Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

[munkle]

This particular article deals with WTC 7 but if Seven was wired for demolition then they all were.


FSJA Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas: "Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?

WTC 7, the third high-rise to collapse on 9/11, was located about 100 yards (91.4m) north of WTC 1, was a 47-story steel building, stood 610 ft. (186 m),

fireandsafetyjournalamericas.com

"Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition."



Firefighters Call 9/11 an Inside Job - "Calling Out Bravo-7" Documentary.

 

[shockedcanadian]

This is in Current Events or is it more accurately placed in Conspiracy section?

 

[toobfreak]

Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition.

Nah, the intense heat was enough to make critical floor beams sag allowing them to pull away from their moorings, allowing a floor to collapse dropping straight down on the one below, also compromised. This set forth a chain reaction where now, the total floor load bearing weight was exceeded and with increasing weight built up and inertia, the collapsed floor section dropped down taking another and another, and in an instant, you had runaway building collapse.

 

[munkle]

Nah, the intense heat was enough to make critical floor beams sag allowing them to pull away from their moorings, allowing a floor to collapse dropping straight down on the one below, also compromised. This set forth a chain reaction where now, the total floor load bearing weight was exceeded and with increasing weight built up and inertia, the collapsed floor section dropped down taking another and another, and in an instant, you had runaway building collapse.

There is no such thing as a runaway building collapse.

 

[toobfreak]

There is no such thing as a runaway building collapse.

Sure there is. It is called cascade failure and once one floor collapsed, the subsequent floor, weakened, was loaded with twice its normal weight so had to collapse, leading to a chain of floor collapses. This was all covered in detail in documentaries on failures in how the WTC was designed 20 years ago.

Basically, the outside shell of the building was free standing as was the central tower and all the floors did in the design was connect the outside shell to the center tower keeping it stable and from twisting.

Once the floors started failing, collapse was inevitable. Seems one of the key oversights was the fact that in a large jumbo jet explosion (they only expected small, private planes to collide with the Towers), the initial fuel explosion blew off the spray coating which was supposed to protect keep floor beams from exposure to fire and heat.

 

[munkle]

Sure there is. It is called cascade failure and once one floor collapsed, the subsequent floor, weakened, was loaded with twice its normal weight so had to collapse, leading to a chain of floor collapses. This was all covered in detail in documentaries on failures in how the WTC was designed 20 years ago.

Basically, the outside shell of the building was free standing as was the central tower and all the floors did in the design was connect the outside shell to the center tower keeping it stable and from twisting.

Once the floors started failing, collapse was inevitable. Seems one of the key oversights was the fact that in a large jumbo jet explosion (they only expected small, private planes to collide with the Towers), the initial fuel explosion blew off the spray coating which was supposed to protect keep floor beams from exposure to fire and heat.

There is no such things as a cascade failure. That is why no high rise has ever collapsed to the ground in seconds until 9/11 unless they were prepped and wired to do so for months prior. Nor has it happened since.

Explosive Evidence at WTC Cited by Former CDI Employee

Did you know that 3 towers fell on 9/11? World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed on 9/11 after the Twin Towers but was never hit by a plane. How?...

www1.ae911truth.org

Tom Sullivan grew up with the son of Jack Loizeaux, president and founder of CDI,and a pioneer in the controlled demolitions industry. In an interview with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Sullivan stated:

"that he knew from the first day that the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 was a classic controlled implosion. Asked how he thought it might have been done he posited, “looking at the building it wouldn’t be a problem — once you gain access to the elevator shafts…then a team of expert loaders would have hidden access to the core columns and beams. The rest can be accomplished with just the right kind of explosives for the job. Thermite can be used as well.”

Sullivan said:

"I mean, come on, it was complete destruction. I've seen buildings fall like that for years -- that was the end game for me."

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[toobfreak]

That is why no high rise has ever collapsed to the ground in seconds until 9/11

That is because no other building has been hit by an exploding jumbo jet on the 70th floor with a latent design flaw.

unless they were prepped and wired to do so for months prior.

With explosives. Like a bomb. Like a 747 blowing up inside the building. And they did not collapse in seconds. It took about an hour after being hit by the jets for their structures to fail.

 

[Z99]

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

That is because no other building has been hit by an exploding jumbo jet on the 70th floor with a latent design flaw.


With explosives. Like a bomb. Like a 747 blowing up inside the building. And they did not collapse in seconds. It took about an hour after being hit by the jets for their structures to fail.

WTC 7 wasn't hit by a plane.

 

[sparky]

Ask why the FDNY was under gag order......~S~

 

[Soupnazi630]

This particular article deals with WTC 7 but if Seven was wired for demolition then they all were.


FSJA Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas: "Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?

WTC 7, the third high-rise to collapse on 9/11, was located about 100 yards (91.4m) north of WTC 1, was a 47-story steel building, stood 610 ft. (186 m),

fireandsafetyjournalamericas.com

"Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition."



Firefighters Call 9/11 an Inside Job - "Calling Out Bravo-7" Documentary.

This stupid crap is predicated on the building reaching free fall speed.

IT NEVER DID

 

[Soupnazi630]

Ask why the FDNY was under gag order......~S~

It was never iunder such an order

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no such thing as a runaway building collapse.

Yes there is

 

[sparky]

It was never iunder such an order

FF's are trained to recognize a potential collapse Mr Soup

They'll retreat to a 'surround and drown' position with the first indication of it

~S~

 

[Soupnazi630]

FF's are trained to recognize a potential collapse Mr Soup

They'll retreat to a 'surround and drown' position with the first indication of it

~S~

yes and they did that

 

[Moonglow]

This particular article deals with WTC 7 but if Seven was wired for demolition then they all were.


FSJA Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas: "Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?

WTC 7, the third high-rise to collapse on 9/11, was located about 100 yards (91.4m) north of WTC 1, was a 47-story steel building, stood 610 ft. (186 m),

fireandsafetyjournalamericas.com

"Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition."



Firefighters Call 9/11 an Inside Job - "Calling Out Bravo-7" Documentary.

Trump is an android.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Conspiracy theory abounds

 

[Innocynioc]

I am quite surprised that so many respondents appear to accept the official line that office fires caused the collapse of WTC 7 on 9-11. I was watching live TV news when Larry Silverstein, WTC owner, stated that the Fire Dept. had just informed him that they were going to "pull" WTC 7. "Pull" is the term building demolition contractors use to describe the controlled demolition of a building. This is only one of the discrepancies which belie the official account. Many more questions are covered in the five minute video which appears at:

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I am surprised at the many conspiracy nuts out there. Sad commentary on America.