Another contradiction by you Chris.
The twin towers had a rectangular cast concrete core structure formed by 4 rectangular cells. By watching a documentary in 1990 about the construction of the towers I learned the details needed to analyze what has happened and what photos show us.
I have met a civil engineer who remembers the documentary aired on another cable educational channel in 1995 and remembers the concrete core as they are shown above and labeled "ACTUAL CORE OF WTC TOWERS",
Demolition, the truth of 9-11
Here you claim that BOTH towers had the supposed "4 rectangular celled concrete core". No mention of the cores being "radically different" here. Could it be you changed your story to the cores being different because of the express elevator access issue I have brought up.
Hmmmm
Yes, that is text dating back 5 years. I will revise it. Elsewhere it is clarified.
And what changed you descriptions over those 5 years Chris? You supposedly got all your information from the documentary that discussed the cores in detail? Did they make revision to the video? That's a major change in your story to go from both towers having a four-celled concrete core that contained all elevators and stairwells to claiming that the cores of the towers were radically different.
Where did you get the information that the towers design was changed when the renters complained about elevator access? You say that WTC1's core had the core surrounding all the elevators and stairwells and that WTC2's core had the express elevators around the core.
Please provide this information that changed your description or you will be considered a liar.
Descriptions of the differences are very difficult because I'm not exactly sure at which elevations the core changed. I'm working on getting some good depcitions done that show the structure while also noting the unknowns.
No the core changes at different elevations? A while back you gave me dimensions and a drawing. Then you claimed the outside wall of the core tapered from 17' or 12' thick to 2' thick at the top of the towers and that the inside wall stayed plumb.
Now it changes?
Defeating your photoshopping and the the elevator issue you had to rely on with no evidence did require some thought. I knew the differences basically but hadn't thought much on exactly how the central pedastal of WTC 2 connected to the core walls with adequate strength.
Wait a minute! You mean you didn't know any of this before? How the **** is that possible? So basically you're just making this crap up as you go along?
Let me ask you this. Do you have any proof whatsoever on how the core of WTC2 is supposed to look or are you just guessing?
I already know the answer.
It is no wonder they built a prototype as a rocket launch pad at cape canaveral to test the design.
It seems I remember that it was determined to be stronger than the base of WTC 1 core despite having the openings.
A prototype for the tower's core? You have any proof whatsoever of that claim or are you justr making shit up again?
Finally the configuration was visible in the elevator entries of WTC 2 when observing video. The elevator car itself is about 8 feet back. There is about 4 feet alone just in the stainless doors
Your entire presentation is completely contradicted by independently verified evidence showing the concrete core. Someone working from memory, gathering up independent pieces of information in the vacuum created by the perpetrators with the post 9-11 psyops is bound to have some inconsistencies.
Find me one person who worked at the towers who says that the cores were different. Find me one person who worked at the towers who says the all the elevators of WTC1 were accessible from inside the core ONLY and that the express elevators were accessed from OUTSIDE the core. I have spoken with people who worked there and explained your garbage. They say you are full of shit and are completely out of you mind.
Why haven't you discussed this with anyone who worked there?
You're a damn coward. You KNOW the answer.
Is the engineer you speak of Harold Hill? Is that the one? I have recently written him and am awaiting his answer. I am waiting to see what he says about you using his supposed written declaration as proof that his cores existed as you claim. I am waiting to see what he says about the fact that you said he was afraid to say anything about the cores and yet you published his written declaration on a couple of public forums as support for your core and it being laden with explosives.
