FBI Will Lead Investigation in Minneapolis Shooting

[d0gbreath]

Liberals bringing their rabid dogs to heel? That would be the correct answer, so you loons are likely to do the opposite.

You seem smart. I'll give you that.

 

[IM2]

Liberals bringing their rabid dogs to heel? That would be the correct answer, so you loons are likely to do the opposite.

Liberals aren't the problem here you lying sos.

 

[IM2]

You seem smart. I'll give you that.

The comment he made was not smart.

 

[Orangecat]

Why did her wife exit the vehicle to film? Rather odd for people just passing through.

 

[MarathonMike]

The FBI will now take sole authority in the investigation of the ICE murder in Minnesota. Minnesota state authorities will not be alowed access to any of the evidence about the killing. So here we see another fascist move by this government.

Minneapolis ICE shooting: FBI will lead investigation; BCA won't have access to case material​

The FBI will lead the investigation into the fatal shooting by an ICE official in Minneapolis, and state officials are barred from helping in the investigation, according to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA).

The BCA says it was called to help investigate, but federal officials have "reversed course" and now the BCA will no longer have access to case materials.

Minneapolis ICE shooting: BCA won't have access to case material, FBI will lead investigation

Tensions are rising as state leaders voice concerns over the FBI's exclusion of Minnesota's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension from the investigation into the shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent.

www.fox9.com

If this was a true case of self defense by ICE, this would not be done.

You applauded the murder of Ashli Babbitt, hypocrite.

 

[d0gbreath]

The comment he made was not smart.

The last part was.

 

[IM2]

The last part was.

The rabid liberals don't really exist. These guys have manufactured a narrative and keeps repeting it. All the evidence shows that the violence is on the right. That includes these ICE Agents who are primarily right-wingers.

 

[martybegan]

The rabid liberals don't really exist. These guys have manufactured a narrative and keeps repeting it. All the evidence shows that the violence is on the right. That includes these ICE Agents who are primarily right-wingers.

The classical liberal doesn't exist on the left anymore.

You twats are now authoritarian progressive SJW fucktards.

 

[d0gbreath]

The rabid liberals don't really exist. These guys have manufactured a narrative and keeps repeting it. All the evidence shows that the violence is on the right. That includes these ICE Agents who are primarily right-wingers.

The violence is currently on the right. That will change.

 

[martybegan]

The violence is currently on the right. That will change.

You idiots still don't realize you can't lie about this anymore. There is too much information out there, information that can't be controlled by your lefty "betters"

Can't stop the signal.

 

[Hellbilly]

You applauded the murder of Ashli Babbitt, hypocrite.

You applauded the murder of George Floyd, hypocrite

 

[citygator]

It's the entire point of sanctuary cities you ******* idiot.

ICE: New York won’t honor 14,000 detainer requests

Spin this, *****.

ICE detainers are unconstitutional without warrants and states have been sued and lost for executing them up to $150,000 per instance. I bet you didnt know that from reading your rag. What research did you do to validate that article? Any?

• Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (2014) — Federal court ruled that holding someone past their release time based solely on an ICE detainer violates the Fourth Amendment because detainers are not judicial warrants.
• Lunn v. Commonwealth (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2017) — State’s highest court held that Massachusetts law provides no authority for state or local officers to detain someone based only on an ICE detainer.
• Morales v. Chadbourne (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016) — Federal appellate court ruled ICE detainers are requests, not commands, and that detaining someone without probable cause violates the Constitution; resulted in a settlement after a wrongful detention.
• Galarza v. Szalczyk (3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2014) — Court ruled local governments can be held liable for honoring ICE detainers without warrants; detainers are voluntary and not mandatory.

 

[Rogue AI]

Liberals aren't the problem here you lying sos.

Keep telling yourself that. You loons have been wrong about everything since Nov 2024.

 

[Oddball]

And here come the usual idiots repeating lies

,

Never mind the shameless lie that there's a murder involved.

 

[Rogue AI]

You applauded the murder of George Floyd, hypocrite

No, the right has firmly stood against fentanyl.

 

[martybegan]

ICE detainers are unconstitutional without warrants and states have been sued and lost for executing them up to $150,000 per instance. I bet you didnt know that from reading your rag. What research did you do to validate that article? Any?

• Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (2014) — Federal court ruled that holding someone past their release time based solely on an ICE detainer violates the Fourth Amendment because detainers are not judicial warrants.
• Lunn v. Commonwealth (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2017) — State’s highest court held that Massachusetts law provides no authority for state or local officers to detain someone based only on an ICE detainer.
• Morales v. Chadbourne (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016) — Federal appellate court ruled ICE detainers are requests, not commands, and that detaining someone without probable cause violates the Constitution; resulted in a settlement after a wrongful detention.
• Galarza v. Szalczyk (3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2014) — Court ruled local governments can be held liable for honoring ICE detainers without warrants; detainers are voluntary and not mandatory.

All current law low to mid level cases decided by idiot lefty judges.

It's still the States ignoring the feds, something you claimed didn't happen.

Now you do the usual thing and goalpost move to "it's happening and it's good that it's happening"

You are a ******* lowlife, who deserves to outlive your own progeny and die alone.

 

[Hellbilly]

No, the right has firmly stood against fentanyl.

The right supports everything that’s evil.

 

[citygator]

All current law low to mid level cases decided by idiot lefty judges.

It's still the States ignoring the feds, something you claimed didn't happen.

Now you do the usual thing and goalpost move to "it's happening and it's good that it's happening"

You are a ******* lowlife, who deserves to outlive your own progeny and die alone.

Again. You cant show local governments not cooperating with constitutional requests. I assume you get the fact that detainees are suing local governments for being detained against their 4th amendment rights? Right? You get it?

 

[Oddball]

Again. You cant show local governments not cooperating with constitutional requests. I assume you get the fact that detainees are suing local governments for being detained against their 4th amendment rights? Right? You get it?

There we go again, pretending that you give flying **** #1 about the Constitution.

The only use that twerps like you have for the charter is to find ways to circumvent and debase its limits.

 

[martybegan]

Again. You cant show local governments not cooperating with constitutional requests. I assume you get the fact that detainees are suing local governments for being detained against their 4th amendment rights? Right? You get it?

Where's the Constitutional requirement for the feds to fund agencies that won't cooperate with them?

The Constitutionality of anything when dealing with lefty twats like you is up in the air depending on your political views.

**** you, and **** the judges in question.

You have been added to the list of people on this board I will cheer when they stop posting, hoping you made the earth a better place by being 6 feet under it.