Federal Judge Reveals Incumbent President Joe Biden Ordered FBI Access to Mar-a-Lago Documents

Holy fuck. :eusa_doh:

That says Biden requested NARA turn over documents to the FBI. It doesn't say he requested the FBI raid Trump.

You cons are brain-dead.
Why would Biden do that?
 
Because the NARA discovered there were hundreds of classified documents contained in those 15 boxes collected in January.
Trump often worked from Mar-A-Lago, so ofc things like that would be there.
 
Trump often worked from Mar-A-Lago, so ofc things like that would be there.

But it had been a year since he left office and the NARA had discovered he was still in possession of classified documents in those 15 boxes.
 
But it had been a year since he left office and the NARA had discovered he was still in possession of classified documents in those 15 boxes.
Who is the ultimate arbiter of what's classified in the US?

Trump could have burned it all if he wanted to.
 
Who is the ultimate arbiter of what's classified in the US?

Trump could have burned it all if he wanted to.

The president.

And no, he could not burn them if he wanted to. There are laws against destroying government documents. All he could do is declassify them.
 
The president.

And no, he could not burn them if he wanted to. There are laws against destroying government documents. All he could do is declassify them.
That's where you're wrong. You didn't read the precedents in Clinton's case, did ya?

 
The premise is the same as the Magna Carter to the US Constitution!
The 4th Amendment took out that thrash, yet the DOJ and the FBI seemingly either forgot their ABC's of Law School, or they are out of control and unckecked rogue partisan HACKS!
A "warrant" for EVERYTHING???
GTFOH!!! :eusa_hand:

They went to a federal magistrate and got a search warrant. That is part of the ABCs of Law School. Worth noting that Trump has made no claim that his 4th Amendment rights have been violated.
 
That's where you're wrong. You didn't read the precedents in Clinton's case, did ya?


Clinton took no documents with her when she resigned as Secretary of State. Trump did.
 
Last edited:
They lied.

On Monday, August 8, 2022, the Biden FBI-DOJ raided President Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago and rifled through his home and belongings for 9 hours. The FBI even ransacked 16-year-old Barron Trump’s room and First Lady Melania Trump’s closet.

The following day White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre told reporters that the Biden White House learned of the raid in the news.

Jean Pierre insisted that the President was not briefed on the raid.



Published September 5, 2022

Another prime example of Joe Potatohead lying to Americans.

He said he knew nothing of the raid.

Lying sonofabitch.

The Moon Bats that voted for him are idiots.
 
Someday, hopefully, you will come to a realization that you were lied to your whole life.
You were TAUGHT that America and Capitalism is bad. How did that happen?
Here, let Uncle Yuri explain it to you if you care to understand how you got where your misguided brain is at.



Pure capitalism is bad.
Your brain is in Never-Never Land.
 
You're a complete fucking idiot.

Blather on, fool.

Fucking Goebbels... you asswipes have left orbit. Goebbels? Reliable? Sure.

You want to talk about Mengele Fauci too? Or should we save that for another thread?

He is more reliable than Trump or this crooked judge. That is not saying much.
 
~~~~~~
To back up your post Margot Cleveland wrote in the Federalist the following:
"The federal judge’s 24-page order further calls into question the DOJ’s targeting of Trump".

1. President Biden Was Directly Involved​

In including this quote in her order, Cannon cited the letter the NARA’s acting archivist sent to Trump’s lawyer. That letter explained that Biden had decided to defer to the archivist’s “determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not [the archivist] should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege.’” Acting Archivist Debra Steidel Wall then explained in the letter that based on her consultation with the assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, she had decided not to honor Trump’s claim of privilege"

2. Timeline of the Trump Targeting Is Suspect​

Why would the DOJ seek a grand jury subpoena for any and all documents in Trump’s possession bearing classification markings before reviewing the material provided by the NARA? And given that the DOJ obtained the subpoena the day after the NARA told Trump’s lawyer “the incumbent President” had requested the archive provide the documents to the FBI, one must ask: Did Biden direct the DOJ to obtain the grand jury subpoena?

3. Not So Fast Joe — Trump’s Executive Privilege Can’t Be So Quickly Sidestepped​

Cannon continued, “the Supreme Court noted that, at least in connection with a congressional investigation, ‘[t]he questions whether and in what circumstances a former President may obtain a court order preventing disclosure of privileged records from his tenure in office, in the face of a determination by the incumbent President to waive the privilege, are unprecedented and raise serious and substantial concerns.’” To protect former President Trump’s ability to raise a question of executive privilege, then, a special master should review the documents and make an initial assessment, the court concluded.

4. Members of the Investigative Team Saw Confidential Attorney-Client Documents​

Cannon explained in rejecting the government’s argument. The court then stressed that the evidence suggests the Privilege Review Team’s initial screening for potentially privileged material was faulty.

5. DOJ Seized a Lot of Personal Material​

“the Government also has acknowledged that it seized some “[p]ersonal effects without evidentiary value.” And “some of the seized items (e.g., articles of clothing)” were “readily identifiable as personal property.” The FBI had also seized three of Trump’s passports, but those items have already been returned to the former president.

6. FBI Suggested Trump Committed a Crime by Returning a Torn-Up Document to the NARA​

It appears the special agent in charge made a criminal referral of the former president because documents Trump had returned to the archivist had been torn up at some point. This reference screams “witch hunt,” which leads to the second point: The unredacted portions of the search warrant affidavit omit any reference to the torn documents..

7. Leaks Look Bad Too​

Those “unfortunate” leaks provide further proof of the politicization of this entire affair: In three weeks’ time, Mar-a-Lago has sprung more leaks than have escaped from Special Counsel John Durham’s team over three years. And while the special master may not be able to silence the deep-state leakers, he or she will provide a check to the Biden administration.


Commentary:
Biden and his spokepersons told us he knew nothing about the FBI raid. That has now been proven to be a bald faced lie.
How in the trailer park hell can one confuse clothing with documents.
If a single one of these “articles of clothing” belonged to Melania you can watch the suburban women’s votes for donks in general and Biden in specific, evaporate like odious flatulence in a typhoon.
The Biden’s can’t stop shooting themselves in the dork. No self awareness. Despite these machinations of the weaponized DoJ and FBI Stasi Joey Biden's numbers continue to fall and that’s from a current approval of 30%.

This judge is a bald faced liar. Her ruling is so ridiculous that Bob Barr, who claimed Mueller's investigation exonerated Trump, calls this ruling horseshit and will be overturned.
 
Nonsense. Some alleged that it was a bad decision. That doesn’t make it one.

So? Barr is full of shit, now. But, he was only partly wrong about Mueller. Mueller didn’t exonerate anyone. He couldn’t. Wasn’t his job. Wasn’t his place.

Mueller never exonerated Trump. Barr lied for Trump.
 

Forum List

Back
Top