FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

[j-mac]

You keep supplying the proof! Stop making yourself out to be a dumbass, and it will definitely improve your self-esteem.

Always gotta have that last word eh narcissist? You should really try to do better, aiming to be the board's 'mean girl' doesn't suit you.

 

[Delldude]

He's a very intolerant, self centered, asshole. I know that...

Wait a minute, if it wasn't for his keen awareness, none of us would have ever realized this was a CIA op.

Trolls don’t deal with facts.

And that's your biggest downfall.............

 

[j-mac]

Wait a minute, if it wasn't for his keen awareness, none of us would have ever realized this was a CIA op.

Good one...I tell ya...One things Trump has been masterful at since he hit the scene, is causing these nutjobs into revealing their crazy....These are NOT well people. And now thanks to our President, they are on full display as to their mental deviancies.....

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

Why do they need lawyers until they are charged with a crime?

Duh, thread OP says they are going to be interviewed by the FBI.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Absolutely. I gave you the example yesterday but you blew it off. If Mark Kelly went to everyone under your command and told them "you need to question every order given you by Admiral Rockwell and you don't have to follow the illegal ones."

What do you think would be the effect on discipline in your command?

Well except he didn't say that did he?

They already know that that they don't have to follow illegal orders, dipshit! You might know that if you ever served or were you asleep at the switch?

They pulled a fast one on everyone by stating something that was true and got everyone to think that Trump was issuing illegal orders without saying it. That's a psy op. making you think something is true without saying it is true. You fell for it, hook, line and sinker!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Always gotta have that last word eh narcissist? You should really try to do better, aiming to be the board's 'mean girl' doesn't suit you.

I have not yet begun to point out your shortcomings. Please continue to stand by!

 

[Delldude]

They pulled a fast one on everyone by stating something that was true and got everyone to think that Trump was issuing illegal orders without saying it. That's a psy op. making you think something is true without saying it is true. You fell for it, hook, line and sinker!

Damn good thing you're out there on the wall, Admiral.

 

[j-mac]

I have not yet begun to point out your shortcomings. Please continue to stand by!

The true mark of a narcissist is in thinking that your opinion matters, or is relevant to anything....I don't know what you did in the Navy, or beyond, but clearly you weren't very good at it.

 

[Rawley]

Well except he didn't say that did he?

They already know that that they don't have to follow illegal orders, dipshit! You might know that if you ever served or were you asleep at the switch?

They pulled a fast one on everyone by stating something that was true and got everyone to think that Trump was issuing illegal orders without saying it. That's a psy op. making you think something is true without saying it is true. You fell for it, hook, line and sinker!

That's exactly what they said "dipshit." Your new heros were talking directly to the troops. Last I looked orders didn't come with a label "THIS IS AN ILLEGAL ORDER" THey told them it's up to the individual soldier to question whether an order from this administration is legal or illegal and they don't have to follow the illegal ones.

ALthough I'm sure you will ***** out and not answer again, but for the third and last time, if Mark Kelly went to everyone under your command and told them "you need to question every order given you by Admiral Rockwell and you don't have to follow the illegal ones."

What do you think would be the effect on discipline in your command?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The true mark of a narcissist is in thinking that your opinion matters, or is relevant to anything....I don't know what you did in the Navy, or beyond, but clearly you weren't very good at it.

That's not for you to decide, is it? Would that not be narcissistic of you for saying that?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That's exactly what they said "dipshit." Your new heros were talking directly to the troops. Last I looked orders didn't come with a label "THIS IS AN ILLEGAL ORDER" THey told them it's up to the individual soldier to question whether an order from this administration is legal or illegal and they don't have to follow the illegal ones.

ALthough I'm sure you will ***** out and not answer again, but for the third and last time, ff Mark Kelly went to everyone under your command and told them "you need to question every order given you by Admiral Rockwell and you don't have to follow the illegal ones."

What do you think would be the effect on discipline in your command?

I'll stop you after the first sentence. That is NOT what they said, Review the transcript or the video. Nothing the said mentioned Trump or that they were to question all orders. They triggered you into thinking that.

I don't answer your stupid hypotheticals because that could not and would never happen. Your entire scenario is a farce.

