As usual you are lying.
Elevator World Magazine -- May 1998
Does not discuss the elevator system in great detail. There are no elevator car dimensions other than 7.8 SQ. m
It is a very general and over all discription.
What I remember is you only divulged once, that you use silversteins plans and of course, ........ you are the only one that has a legible copy to do that.
Bwhaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaa, ....... agent.
Very good Chris!!!! You get a cookie. Now 7.8 Sq. m. is how many Sq. ft.? 84 square feet.
You have established nothing with your cointelpro nonsense. You are a deceptive manipulating agent who has been busted photoshopping images of WTC 2 to make them appear as WTC 1 to support your unevidenced position.
In order to attempt debunking the concrete core evidence, because there is no independently verified evidence for the steel core columns, gamy, being the internet stalker/debunker of concrete, takes the position that the elevators opened onto the lobby making the concrete core impossible.
WTC 2 did have a completely redesigned core to get away from the difficult to rent WTC 1 (34% vacant in 2001) which had elevators that could only be accessed from the inside of the core via hallways. At the lobby level, and only the lobby level, elevators went through the plane of the concrete core wall. "The Engineering and construction of the Twin Towers" , mostly about WTC 1, spent a minute or 3 talking about WTC 2 to explain how the elevators went through the bottom of a 1,350 foot concrete wall all the way along the long axis.
There were short walls running perpendicular to the long axis that were behind each interior box column, 24 of which surrounded the rectangular concrete tube from top to bottom. The elevator opening to the lobby entry of the elevator boxed out in the back as you walked in from the lobby to what was one of the walls parallel to the escalator running the long axis. WTC 2 also had twice as many hallways.
Wonder why W. Rodriguez hasn't resolved this issue and I've sent email and others have asked why he hasn't described the interior layout of WTC 1.
gamit had to make WTC 2 look like WTC 1. What was done is that WTC 1 exterior objects were placed on another layer from image showing the inside of the perimeter columns. That layer had the WTC 2 exterior through the windows made translucent then the objects of the WTC 1 exterior were positioned behind the perimeter walls.
This is a zoom of part of the image. Notice the proportions of the windows of the footbridge appearing to be outside. You see windows wider than they are tall.
Notice also that some of the footbridge windows show very faintly through the perimeter columns.
As a surveyor I instantly realized that the person that made the WTC exterior object did not understand perspectives well. The site plan shows the footbridge orientation. See the alignment of the "north bridge" west of WTC 1.
Such a angular relationship creates a large foreshortening of the true length of the line viewed, not the other way around as in the photoshopped image. I found a video and took a screen shot then posted at breakfornews.com in the thread the admin had started there to attempt a grand debunking of the concrete core evidence. stan and gam were the late players. Here is the proper appearance of the foot bridge from WTC 1.
Then the admin posts another badly shopped image in an attempt to salvage their debunking.
The width of a square never gets wider horizontally than it is tall vertically unless you view it from above. The windows of the foot bridge are square.
The sordid past of psyops concrete core stalker/debunkers having no independently verified evidence of the steel core columns FEMA told NIST were inside the towers is the reason gamy conducts this scam with the administrator of breakfornews.com
