wamose
Diamond Member
Democrats want to ignore all allegations of cheating and Republicans don't. That right there tells you what side is cheating. This is a classic bums rush.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So. . . . Are you saying that the FEC chairman did not say that he believes there is enough evidence of election fraud to make this election illegitimate? You realize he said this in an interview on Newsmax, right? You can go watch the video. You know this, right?
This election may well go down as the turning point that eventually led to civil war, the point where Democrats literally stole a presidential election and then refused to acknowledge the compelling evidence that they stole it. When one side uses multiple forms of voter fraud to seize power, this can sometimes--eventually--lead to armed conflict.
Yeah..except what you call evidence..is not very compelling at all! It amounts to some small shit..and a monstrous flailing about of Trump people...amorphous conspiracies and manufactured 'gotcha' moments--there is no there there--most of America has figured it out..but you hard core Trumpists..will be watching TrumpTV this time next year...and Biden will be in the White House..pardoning the turkey!The fact that you have to find these obscure and utterly "fake news" sites to promote these lies, should tell you that you're being conned by Don the Con, but not, you're not even smart enough to see that.
Mike thinks he's wearing Magic Underwear and Joseph Smith was totally talking to God, so he used to being conned.
So. . . . Are you saying that the FEC chairman did not say that he believes there is enough evidence of election fraud to make this election illegitimate? You realize he said this in an interview on Newsmax, right? You can go watch the video. You know this, right?
This election may well go down as the turning point that eventually led to civil war, the point where Democrats literally stole a presidential election and then refused to acknowledge the compelling evidence that they stole it. When one side uses multiple forms of voter fraud to seize power, coupled with rioting and cancel culture, this can sometimes--eventually--lead to armed conflict.
Well...we do a bum..to rush---out of the White House..so there is that...LOL!Democrats want to ignore all allegations of cheating and Republicans don't. That right there tells you what side is cheating. This is a classic bums rush.
You vermin are the cons.The chairman of the Federal Election Commission has concluded that there is enough evidence of voter fraud to declare that "This election is illegitimate." If you did not hear about this on the news shows you watch/listen to/read, you might want to find other news outlets.
President of the Federal Election Commission: ‘This election is illegitimate’
No less than Federal Election Commission President Trey Trainor, during the presidential elections, ...m.thebl.com
The fact that you have to find these obscure and utterly "fake news" sites to promote these lies, should tell you that you're being conned by Don the Con, but not, you're not even smart enough to see that.
We already have more than enough evidence to nullify this election. By December they'll be ready to tar and feather the cheaters and the media that have enabled them.On September 16, 2020, Trainor said that churches could endorse political candidates. He justified this by pointing to Trump's 2017 executive order that the Johnson Amendment should not be enforced. FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub disagreed with Trainor, saying that the Johnson Amendment remains law and "cannot be undone with an executive order."[10]
Thankfully this sycophant's term as Chair expires in December
Heard about this days ago..on PBS. This person is a bought and paid for Trump stooge. He repeats Trump talking points without proof.The president of the Federal Election Commission has concluded that there is enough evidence of voter fraud to declare that "This election is illegitimate." If you did not hear about this on the news shows you watch/listen to/read, you might want to find other news outlets.
FEC chairman debunks MSM claims of ‘no fraud’, says counting illegal votes can make election ‘illegitimate’ | One America News Network
Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from OANN.com. Breaking news and video. Latest Current News: U.S., World, Entertainment, Health, Business, Technology, Politics, Sports.www.oann.com
The statement is filled with caveats and maybe's--BTW..the 10,000 out of state voter thing in Nevada has been debunked. The number is 3,062..and many of them are military who are eligible to vote in Nevada. If you threw all the affected votes out.it would make no difference.
Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
The Democrats tried a similar but smaller-scale election fraud stunt in 2000, when Al Gore refused to concede even after he lost the statewide manual recount. Gore then tried to get a recount only in a few Democratic counties. When that was blocked, he then tried to get a statewide recount only of the undervotes (because he suspected the undervotes favored him). He never, ever wanted to "count all the votes," but only the votes that he suspected would favor him. After FL's supreme court illegally allowed the statewide undervote recount to proceed, the U.S. Supreme Court stepped in and halted the illegal, fraudulent recount. Only then did Gore concede, on December 13, over a month after the election.
