Federal District Court judge Orders Return of El Salvador Citizen from El Salvador

[Marener]

Trump merely repeated what the court found vertifible evidence of.

The fact he is in a gang doesn’t change his deportation status

You keep making shit up. There’s no evidence he’s in a gang.

 

[struth]

You keep making shit up. There’s no evidence he’s in a gang.

Of course there is, you just keep ignoring the evidence that Judge Jones cited when he denied him bond in 2019

 

[WEATHER53]

Of course there is, you just keep ignoring the evidence that Judge Jones cited when he denied him bond in 2019

He feels he has concluded a verdict that is more knowing and correct than judges

 

[excalibur]

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis "properly requires the Government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador," further ruling that "The Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps."

If the Trump regime persists in defying the Court, it might take a contempt order to prompt Trump and his lickspittles to to do the right thing.

And nowhere does it say in that to return him to the USA.

And you ignore this part of what SCOTUS also said:

The intended scope of the term “effectuate” in the District Court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court’s authority. (emphasis added)​

 

[excalibur]

He was in the United States legally, has no criminal record, and was deported illegally in what the Trump regime has admitted was a mistake.

No, he was NOT in the USA legally. He was given am Order of Removal by an immigration judge, appealed to BIA which upheld that order. He admitted he was an illegal entry.

The only (maybe) error was sending him to El Salvador, which the immigration court said because he feared gang reprisal he shouldn't be returned to. But that reasoning no longer exists as that gang has been eliminated by Bukele. He was removable to any other country.

 

[excalibur]

Why is Trump paying Bukele to keep a man who was convicted of no crimes imprisoned?

Speculation on your part that we are paying El Salvador. Why would when he is a citizen of El Salvador.

He was found guilty in immigration court of being MS-13, upheld by BIA, and admitted he was in the USA illegally.

 

[struth]

You keep making shit up. There’s no evidence he’s in a gang.

The Federal Immigration Court in Maryland says he is.

I'm going to believe a federal court over a hillbilly dipshit like you every time, thanks very much.

 

[Marener]

Of course there is, you just keep ignoring the evidence that Judge Jones cited when he denied him bond in 2019

You don’t know anything about it so why are you bringing it up?

 

[struth]

No, he was NOT in the USA legally. He was given am Order of Removal by an immigration judge, appealed to BIA which upheld that order. He admitted he was an illegal entry.

The only (maybe) error was sending him to El Salvador, which the immigration court said because he feared gang reprisal he shouldn't be returned to. But that reasoning no longer exists as that gang has been eliminated by Bukele. He was removable to any other country.

The demafasict party has become the party of illegal aliens and terrorist organizations

 

[excalibur]

The demafasict party has become the party of illegal aliens and terrorist organizations

Thus, bringing in, even flying in(!) 10+ million in 4-years of the Biden Junta.

 

[struth]

You don’t know anything about it so why are you bringing it up?

Of course I do, I keep telling you about it

 

[Marener]

Of course I do, I keep telling you about it

I asked and you dodged.

What was the evidence against him?

 

[struth]

I asked and you dodged.

What was the evidence against him?

What am I dodging?

The evidence presented to the court

See the link in post 87

 

[Marener]

What am I dodging?

The evidence presented to the court

See the link in post 87

What was the evidence?

 

[struth]

What was the evidence?

Read the order in post 87

You won’t, cause you can’t handle the truth…

 

[Marener]

Read the order in post 87

You won’t, cause you can’t handle the truth…

I did.

What was the evidence against him?

 

[struth]

I did.

What was the evidence against him?

So then you know. Thanks

 

[Marener]

So then you know. Thanks

I know.

You don’t.

What’s the evidence against him?

 

[struth]

I know.

You don’t.

What’s the evidence against him?

I do know I read the courts ruling. Hence why u have been telling you there was verifiable evidence and you rambled on like an idiot for the past 24 hours ignoring. It

 

[Marener]

I do know I read the courts ruling. Hence why u have been telling you there was verifiable evidence and you rambled on like an idiot for the past 24 hours ignoring. It

If you read it, then you should be able to explain it.

What was the evidence?