AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
Neither is being a supercilious jerk like you are.it was in the court case you posted,,
also the 4th amendment to our constitution specifically says it,,
ignorant is no way to go through life my boy,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neither is being a supercilious jerk like you are.it was in the court case you posted,,
also the 4th amendment to our constitution specifically says it,,
ignorant is no way to go through life my boy,,
So were you there or not? Dickhead!I said "what I've seen" not what I experienced,,, dummass,,,
at least I am not wrong,,Neither is being a supercilious jerk like you are.
I don’t hat it at all, but for every right come ten responsibilities. That’s what you don’t understand.at least I am not wrong,,
you still havent answered why you hate our bill of rights,,
and one of those is not being forced to provide identity if a crime has not been committed,,I don’t hat it at all, but for every right come ten responsibilities. That’s what you don’t understand.
I don’t hat it at all, but for every right come ten responsibilities. That’s what you don’t understand.
Responsibilities always outweigh rights or privileges.No it doesnt. A right is a right whether you are responsible or not.
we have a responsibility to stand up to tyrants like you and defend those rights,,Responsibilities always outweigh rights or privileges.
we have a responsibility to stand up to tyrants like you and defend those rights,,
so **** off,,
law enforcement has a responsibility to protect the rights of the people not abuse them by asking for id when you havent committed a crime
did I say **** off already??
you are free at anytime to show what I got wrong,,Dont take posts like you replied to seriously.
Replenishment At-Sea?and one of those is not being forced to provide identity if a crime has not been committed,,
do you even know what R.A.S. is??
I figured you had nothing,,Dont take posts like you replied to seriously.
You know what? **** you.cops are getting to authoritarian and thinking they make the laws and can treat people any way they want to,,
makes it really hard to not cheer when one gets shot in the back of the head while sitting in their car,,
You know what? **** you.
That is a 4 year old response.
You don't fight the cops on the streets. You fight them in the courts.
Know your rights and just don't give them the ammunition to bury you.
Three federal judges sided with a mechanic suing Huntsville officers for false arrest, writing in an opinion this week that Alabamians do not have to show identification when asked by the police.
Roland Edger sued the city and two Huntsville officers, alleging they wrongly arrested him outside a church four years ago as he attempted to repair a customer’s car. Body camera video shows the officers arresting Edger as he, at first, declined to show them his driver’s license.
“So to summarize, it has been clearly established for decades prior to Mr. Edger’s arrest that the police are free to ask questions, and the public is free to ignore them,” a three-judge panel for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals said in a unanimous opinion issued this week.
..
Judge Charles R. Wilson, writing for the panel, said that Edger had not committed any crime, therefore police had no basis for arresting him. The judges also noted that Edger was not driving at the time and therefore was not required to show his license.
..
“Further, neither the parties nor our own research can identify any Alabama law that generally requires the public to carry physical identification — much less an Alabama law requiring them to produce it upon demand of a police officer,” Judge Wilson wrote. “There simply is no state law foundation for Officer McCabe’s demand that Mr. Edger produce physical identification.”
Edger’s lawsuit can go forward against Huntsville Officers Krista McCabe and Cameron Perillat, the judges ruled. The judges found that the officers are not entitled to qualified immunity — a legal doctrine that shields public officials from lawsuits when they are performing official duties — because they went beyond the bounds of the law when arresting Edger.
![]()
Federal judges side with mechanic suing Huntsville: ‘The public is free to ignore’ police questions
Bodycam video shows Huntsville police arrest man for initially declining to show his ID.www.al.com
I've noticed that the new hotness in police interactions is for them to charge people with "obstruction" when they don't want to answer their questions or don't tell the truth. Never mind that the whole point of obstruction laws was for physically obstructing/impeding an officer.
Freedom is scary.
imagine that,,You know what? **** you.
That is a 4 year old response.
You don't fight the cops on the streets. You fight them in the courts.
Know your rights and just don't give them the ammunition to bury you.
What right is being ceded?Never cede a right to the government.
Whose feelings are hurt, spectrum boi?imagine that,,
after for yrs a bootlickers feelings are still hurt,,
you seem upset and on the verge of a breakdownWhose feelings are hurt, spectrum boi?
There are no good cops. All cops are bad.It's sadly true though. The police in general are poorly trained, and have little to no understanding of a civilians rights.
Worse, they go out of their way to attack legit people, who have no record of any criminal activity.
Then, they lie about the interactions and pursue retaliatory indictments when you sue them.
Those cops are scum and give all the good ones a bad name.