FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

[Delldude]

How is it criminal? Every conservative on this forum apparently fell for it except me. Slotkin is CIA. Guess what they do? Every other one of the Six were former military.

Speak for yourself.

 

[Rawley]

How is it criminal?

(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

You admitted it was a psych op. It was intented was to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

You admitted it was a psych op. It was intented was to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

Sheer nuttery

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Speak for yourself.

View attachment 1188059

You fell for it, or you would agree with me 100%. I will say that you have been less overstimulated than most. For that I will give you credit.

I like your gif!

 

[Delldude]

You fell for it, or you would agree with me 100%. I will say that you have been less overstimulated than most. For that I will give you credit.

I like your gif!

Don't have to agree or disagree....... That's SOP with the dems......not hard to see.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

You admitted it was a psych op. It was intented was to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

I assume you meant "intended".

How, by stating facts every member of the military already should have already known? How many refusals to follow any orders have occurred, legal or illegal? Didn't work very well, did it?

What it did accomplish was a visceral reaction to their statement by conservatives, when the best course of action would have to say, "Yeah! So what? We do that all the time", and then just let it drop. But most people overlooked the fact that they violated no actual law because their statements were both true and in keeping with military rules and regulations that already exist. They stole the conservatives ammunition meaning responding is going to be pretty difficult since they blew it out of proportion.

Face it, Hegseth and Trump are dead wrong. By drawing attention to it by the threats of court martial and investigations, they gave all the attention the Democrats wanted. They will have to surrender when the court martial and investigation they ordered will never come to fruition, giving the Democrats a moral victory. It gives me no pleasure to say, but they fucked up and the Dems are going to break it off in their ass if they aren't careful.

 

[beagle9]

FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

FBI and DOJ working to schedule interviews with six Democratic lawmakers over controversial video encouraging military members to ignore "illegal orders."

www.foxnews.com

Time to subpoena the communications of these suspects. If they conspired to cause a mutiny within the US military, they deserve to be severely punished.

The link or connection that has to made in it all, has to be found between the illegal order assertion that suggest somehow that Trump would willingly issue an illegal order along the command structure in which Trump is currently commander and chief over, and then the actual intent of the lawmakers that are suggesting in a very strategic way that there (more than likely), will come a day when Trump is going to give an illegal order to the troops, and they absolutely will not have to follow it.

Problem - Who determines what's legal and illegal in today's "politically correct" charged atmosphere ? Democrats haven't a leg to stand on when it comes to attempting to tell other's how to react in a crisis, and especially after all the sick and disgusting crises they have caused.

Was it directed at Trumps command structure that is currently in charge of the military ?

If no illegal activity is found, then it was yet another political stunt aimed at trying to undermine the GOP in the next election.

It should come with stiff consequences for what these lawmakers attempted to pull.

 

[Rawley]

I assume you meant "intended".

How, by stating facts every member of the military already should have already known?

Absolutely. I gave you the example yesterday but you blew it off. If Mark Kelly went to everyone under your command and told them "you need to question every order given you by Admiral Rockwell and you don't have to follow the illegal ones."

What do you think would be the effect on discipline in your command?

 

[Delldude]

Pretty much sums it all up.

 

[beagle9]

Makes you wonder why these scumbags chose to make this partisan infomercial

TDS is real..

 

[DonGlock26]

The link or connection that has to made in it all, has to be found between the illegal order assertion that suggest somehow that Trump would willingly issue an illegal order along the command structure in which Trump is currently commander and chief over, and then the actual intent of the lawmakers that are suggesting in a very strategic way that there (more than likely), will come a day when Trump is going to give an illegal order to the troops, and they absolutely will not have to follow it.

Problem - Who determines what's legal and illegal in today's "politically correct" charged atmosphere ? Democrats haven't a leg to stand on when it comes to attempting to tell other's how to react in a crisis, and especially after all the sick and disgusting crises they have caused.

Was it directed at Trumps command structure that is currently in charge of the military ?

If no illegal activity is found, then it was yet another political stunt aimed at trying to undermine the GOP in the next election.

It should come with stiff consequences for what these lawmakers attempted to pull.

I think their little operation served three purposes. First, they showed their MSNBC watching base that they are "resisting" Trump.
Secondly, they are trying to foment leaks from the military/FBI to the media or Democrats. Thirdly, they are warning military and CIA leaders that there will be witch hunts to come for following Trump's orders, once the Democrats regain power.

 

[DonGlock26]

Absolutely. I gave you the example yesterday but you blew it off. If Mark Kelly went to everyone under your command and told them "you need to question every order given you by Admiral Rockwell and you don't have to follow the illegal ones."

What do you think would be the effect on discipline in your command?

 

[dblack]

TDS is real..

Sure, sure. It couldn't possibly be the case that know your following a shitstain, and just don't want to be reminded of it.

 

[DonGlock26]

 

[DonGlock26]

Sure, sure. It couldn't possibly be the case that know your following a shitstain, and just don't want to be reminded of it.

Shitstain was thrown out of power by the DNC, Obama, and Nancy Pelosi. He's shitting himself in Delaware now.

 

[dblack]

Shitstain was thrown out of power by the DNC, Obama, and Nancy Pelosi. He's shitting himself in Delaware now.

B,b,b,but Biden!

Pathetic.

 

[DonGlock26]

B,b,b,but Biden!

Pathetic.

He was indeed.

 

[Delldude]

Makes you wonder why these scumbags chose to make this partisan infomercial

Obviously to try and create divisive thoughts within the military COC.

Take it another step...............to further divide the country against this administration.

Judging from all the responses on this forum, it's working quite well.

Slotkin was CIA under Bush and Obama. She's so worried about illegal orders.

What was her involvement in the assassination of four American citizens by Obama?

 

[Delldude]

B,b,b,but Biden!

Pathetic.

Pathetic that this administration has to clean up all his loose ends.

 

[j-mac]

He's a squid. What do you expect?

He's a very intolerant, self centered, asshole. I know that...