Just looking at the big picture, as usual. I don't claim to have the answers.Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
Damn..what a mess of assumptions! Lessee..what first. The video evidence...is meaningless without context..and the appropriate courts have seen it...and threw it out. PBS probably did not address it..because they could not prove its provenance or its probity. I assume that all news sources don't give me the 'full' story..how could they?Heard about this days ago..on PBS. This person is a bought and paid for Trump stooge. He repeats Trump talking points without proof.The president of the Federal Election Commission has concluded that there is enough evidence of voter fraud to declare that "This election is illegitimate." If you did not hear about this on the news shows you watch/listen to/read, you might want to find other news outlets.
FEC chairman debunks MSM claims of ‘no fraud’, says counting illegal votes can make election ‘illegitimate’ | One America News Network
Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from OANN.com. Breaking news and video. Latest Current News: U.S., World, Entertainment, Health, Business, Technology, Politics, Sports.www.oann.com
PBS?! So because PBS tells you that the FEC chairman is a stooge, you just gobble it and go with it? Could it be that the FEC chairman is an honest, intelligent man who is much more informed about the evidence of election fraud than you are?
The statement is filled with caveats and maybe's--BTW..the 10,000 out of state voter thing in Nevada has been debunked. The number is 3,062..and many of them are military who are eligible to vote in Nevada. If you threw all the affected votes out.it would make no difference.
How do you know it has been "debunked"? Did you bother to read the other side of the story? Did it occur to you that the news sources you are using are not giving you the whole story?
I notice you said nothing about the VIDEO evidence that the FEC chairman mentioned, video of election workers illegally duplicating a ballot or marking a blank ballot. Why didn't you comment on that? Because PBS didn't address it? Why is that?
Seems more like typical libtard tunnel vision to me.Just looking at the big picture, as usual. I don't claim to have the answers.Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
When did I say he wasn't qualified? What a straw man. You're better than that, Gramps.Seems more like typical libtard tunnel vision to me.Just looking at the big picture, as usual. I don't claim to have the answers.Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
Why isn't he qualified for the position?
PBS?! So because PBS tells you that the FEC chairman is a stooge, you just gobble it and go with it? Could it be that the FEC chairman is an honest, intelligent man who is much more informed about the evidence of election fraud than you are?
How do you know it has been "debunked"? Did you bother to read the other side of the story? Did it occur to you that the news sources you are using are not giving you the whole story? The chairman was talking about the initial reports he received about Nevada, and this was only part of the evidence that he cited.
I notice you said nothing about the VIDEO evidence that the FEC chairman mentioned, video of election workers illegally duplicating a ballot or marking a blank ballot. Why didn't you comment on that? Because PBS didn't address it? Why is that?
I'm not the one who brought up his hiring date which isn't relevant to the topic. That was youWhen did I say he wasn't qualified? What a straw man. You're better than that, Gramps.Seems more like typical libtard tunnel vision to me.Just looking at the big picture, as usual. I don't claim to have the answers.Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
Why isn't he qualified for the position?
Motivations are relevant.I'm not the one who brought up his hiring date which isn't relevant to the topic. That was youWhen did I say he wasn't qualified? What a straw man. You're better than that, Gramps.Seems more like typical libtard tunnel vision to me.Just looking at the big picture, as usual. I don't claim to have the answers.Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
Why isn't he qualified for the position?
Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?
What are the man's "motivations"?Motivations are relevant.I'm not the one who brought up his hiring date which isn't relevant to the topic. That was youWhen did I say he wasn't qualified? What a straw man. You're better than that, Gramps.Seems more like typical libtard tunnel vision to me.Just looking at the big picture, as usual. I don't claim to have the answers.Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
Why isn't he qualified for the position?
I don't know. I think I have a good grasp of Trump's motivations, though.What are the man's "motivations"?Motivations are relevant.I'm not the one who brought up his hiring date which isn't relevant to the topic. That was youWhen did I say he wasn't qualified? What a straw man. You're better than that, Gramps.Seems more like typical libtard tunnel vision to me.Just looking at the big picture, as usual. I don't claim to have the answers.Based on your logic you could NEVER eat out because most restaurants hire new cooks faster than a revolving door. Can't trust the "new guy" right?Trainor was appointed by Trump in May, fyi.This was written 3 days ago and already posted who knows how many times. You are repetitive and very late to the show. Be a little more responsible in your posting.
Why isn't he qualified for the position?
We dont need to have the election nullified, we just need a real hand audit of the ballots and throw out the ones with:We already have more than enough evidence to nullify this election. By December they'll be ready to tar and feather the cheaters and the media that have enabled them.