FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[DiveCon]

There is also no evidence for steel core columns that is verified. the only verified evidence is for a concrete core, and only an agent would deny that. There are a number of agents, some now what they are doing some don't. You know what you are doing is supporting treason.

except you have posted proof of the steel columns, only you incorrectly call them something else

 

[Christophera]

If that is true you will be able to point out the supposed steel core columns in this 9-11 image of the WTC 2 core.

 

[DiveCon]

If that is true you will be able to point out the supposed steel core columns in this 9-11 image of the WTC 2 core.

yes, because the 1000 previous times it has been done it didnt change you, the 1001st time will be the charm

 

[Christophera]

Another lie, just like the other lie.

DI-asserts that steel has been pointed out on wtc 2 core pic.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2592230-post7403.html

D-posted 9-11 steel core before
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2563236-post7320.html

D-deny and lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2558644-post3137.html

D+Scanner anomalie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2554711-post7294.html

D-You post steel columns(?)
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2547786-post7282.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959274-post145.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959289-post146.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959580-post147.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959351-post3626.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959578-post3627.html

D-rebar
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2529236-post3044.html

D-lie/posted 9-11 steel core before
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2525612-post3033.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2568662-post3179.html

D
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068183-post334.html

D-agent
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104806-post4606.html

D-rebar & plan links
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2331142-post6209.html

F+D exposed
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104963-post4610.html

D-SPIRE
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2476643-post7012.html

F+obvious image
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2117758-post842.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1966323-post158.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1992513-post3708.html

F+
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068719-post4238.html

F+photo lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2093387-post4486.html

F+photo lie 2
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2094648-post4499.html

F+photoshop lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2097563-post650.html

F+plans lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290147-post1829.html

F+mayor microfilm lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2429160-post6710.html

F+plan lie confirm
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290723-post1832.html

F+buckling north tower
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2379590-post2345.html

F+buckling
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2380272-post2348.html



F+newsweek lied
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2431343-post6755.html

F+CAB trounces liar
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2431371-post6756.html

F+misinterp
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2456171-post2744.html

CAB proves it
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2458493-post2745.html

F&G-slam-plans-dimensions-spire
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2483938-post7050.html

PRETENDING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2484417-post2891.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2513013-post2999.html

 

[DiveCon]

Another lie, just like the other lie.

you are the proven liar
and deadbeat
pay your child support first, dipshit

 

[Gamolon]

You and your misinformation are exposed as nonsensical here.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2587498-post3237.html

I actually explain what you fail to.

you are a delusional LIAR

I showed independently verified evidence of a concrete core and explained what the hat truss bears on and the function of the moment frames.

Nope. Wrong yet again. Your concrete core COULDN'T have existed as I have proven. It was a physical impossibility based on your dimensions and location. This is proven by the simple fact that you can't provide a scaled drawing of your core with everything in it, at the lobby level.

gumout failed to do that.

Wrong again. Are you ever correct on anything?

gumjob thinks I care about the antenna.

No, you thought the mast base was the hat truss. A major mistake. This just shows that you know NOTHING of construction.

It used to be the elevators.

It still IS the elevators. You're just givining me more ammo to use against you every time you post.[/quote]

gumjob and divot have no evidence from independent sources substantiating the steel core columns and they are utter klutzes of cointelpro disinfo psyops.

Show us your evidence from Robertson and Domel agree with you that the concrete core's walls were 17' x 12' thick at it's base and tapered to 2' thick walls at the top. Can you please show us?

 

[Gamolon]

If that is true you will be able to point out the supposed steel core columns in this 9-11 image of the WTC 2 core.

Sorry. 3' thick concrete walls would not have withstood the tons of steel and machinery that crashed down around it.

Illogical.

 

[Gamolon]

If that is true you will be able to point out the supposed steel core columns in this 9-11 image of the WTC 2 core.

By the way, I don't see hallways on that supposed core. Why not? I also don't see the horizontal members you said were embedded in the concrete wall connecting the box columns to the interior elevator guide rail steel. There should be bunches of them sticking out. We shouldn't see smooth edges like we do.

I mean if we can see 6" diameter rebar from far away like you claim, we should see LARGER members protruding out the side of the supposed concrete core walls. They should have been at every floor. Where are they Chris?

 

[Gamolon]

You must think people are total idiots to suggest the hat truss was bearing on those spindly columns...

Please show me where I said that the hat truss was bearing on the external columns.

Here you said it.

The hat truss structure extended out to the perimeter columns and helped support the antenna. The hat truss helped distribute less than 10% of the perimeter column loads to the core columns. It started on the 108th floor and connected at 4 points on each face of the perimeter columns and then connected at the core.

Read my quote again dumbass. I said it was CONNECTED AT THE CORE. Why are you such a weasel? I also said the hat truss helped distribute less than 10% of the perimeter column loads TO the core.

Nice try moron.

 

[Christophera]

If that is true you will be able to point out the supposed steel core columns in this 9-11 image of the WTC 2 core.

By the way, I don't see hallways on that supposed core. Why not?

Try looking at the video, 9 seconds where I said they were seen. Where the 2 dark slots appear on the south side of the concrete core.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhNd48qx684&feature=related[/ame]

I also don't see the horizontal members you said were embedded in the concrete wall connecting the box columns to the interior elevator guide rail steel. There should be bunches of them sticking out. We shouldn't see smooth edges like we do.

