They arenât. Like laws muzzling discussion of CRT, this is just another example of the rightâs anti-constitutional authoritarianism.
Freedom of speech?
Freedom of assembly?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They arenât. Like laws muzzling discussion of CRT, this is just another example of the rightâs anti-constitutional authoritarianism.
Freedom of speech?
Freedom of assembly?
Since no one is claiming that as a right...what is your point? Just trying to justify rightwing authoritarianism?Youâve donât have the right to assault and kill cops, loot stores, or burn businesses you loon. CRT is bullshit, just like all your âargumentsâ.
âHB1âs new definition of âriotâ both fails to put Floridians of ordinary intelligence on notice of what acts it criminalizes and encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement, making this provision vague to the point of unconstitutionality,â Walker wrote in the order granting a temporary injunction against the law until the issue is settled in court.You want riots?
We saw the same rightwing authoritarianism with the Florida measure violating the First Amendment rights of private social media, likewise struck down by the courts.Since no one is claiming that as a right...what is your point? Just trying to justify rightwing authoritarianism?
âHB1âs new definition of âriotâ both fails to put Floridians of ordinary intelligence on notice of what acts it criminalizes and encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement, making this provision vague to the point of unconstitutionality,â Walker wrote in the order granting a temporary injunction against the law until the issue is settled in court.
Walker wrote that HB 1 ârequires individuals to âspeculate as to the meaning of penal statutes,â at the risk of their liberty.â
[âŚ]
In court before Walker last week, plaintiffsâ attorneys argued HB 1 is chilling free speech with civil rights groups reporting declining memberships and demonstration participation.
HB 1âs âchilling effectâ may be in the eye of the beholder, Walker wrote in his ruling, but itâs a real constitutional concern.
âWhile there may be some Floridians who welcome the âchilling effectâ that this law has on the Plaintiffs in this case,â he wrote, âdepending on who is in power, next time it could be their ox being gored.â ibid
Exactly.
The sole purpose of this bad-faith measure was to silence citizens of color and deny them the right to engage in lawful, warranted protest against racism and violence.
Intended to intimidate black Americans, the law is another manifestation of Republican tyranny and the rightâs resurrection of Jim Crow.
Making yourself look dumber day by day loser.
Correct.I can't believe that there are so many stupid people here.
For all you stupid people:
It's already illegal to riot or to cause a riot.
So there is no need or reason to write more laws when rioting and inciting a riot is already illegal.
That isn't want this law was about and everyone knows it.
Correct.
This law is about conservatives seeking to silence Americans of color engaged in peaceful, lawful protest against police violence and criminality.
You have to bust out in a great big belly laugh when some leftwing moron whines about being silenced by conservatives. Did you know that Tom CottonCorrect.
This law is about conservatives seeking to silence Americans of color engaged in peaceful, lawful protest against police violence and criminality.
Beating people up is not speech, moron.Correct.
This law is about conservatives seeking to silence Americans of color engaged in peaceful, lawful protest against police violence and criminality.
Looks like another clueless statement from our resident potty mouth. I would ask for a link supporting your claim but you and ilk never seem able to come up with one.Pathetic deflection asshole. YOU support rioting, looting, and murder. You just want no consequences for YOUR sideâs criminal acts. Making yourself look dumber day by day loser.
Clarifying the language is perfectly acceptable. Denying average citizens the right to defend themselves in mob situations is just not going to be allowed without a fight. I suspect the OP would cheerfully see some guy in his car surrounded by "righteous" protesters who are trying to get at him to harm or even kill him. This madness we've seen out west where mobs are protected and any person who harms them as a means of self-defense gets the full weight of the law.
THAT won't be accepted down south. Have a couple of situations like that where an innocent citizen is imprisoned for self-defense and all hell is going to break loose.
Riots are NOT Free speech or assembly.They arenât. Like laws muzzling discussion of CRT, this is just another example of the rightâs anti-constitutional authoritarianism.
Freedom of speech?
Freedom of assembly?
This appropriate, warranted ruling is yet another example of how dishonest conservatives are, and that all they do is lie.Riots are not peaceful you idiot loon
Cripes Jones do you need a nap?
If I was a "protester" at an event, I would be prepared in today's world. Learn from BLM and Antifa. They keep upping the anti. From firecrackers, smoke bombs, acids, M80's to weapons now. The so called proud boys or others or even Christian protesters are behind them in those things. If you go to their den, it must be with the idea to defeat them. Otherwise why do it? To know what they really are, the Antifa has had many of their women swing punches at others and then some punched back. And the male Antifa people would spout.. Why are you hitting a woman? This while these people are destroying areas and injuring and even killing other individuals.They arenât. Like laws muzzling discussion of CRT, this is just another example of the rightâs anti-constitutional authoritarianism.
Freedom of speech?
Freedom of assembly?
Your surrender is noted.Looks like another clueless statement from our resident potty mouth. I would ask for a link supporting your claim but you and ilk never seem able to come up with one.
I can't believe that there are so many stupid people here.
For all you stupid people:
It's already illegal to riot or to cause a riot.
So there is no need or reason to write more laws when rioting and inciting a riot is already illegal.
That isn't want this law was about and everyone knows it.
It's already illegal to riot or to cause a riot.
ReportedGo fuck yourself you yellow coward. By the way, no man wants to âwrangleâ with you. Normal men donât swing that way. Youâve been reported for stalking.