Tell me when you served and where? Until then I contend you are not qualified to consider anything of the sort.

 

[Rawley]

I'll stop you after the first sentence. That is NOT what they said, Review the transcript or the video. Nothing the said mentioned Trump or that they were to question all orders. They triggered you into thinking that.

I don't answer your stupid hypotheticals because that could not and would never happen. Your entire scenario is a farce.

Tell me when you served and where? Until then I contend you are not qualified to consider anything of the sort.

Such a *****

 

[skews13]

FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

FBI and DOJ working to schedule interviews with six Democratic lawmakers over controversial video encouraging military members to ignore "illegal orders."

www.foxnews.com

Time to subpoena the communications of these suspects. If they conspired to cause a mutiny within the US military, they deserve to be severely punished.

Scheduled interviews?

LOL!

 

[dblack]

He was indeed.

He was. And using him as an excuse? Even moreso.

 

[beagle9]

Pretty much sums it all up.

True.

Now if a future order were found to be illegal under military /civilian law, then not only would the soldier's understand it after a ruling is given on the hypothetical order being deemed illegal, but (they) the troops would honor the ruling along with the law in the proper manor or structural way only.

They would do this by listening to their superiors who would of course brief them on the courts findings and ruling.

Their chain of command would then instruct the troops upon what to do next, and this would be based upon the actions taken by the judges that have ruled against an order or command that they do agree jointly that such a thing was somehow unlawfully given.....

The troops would not take it upon themselves to apply "the ruling directives", otherwise in regards to the findings under the law in any way shape or form that would undermine the overall military mission and command, but only that they would wait to be instructed on this hypothetical ruling by their chain of command on what to do next as based upon the counter command given if one is needed.

After a court rules an order or command illegal, then the court would write in it's findings and briefings a directive that would be based upon it's findings that would say that the specific order is now deemed null and void by the court.

The chain of command then briefs the troops on the stand down regarding the specific order only. These proper steps secure the mission whilst removing a specific order given that has been ruled by a court that the order was not lawful under the law when given.

The fact that Trump hasn't put out an illegal order requiring the military to do something illegal, just shows how demented and political these Democrat partisan hacks are.

Trying to sew the seeds of sedition into the mind's of the military because of partisan political hatred is a very serious act and/or crime.

Now if an order was already under review by the court's, then a bipartisan warning coming from the people's reps such as in the choice of a video message would be ok I guess. It may have been more understood in it's context while an order or command was under review by a court, and then it showing heavy promise that the order may be found to be illegal by the court.

But even so, if a warning is being directed at the troops instead of going through the proper chain of command, then it was out of line...The video should have been done only to inform the chain of command that a ruling might be forthcoming by a court that would possibly deem an order or command was somehow illegally given, and a directive will follow....This is the proper structural way of doing things, and not in the opposite way in which the video seemed to suggest right ?....

The video message should have only been directed at the structural command make up of the officer core and it's general's pertaining to a court's review, and therefore it should not have been directed at the overall troop body if this was the case, otherwise by allegedly suggesting to them that a total collapse of the military should ensue if the president were to make a mistake by putting out an order that is somehow deemed illegal by mob rule (the leftist way), instead of by a court ruling in which would not undermine the overall mission of the military if it so happened that a court ruling was coming on a specfic order under review for the chain of command to follow if a ruling were to come next in authorization by the court..

TDS is real.

 

[j-mac]

That's not for you to decide, is it? Would that not be narcissistic of you for saying that?

You get what you give…

 

[DonGlock26]

He was. And using him as an excuse? Even moreso.

Excuse for what?

 

[dblack]

Excuse for what?

 

[beagle9]

No. You showed Walmart changed its offer to provide less value. You know that.

Then you cherry picked items as if no items went down last year. The deal is the full price of food is up. Its so bad Trump wont even report it.

Trump, Trump, Trump as if no one else is working to fix these thing's in government. TRUMP is the president yes, but he has a cabinet that is working diligently to fix the damage that the Democrats have broken as their directive.

Get a clue.

 

[beagle9]

Why would you need an investigation? The video is public.

Investigations are needed to understand motive and ties. Duh !!