FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse 'illegal orders'

Notice they can't even imagine or invent one possible relevant thing this farce of an investigation might uncover.

Not one single thing. Because they haven't thought that far. They are compulsively behaving per their programming.
 
What the **** are you investigating? What is the crime? Without a crime, you are on a fishing expedition. The video provides zero evidence of a crime. What are you trying to prove?

There's no need to use obscenities. Investigating a possible criminal conspiracy is a legitimate law enforcement function.

You admitted that their intent was "evil". So what do you think they were trying to do?
 
Notice they can't even imagine or invent one possible relevant thing this farce of an investigation might uncover.

Not one single thing. Because they haven't thought that far. They are compulsively behaving per their programming.

Not true.
 
Agreed. But none of that is criminal in any way. Evil intent? Definitely. Illegal? Not likely.
Then that is what the investigation will show. If you don't mind, I'll wait for the investigation to play out and then make up my mind.

That is exactly what they are doing. They are looking for a crime to hand on them because they have nothing at present.
They have a retired officer encouraging service people to disobey the commander in Chief, using his rank as his authority for that advice. He's in much more legal danger than Slotkin and the others, so he may have to turn on them to get leniency.

It will be interesting to hear how the discussions leading up to this abortion went.

Why are you Democrats so frightened of questions?
 
There's no need to use obscenities. Investigating a possible criminal conspiracy is a legitimate law enforcement function.

You admitted that their intent was "evil". So what do you think they were trying to do?
What crime are you investigating? Criminal conspiracy to do what? What is your evidence?
 
15th post
Then that is what the investigation will show. If you don't mind, I'll wait for the investigation to play out and then make up my mind.


They have a retired officer encouraging service people to disobey the commander in Chief, using his rank as his authority for that advice. He's in much more legal danger than Slotkin and the others, so he may have to turn on them to get leniency.

It will be interesting to hear how the discussions leading up to this abortion went.

Why are you Democrats so frightened of questions?
No, he didn't. Quote what he said in the video. Nothing was illegal or encouraged people to disobey lawful orders.

How is he going to turn on them? He is being investigated by the military for invoking his rank is all they will likely get him on. That's a letter of reprimand at best.

Why should have access to private emails or text messages unless you have a crime? Warrants require the crime be specified and what you are looking for!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom