Federal Judge knocks Jack Smith: questions "the legal propriety"

[BluesLegend]

Mcdonnell was convicted by a court of law, then it was appealed up to the supreme court, where they legalized corruption.

LOL a court of corrupt Democrats was bitch slapped by the SCOTUS.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The Jan 6th case will be thrown out on appeal.
And that judge should be arrested for human-rights violations.

What alt-reality are you living in?? Read the indictment!

 

[Lastamender]

Does anyone know what limiting actions involves?

 

[Cellblock2429]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

/——/ I’m not a lawyer but I think it means Smith used proceedings he wasn’t supposed to use. Why would he do this if his case is soooooo strong?

 

[The Duke]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

I need a legalese to layman translator for all that there.

 

[The Duke]

Some day you’ll learn about jurisdiction.

Commiecrats learning?

Commiecrats don't learn, they double, triple, quadruple down on retardation to infinity!

 

[Cellblock2429]

I need a legalese to layman translator for all that there.

/——/ It means Jack Smith screwed the pooch.

 

[Rawley]

The SCOTUS ruled 9-0 against Smith in the McDonald case.

8-0. Scalia was dead.

 

[The Duke]

How many late night network shows have hosted Brand since he woke up to what's happening?

I bet none.

Russel Brand is a liberal, and that's OK.

 

[Oldestyle]

Too bad, a fed judge that has tried a total of 14 cases, doesn't know that a Federal grand jury can indict anywhere in the U.S. if it is a felony they are indicting.

Really, Debbie? Unless I'm mistaken the following would apply?
"1. The Constitution of the United States, Article III. Section 2, Paragraph 3, provides:

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed."

So why is Smith having a Grand Jury in Washington DC indict a citizen for crimes that were alleged to have taken place in Florida??

 

[Cellblock2429]

Really, Debbie? Unless I'm mistaken the following would apply?
"1. The Constitution of the United States, Article III. Section 2, Paragraph 3, provides:

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed."

So why is Smith having a Grand Jury in Washington DC indict a citizen for crimes that were alleged to have taken place in Florida??

/——/ Because he doesn’t have a legitimate case. DUH

 

[Lastamender]

8-0. Scalia was dead.

With no autopsy.

 

[konradv]

With no autopsy.

That’s because Cheney didn’t have an alibi.

 

[Clipper]

Some day you’ll learn about jurisdiction.

She's a piece of shit Trump supporter who's trying to delay the case for that fuck who appointed her, you moron.

She's already shown to be one of his asseaters.

 

[skews13]

In an order filed Monday morning in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump, Florida District Judge Aileen Cannon questioned "the legal propriety" of prosecutors working for Special Counsel Jack Smith to use "an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate." She also struck down the sealed filings of two prosecutors.

"The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97] on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual fashion," Cannon wrote.

Federal Judge Suggests Grand Jury Abuse in Classified Document Case Against Trump

townhall.com

Comment:
Yea, Jack Smith is a hack lawyer.
He is going to get knocked down over and over again.

Hey dimwit. It’s called a superseding indictment. Jack Smith doesn’t have to explain Jack Shit to that partisan hack, federalist society know nothing judge.

And that stupid twat just laid the groundwork for her recusal. Smith is playing her like the rookie she is.

 

[Oldestyle]

Hey dimwit. It’s called a superseding indictment. Jack Smith doesn’t have to explain Jack Shit to that partisan hack, federalist society know nothing judge.

And that stupid twat just laid the groundwork for her recusal. Smith is playing her like the rookie she is.

Smith has no right to use a DC Grand Jury and a DC judge to get indictments for crimes that allegedly took place in Florida after Trum had left office and moved to Mar A Lago. That Florida judge asked a question that needed to be asked and Jack Smith doesn't have a good answer. That's a clear case of prosecutorial misconduct and the DOJ should pay the price for Smith's deliberate abuses of power!

 

[Rye Catcher]

The SCOTUS ruled 9-0 against Smith in the McDonald case.

LMAO: Jack Smith is 54 years old; The case ruled by SCOTUS would have been in 1985; Jack Smith would have been 35 years younger (17).

McDonald v. Smith (1985)

McDonald v. Smith (1985) held that the petition clause of the First Amendment does not endow individuals with absolute immunity from charges of slander and libel.

www.mtsu.edu

You right-wingers are the dumbest and dishonest posters ever. You wanted to get-away, didn't you?

 

[Lastamender]

LMAO: Jack Smith is 54 years old; The case ruled by SCOTUS would have been in 1985; Jack Smith would have been 35 years younger (17).

McDonald v. Smith (1985)

McDonald v. Smith (1985) held that the petition clause of the First Amendment does not endow individuals with absolute immunity from charges of slander and libel.

www.mtsu.edu

You right-wingers are the dumbest and dishonest posters ever. You wanted to get-away, didn't you?

So what? I mixed the name up. That means you know Smith fucked up and continues to do so. Anything else?