rhodescholar
Gold Member
- Banned
- #1
Over the past few weeks I have been researching the work of Norman Finkelstein, much of which is not available on the web for some reason, to see EXACTLY what he claimed regarding the population counts and migration figures of the arab muslims from 1850-1948, and his claims about Joan Peters' alleged errors, and have not found much of anything that supports his claim that she was wrong.
Even the noted historian Porath was unable to debunk Peters' central claim that huge numbers of arabs moved/immigrated into the region from what is now Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt, as the census data proves that the only way their population could have increased so quickly was through immigration, not births.
I propose that Finkelstein's claims should be retracted, as there is a significant amount of data which does NOT support his claims, and that while large numbers of jews did immigrate into Israel from elsewhere - so did the arab muslims.
Even the noted historian Porath was unable to debunk Peters' central claim that huge numbers of arabs moved/immigrated into the region from what is now Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt, as the census data proves that the only way their population could have increased so quickly was through immigration, not births.
I propose that Finkelstein's claims should be retracted, as there is a significant amount of data which does NOT support his claims, and that while large numbers of jews did immigrate into Israel from elsewhere - so did the arab muslims.