuating parameters. There is an actual spreadsheet of instances trump was named in the files, and video instruction on what to put in it. And if they need a spreadsheet, I can only assume there were many, because you don't put 5 or 10 things in a spreadsheet.

At first, the analysts were told to mark nothing. This was roundly rejected by the analysts, who were then told to not think about it as releasing the information - including victims names - to the public, but to think about it as releasing it to the Attorney General. It was assumed that Bondi and Patel wanted all the information, including the victim’s names and information. Analysts were told that what would be released would be solely up to Pam Bondi. Many feared that the victim’s information would be released or used for nefarious purposes. Eventually, lawyers from the Department of Justice were assigned to the project to oversee what was being flagged for redaction.

That changed pretty quickly and the analysts were next told to mark the victim’s names for redaction. Then soon after that, they were told to mark all other Personal Identifiable Information (PII) such as social security numbers and addresses. Then they were told to mark all descriptions of illicit acts for redaction. Then finally, they were instructed to keep a spreadsheet of instances when Trump was mentioned. After the spreadsheets of mentions of Trump were handed in, they were stitched together in one master list. I was not able to learn how many mentions of Donald Trump were on that master list.




Look, if trump were implicated, bidens DOJ would have leaked this to the press to hurt trumps election. There are only 2 reasons he didnt: 1) because there is no evidence against trump, or 2) there was implication of some prominent democrats that they didnt want to get out into the open.
 
Back
Top Bottom