FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

These are not the unlawful orders soldiers are trained to not obey.
The intent of the video is to put it into the soldiers' heads that they are, and to resist / disobey them.
That's a federal felony.

What evidence do you have of their intent? None.

What false statements were made in the video? None.

What chance do you have of getting a conviction? None.

Looks like a nothing burger to me.

If they left it alone, no one would have heard or done anything about it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

What was illegal about it?

They had zero probable cause but that meant nothing to Judge Boasburg who signed off on the illegal warrants and that will likely get his ass impeached and thrown off the bench if not in jail. You do know that he was the TDS-suffering judge who did this? Oh, no you didn't!

You need to learn your topic before shooting off your mouth and questioning your betters.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I think you under estimate our military......it is illegal for them to not follow lawful orders, and equally illegal to follow unlawful orders.

The 6 were clearly speaking of the latter, unlawful orders, of which many in the military have never and WILL never see....but if they do, they must disobey the unlawful order.

An example would be Trump ordering the military/National guard in to cities in the United States or anywhere within the U.S. to perform domestic law enforcement duties.....

See? You are proving my point!
This is NOT an unlawful order of the sort troops are trained to not obey.
The intent of the videos is to put it into the soldiers' heads that it is, and to resist / disobey it.
It certainly already put that idea into YOUR head.

If you refuse to obey a deployment or movement order to Portland you will be punished under the UCMJ.
If you advise, counsel, or urge a serviceman to refuse to obey such an order, you commit a federal felony.

 

[Delldude]

When did I say about the free speech rights of active military?

I had asked you a question about it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

See? You are proving my point.
This is NOT an unlawful order of the sort troops are trained to not obey.
The intent of the videos is to put it into the soldiers' heads that they are, and to resist / disobey them.

If you refuse to obey a deployment or movement order to Portland you will be punished under the UCMJ.
If you advise, counsel, or urge someone to refuse to obey such an order, you commit a federal felony.

Well, except for the little fact that video did not do any of that. Please quote the video where that happened. It only exists in the mind of those victims of Slotkin and crew's psy op.

 

[konradv]

See? You are proving my point.
This is NOT an unlawful order of the sort troops are trained to not obey.
The intent of the videos is to put it into the soldiers' heads that they are, and to resist / disobey them.

If you refuse to obey a deployment or movement order to Portland you will be punished under the UCMJ.
If you advise, counsel, or urge someone to refuse to obey such an order, you commit a federal felony.

The intent is to remind soldiers of their oath. MAGA wants you to forget that the military's primary loyalty isn’t to Trump.

 

[Marener]

I had asked you a question about it.

Active military can’t say whatever they want. There are a lot of rules about it.

What does your question have to do with the topic?

 

[SweetTea]

Why? It's a rerun.

Incompetent cultists put on a show for low IQ supporters.

The end.

Oh please. These lawmakers made this statement in an attempt to entice some low IQ Democrats into not following orders.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Oh please. These lawmakers made this statement in an attempt to entice some low IQ Democrats into not following orders.

It has certainly had the intended effect on low IQ Democrats, all of whom mindlessly chant the same thing.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Bacon on Hegseth threatening Kelly: ‘Amateur hour once again’​

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5621596-don-bacon-pete-hegseth-mark-kelly-threats/?tbref=hp

 

[Care4all]

See? You are proving my point!
This is NOT an unlawful order of the sort troops are trained to not obey.
The intent of the videos is to put it into the soldiers' heads that it is, and to resist / disobey it.
It certainly already put that idea into YOUR head.

If you refuse to obey a deployment or movement order to Portland you will be punished under the UCMJ.
If you advise, counsel, or urge a serviceman to refuse to obey such an order, you commit a federal felony.

It didn't put it in my head, constitutional lawyers debating the issue in the 24/7 for the past several months did...

I never saw the video, and if it weren't for y'all posting it here making a commotion and outright lying about it, I never would have known it existed....

 

[Delldude]

Active military can’t say whatever they want. There are a lot of rules about it.

What does your question have to do with the topic?

Everything.

 

[Marener]

Everything.

So you say

 

[Marener]

Oh please. These lawmakers made this statement in an attempt to entice some low IQ Democrats into not following orders.

Yet again, conservatives show their disdain for the military.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Care4all]

M14 Shooter

'People Are Very Scared': Trump Administration Purge of JAG Officers Raises Legal, Ethical Fears​

The Commanding General for the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, Brig. Gen. Joseph B. Berger III, talks to a group of paralegal specialists during Paralegal Warrior Training Course at Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, July 20, 2019. (U.S. Army Reserve photo by Sgt. Jose A. Torres Jr.)


Military.com | By Thomas Novelly and Konstantin Toropin
Published February 24, 2025 at 6:22pm ET

Current military lawyers and legal experts told Military.com the administration's firings of the Air Force, Army and Navy's top judge advocates general politicizes and sets an alarming precedent for a crucial job in the military, all as President Donald Trump has mused about using the military in unorthodox and potentially illegal ways.

Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced late Friday evening the firings of the top legal officers for the military services -- those responsible for ensuring the Uniform Code of Military Justice is followed by commanders -- as well as the Joint Chiefs chairman, the Navy's top officer and Air Force vice chief.

As part of the judge advocates general purge, Air Force Lt. Gen. Charles Plummer and Army Lt. Gen. Joseph Berger were fired. Navy Rear Adm. Lia Reynolds remains in the position because she was already performing the duties of the top lawyer for the sea service following the resignation of Vice Adm. Christopher French late last year. French had been in the job as the Navy's top lawyer for just a few months.

Hegseth told reporters Monday that the removals were necessary because he didn't want them to pose any "roadblocks to orders that are given by a commander in chief."

 

[SweetTea]

Yet again, conservatives show their disdain for the military.

On the contrary, we don’t think sewing discord by undermining authority is beneficial to our military.

 

[Delldude]

Yesterday it was Patel today Bondi.....LOL

Day's of our lives.....

 

[Marener]

On the contrary, we don’t think sewing discord by undermining authority is beneficial to our military.

You just called members of the military stupid.

 

[Delldude]

So you say

Why no interviews with active military on the subject by MSM?

Surely there's a few good men out there.