That's the point. Trump and Barr said they're federal law enforcement agents. So you have official notice that federal agents are performing law enforcement in cammo uniforms without badges, identification or insignias on their "uniforms". Driving unmarked vehicles, and arresting people under color of law.
"Near" is a relative term dumbass. The street in front of the courthouse is near the courthouse.
I don't spin.
He's like a whirling dervish. He says the street is "near" a courthouse over which the feds have legal authority. His argument is that anything within sight of a court house (in the street, or even across the street) is fair game for federal agents.
United States v. Grace, supra, the Supreme Court says you're an idiot.
Since February 1, 1940, the United States acquires no jurisdiction over federal lands in a state until the head or other authorized officer of the department or agency which has custody of the lands formally accepts the jurisdiction offered by state law. See 40 U.S.C. § 255; Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (1943)
You just think they are lies because you're too ******* stupid to know any better.
OK I concede that point. I should have said that the feds have the power to arrest anywhere within the USA and it's territories.
These federal agents aren't wearing a standard uniform. They have no bdges no identifiers, and the uniform itself is just cammo gear available from anywhere including sporting goods stores to go hunting.
As you describe them, they sound just like plainclothes detectives picking up a suspect. Are Democrats now opposed to plainclothes detectives making arrests?