When steel embedded in a concrete wall shears off it does so at the concrete.

I mean if we can see 6" diameter rebar from far away like you claim, we should see LARGER members protruding out the side of the supposed concrete core walls. They should have been at every floor. Where are they Chris?

Get you facts straight agent.

This is the only pic I've claimed there is 6" rebar. It was used int he foundation and some extened a short ways into the concrete core walls from the thick base wall. It is the tightly coiled steel on top.

This is 3" rebar, about 50 of them silhouetted.

Empty core area. No steel core columns seen EVER.

 

[Christophera]

Show us your evidence from Robertson and Domel agree with you that the concrete core's walls were 17' x 12' thick at it's base and tapered to 2' thick walls at the top. Can you please show us?

If you can NEVER show steel core column in the core, have no plans, no images from construction of needed diagonal braces, the steel core columns are a deception and the information from Robertson to Newsweek is accurate.

And, you are an agent working to protect the secret methods of mass murder.

 

[Christophera]

Please show me where I said that the hat truss was bearing on the external columns.

Here you said it.

The hat truss structure extended out to the perimeter columns and helped support the antenna. The hat truss helped distribute less than 10% of the perimeter column loads to the core columns. It started on the 108th floor and connected at 4 points on each face of the perimeter columns and then connected at the core.

Read my quote again dumbass. I said it was CONNECTED AT THE CORE. Why are you such a weasel? I also said the hat truss helped distribute less than 10% of the perimeter column loads TO the core.

Nice try moron.

If there is a truss over columns the truss is more than connected it is bearing on the columns, weasel.

 

[Gamolon]

and the information from Robertson to Newsweek is accurate.

Show me where Robertson and Domel say YOUR core existed. Show me where they say a rectangular concrete core, with 17' and 12' thick concrete walls at it's base and tapering to 2' thick at the top, existed.

Go on. Show everyone here that they verify YOUR core existed as you say it did.

I have a feeling it's going to be a LONG wait.

Until you provide these quotes, you have nothing and are ASSUMING that they agree with you.

I'll wait right here for the proof.

 

[Gamolon]

Here you said it.

Read my quote again dumbass. I said it was CONNECTED AT THE CORE. Why are you such a weasel? I also said the hat truss helped distribute less than 10% of the perimeter column loads TO the core.

Nice try moron.

If there is a truss over columns the truss is more than connected it is bearing on the columns, weasel.

Was the hat truss connected to the perimeter columns in your concrete core scenario? Just curious.

 

[Gamolon]

If that is true you will be able to point out the supposed steel core columns in this 9-11 image of the WTC 2 core.

By the way, I don't see hallways on that supposed core. Why not?

Try looking at the video, 9 seconds where I said they were seen. Where the 2 dark slots appear on the south side of the concrete core.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhNd48qx684&feature=related]YouTube - ‪WTC 2 collapse from the south, street level‬‎[/ame]

I didn't ask you about the video. Why don't we see the hallways in the picture you posted? If we can see 6" diameter rebar, I'm sure we can see larger hallways.

 

[Gamolon]

If that is true you will be able to point out the supposed steel core columns in this 9-11 image of the WTC 2 core.

By the way, I don't see hallways on that supposed core. Why not?

Try looking at the video, 9 seconds where I said they were seen. Where the 2 dark slots appear on the south side of the concrete core.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhNd48qx684&feature=related]YouTube - ‪WTC 2 collapse from the south, street level‬‎[/ame]

I also don't see the horizontal members you said were embedded in the concrete wall connecting the box columns to the interior elevator guide rail steel. There should be bunches of them sticking out. We shouldn't see smooth edges like we do.

When steel embedded in a concrete wall shears off it does so at the concrete.

That's some funny shit Chris!!!!!

 

[Christophera]

Your sense of humor does not appeal to these people.

Because you have NEVER shown this core on 9-11 whereas I have shown the concrete core from the beginning.

 

[DiveCon]

Your sense of humor does not appeal to these people.



Because you have NEVER shown this core on 9-11 whereas I have shown the concrete core from the beginning.

you have NEVER shown a concrete core
you should photos of dust clouds around the steel core and claim it is concrete, but when photos are not obscured by dust, it is plain to see that it was steel

 

[Gamolon]

Your sense of humor does not appeal to these people.

Because you have NEVER shown this core on 9-11 whereas I have shown the concrete core from the beginning.

I wonder what they think of you and your lies.

You still haven't shown me where Robertson and Domel say that they verify your core. I can't find ANYWHERE their description of a rectangular concrete core with 17' and 12' thick walls at it's base, tapering to 2' thick at the top.

Can you point out where they say that? I mean you keep spewing that the both verify your core right? Please point that out.

 

[Christophera]

Your sense of humor does not appeal to these people.

Because you have NEVER shown this core on 9-11 whereas I have shown the concrete core from the beginning.

I wonder what they think of you and your lies.

You still haven't shown me where Robertson and Domel say that they verify your core. I can't find ANYWHERE their description of a rectangular concrete core with 17' and 12' thick walls at it's base, tapering to 2' thick at the top.

Can you point out where they say that? I mean you keep spewing that the both verify your core right? Please point that out.

They do not need to give dimension and niether do I. The engineer of record identifies a concrete core and August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. does too at chap. 2.1.

So does Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

Please just verify there were steel core columns by posting an image of them in the core area that shows what is in this graphic from FEMA