eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,488
- 38,486
- 2,605
You just shoot them huh??I don't hit girls.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You just shoot them huh??I don't hit girls.
Legally the police can't shoot you based on what you might do, vermin.
Damn skippy. Forever I will see that as excessive use and not justified for Lethal Force.
Now we are clearly opposed in opinion.
The late beefalo was engaged in Treason.You just shoot them huh??
You stole it. I asked Ray Charles he even seen it.Who cares?
You can't handle the Truth.
Watch
Who won the 2020 election?
Tryants use if givernment to attack the other party you mean.The late beefalo was engaged in Treason.
Spared America the cost of trying her.
His love for America the stuff of Legend.![]()
§ 5–351.01. Use of deadly force. | D.C. Law Library
code.dccouncil.gov
Sure they can.
You should look up laws on use of deadly force. As a matter of fact here is the link for D.C.
"(1) The law enforcement officer actually and reasonably believes that deadly force is immediately necessary to protect the law enforcement officer or another person, other than the subject of the use of deadly force, from the threat of serious bodily injury or death;
(2) The law enforcement officer's actions are reasonable, given the totality of the circumstances; and"
That is why the law enforcement officer was cleared of any wrong doing. His actions were clearly to prevent imminent danger of death or bodily injury facing the mob and given the totality of the circumstances facing a riotous mob his actions were justified.
WW
Tryants use if givernment to attack the other party you mean.
While ignoring the crimes of your Riots for rent groups.
That's a Litmus Test of Reason.You stole it. I asked Ray Charles he even seen it.
Now you use Fascist tactics to attack political oppenents again.
Was your relative Adolf?
I will remember him as a guy without a dick who shot an unarmefd woman probably cause he couldnt fight his way out of a wet paper bag.His love for America the stuff of Legend.
I was referring ti Antifa and BLM.Just because some low iq ruminant died doing stupid shit doesn't mean anyone else was "rented".
You'll have plenty of opportunity....when we put his face on a c note.I will remember him as a guy without a dick who shot an unarmefd woman probably cause he couldnt fight his way out of a wet paper bag.
Amazing how Americans can and disagree huh Mr. Fascist?
Duh.I was referring ti Antifa and BLM.
Now I can only ask whether you are a rock is smarter. Rock is winning.
Lol, so you cowards would shoot someone for breaking a window in a public place. What scum.![]()
§ 5–351.01. Use of deadly force. | D.C. Law Library
code.dccouncil.gov
Sure they can.
You should look up laws on use of deadly force. As a matter of fact here is the link for D.C.
"(1) The law enforcement officer actually and reasonably believes that deadly force is immediately necessary to protect the law enforcement officer or another person, other than the subject of the use of deadly force, from the threat of serious bodily injury or death;
(2) The law enforcement officer's actions are reasonable, given the totality of the circumstances; and"
That is why the law enforcement officer was cleared of any wrong doing. His actions were clearly to prevent imminent danger of death or bodily injury facing the mob and given the totality of the circumstances facing a riotous mob his actions were justified.
WW
Documenting Trumpâs Abuse of WomenMost rapists like you do.
The Blind Hatred of the (Horrible Orange) Trump (Bad Man) is Truly Incredible To Behold..![]()
Takes one to call one. When your intelligence quotient reaches 168, try again. Of course, any one who eats candycorn loses their teeth at a rapid rate, and you are somewhat toothless, dearie.Dumbest
Human
Ever
What it means, is that the only way Trump can be barred is if he's convicted, i.e. due process of the law.So he didn't have standing...
Says nothing about the merit of his argument.