I'd be equally content to see your (or someone else's) sound, rigorous inductive argument based on accepted theory(s).
when China switched to capitalism they instantly eliminated 40% of the entire planets poverty. Before, the Chinese were starving to death and 60 million died. Now they can afford a whole lot of health care thanks to capitalism. Do you understand??
Yes, I understand quite well what you wrote. I understood it the first time you wrote it. I knew then that it also is completely irrelevant to this discussion. Why?
- The circumstance of the Chinese event pattern you identified is that of a nation, China, going from no capitalism to comparatively unbridled capitalism. No similarly dramatic transition is even possible in the U.S.
- The poverty metric you note is in fact that of China, which has something like 20% of the planet's population, and it's the result of the transformation noted in the prior bullet point. That's all well and good, but
Additionally, I am all but certain you have no idea of
how China's healthcare system works. I can assure you it is not a
laissez-faire industry, it's not even close.
I'm wondering now whether you understand what I'm asking for. Now I don't know why the immigration paper I linked didn't give you a general sense of the nature of information I've asked for, but for whatever reason it did not. I will try one more time to clarify what it is I've asked you to share with us....
In your OP you wrote:
All we have to do is switch our health care system from socialism to capitalism and use the saving to pay off the debt. We'd save about $3 trillion by switching to capitalism so entire national debt could be paid off in 6 years
I responded by saying, "Okay...I'll bite. Show me the math that makes that be so. Be sure to include how the needed trillions of dollars transfer from privately held accounts to the national treasury so the debt can be paid."
You wrote in response to my post:
as capitalism brings down cost $3 trillion a year govt can raise taxes that amount to pay of the national debt in 6 years. When debt is paid it can drop taxes $3 trillion a year.
Now I don't know what makes you think the U.S. is not a capitalist nation such that it could "switch to capitalism," but, frankly, I don't care because that's just a line of discussion I'm not even going to entertain having with you, much less have.
The math I'm looking for, however, doesn't depend on whether the U.S. is or isn't a capitalist country. The math I'm asking for is the math that shows the following:
- The U.S.-specific health care transformation events that will in turn save $3 trillion when current total U.S. healthcare spending is $3.2 trillion.
- A summary level detailing of where you think $3 trillion in savings is going to come.
- The figures and accompanying rationale that backs-up your projected savings.
Simply put, I'm not about to accept your $3 trillion in savings assertion merely because you say it is so. If what you say is indeed plausible, it seems to me you need to schedule a meeting with Trump, and some people in Congress, because I can assure you, they aren't aware of any plan or approach that will yield savings on the scale you've claimed.