Federal judge tosses lawsuit claiming Trump can't run for office under 14th Amendment.

What it means, is that the only way Trump can be barred is if he's convicted, i.e. due process of the law.

His "rights and liberties" can't be deprived because an individual doesn't want him to run for office.
It's not an individual...it's his actions.
 
What it means, is that the only way Trump can be barred is if he's convicted, i.e. due process of the law.

His "rights and liberties" can't be deprived because an individual doesn't want him to run for office.
Makes perfect sense.. Except we're Obviously No Longer Living in the United states of America.
(The LAW Better be EQUAL and Applied without Prejudice)
Not used in a Weaponized Fashion as it currently is.
 
Remember that when your side gets stupid and sends your Anarchist groups like BLM to a deep red State small town.

That police officer was behind a door with multiple armed men and shot a unarmed woman.

Was he so qualified that he pissed himself from behind the door.

Loser. Should be cleaning Port O Lets
I think the anarchist groups are so repulsed by the rot, decay and crime in Dem / Socialist run cities that they have decided to sit out riots where they otherwise would be allowed free rein.

It’s really hilarious watching Dems /Socialists having to live in the pig styes they created and voted for.
 
I think the anarchist groups are so repulsed by the rot, decay and crime in Dem / Socialist run cities that they have decided to sit out riots where they otherwise would be allowed free rein.

It’s really hilarious watching Dems /Socialists having to live in the pig styes they created and voted for.
You'll always have Polk County
 
Fair post... Not sure where the idea is coming from that weapon's weren't among the citizen's at the capital on that day.

My opinion is for people on all sides to get a grip, because playing the same games doesn't do anything but cancel each other out. The truth needs to be focused on no matter where it lay.

Regardless of the activities of individuals at the capital on that day, to try and use any of it against Trump because he is a political rival is ridiculous and just plain stupid, unless maybe a smoking gun can be produced.

Highly unlikely.

I'm standing with Trump that he intended for the voices to be heard just like with the so called peaceful Democrat's protest (the ones that are peaceful), over various political and domestic issues, but I'm not for either side resorting to violence, and especially so if find that upper leadership's may have been calling for it.

Again "HIGHLY UNLIKELY" on J6.

Now in regards to the riot's, it definitely could be found out maybe, that their were leader's who were encouraging and instigating violence over judicial and due process in those riots.

Why haven't those people been pursued in the extreme ? We all know why...

Kamala Harris was bailing them out, and Maxine Waters was making irresponsible speak that could be construed as calling for violence against her political enemies, Chuck Schumer was making unethical statements along with many politicians and leftist activist who were getting caught up in the may lays or violence projecting frenzies.
The problem is truth. In murky water, it is hard to determine what the truth is. Its even harder to accept that truth when it is uncomfortable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top