FBI Resurrects Corruption

[Flanders]

FBI credibility alone smells fishy since liberals did not trust the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover when it actually served the American people rather than cover up for federal government big shots. Now, suddenly, media liberals are in love with James Comey & Company.

The Lesser Bore​

Whatever J. Edgar Hoover did with the FBI the stench of rotting fish returned more overpowering than it was in 1924 under the FBI’s putrid predecessor —— the Bureau of Investigation.

As false as the Bureau of Investigation was it never protected traitors, nor did Hoover’s bureau protect America-haters like Hillary Clinton in all the years he ran the FBI (1924 - 1972).

Obviously, the Department of Justice is still corruption’s best friend as it was in the years that made Hoover’s FBI necessary:

​

The Justice Department has granted immunity to a grand total of five individuals involved in the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

On Friday, the FBI, in response to a subpoena, gave the House Oversight Committee information about immunity agreements reached as part of the Clinton email investigation. The list included a total of five names, including two Clinton attorneys.​

The Immunized Five: Meet The People Covering For Hillary
Chuck Ross
9:24 PM 09/23/2016

The Immunized Five: Meet The People Covering For Hillary​

 

[Freewill]

FBI credibility alone smells fishy since liberals did not trust the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover when it actually served the American people rather than cover up for federal government big shots. Now, suddenly, media liberals are in love with James Comey & Company.

The Lesser Bore​

Whatever J. Edgar Hoover did with the FBI the stench of rotting fish returned more overpowering than it was in 1924 under the FBI’s putrid predecessor —— the Bureau of Investigation.

As false as the Bureau of Investigation was it never protected traitors, nor did Hoover’s bureau protect America-haters like Hillary Clinton in all the years he ran the FBI (1924 - 1972).

Obviously, the Department of Justice is still corruption’s best friend as it was in the years that made Hoover’s FBI necessary:

​

The Justice Department has granted immunity to a grand total of five individuals involved in the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

On Friday, the FBI, in response to a subpoena, gave the House Oversight Committee information about immunity agreements reached as part of the Clinton email investigation. The list included a total of five names, including two Clinton attorneys.​

The Immunized Five: Meet The People Covering For Hillary
Chuck Ross
9:24 PM 09/23/2016

The Immunized Five: Meet The People Covering For Hillary​

First of all Hoover wasn't that honest or clean. He kept files on every politician for the sole purpose of maintaining his power. How else would a homosexual stay in his position in a time when homosexuals were fairly ostracized.

Immunity is usually given not to protect someone but to force a person to testify. With immunity the fifth amendment no longer has the force it does without immunity.

What Comey did was a travesty of justice. 10 minutes he tells us why she was guilty then says "so what" because she didn't have intent, intent not written into law. Then he tells us that Hillary lied to Congress. What happened with that bit of information? Nothing.

The establishment protects their own and Hillary personifies the establishment.

I think that when Trump wins the first thing he should do is not go after Hillary but he should fire Comey. But then again Comey may have some photos of Trump that Trump doesn't want out, just like in the Hoover days.

 

[Flanders]

First of all Hoover wasn't that honest or clean. He kept files on every politician for the sole purpose of maintaining his power.

To Freewill: I hold a different opinion of Hoover for a number of reasons.

First, whatever Hoover did to the scum in government benefitted the American people.

Secondly,

. . . the CIA is a casualty of J. Edgar Hoover’s long-running battle against American Communists. Creating the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, eliminated the possibility of another Hoover keeping Democrat traitors in line. That, in turn, diminished the CIA’s ability to defend this country in foreign lands whenever the CIA sets operations in motion to protect the country might interfere with Democrat foreign policies. Put it this way. If Democrats had control during the Cold War everyone would be speaking Russian today.

The Intelligence Community’s New Face​

Bottom line: Neither Leon Panetta, nor John Brennan, would have become CIA Director when Hoover was running the FBI.

CIA Director Once Voted for Communist Presidential Candidate
BY: Natalie Johnson
September 21, 2016 4:58 pm

CIA Director Once Voted for Communist Presidential Candidate​

I have to wonder how close Brennan was to the old Communist sympathizer Leon Panetta when he, Panetta, was CIA Director, and when he later became secretary of defense?

The Wall Nobody Talks About​

How else would a homosexual stay in his position in a time when homosexuals were fairly ostracized.

To Freewill: The Left claimed Hoover was a cross-dresser after he died. They did not have the courage to say it when he was living.

There was never any proof of Hoover’s homosexuality, nor is there evidence of Hoover using the FBI to advance special Rights for the gay community over the Rights of heterosexual Americans.

Incidentally, take a quick look at how far the homosexual agenda has come in just the past 8 years. Start with witnesses:

Claim: Obama hid 'gay life' to become president
Chicago homosexual community shocked he could keep it secret
Published: 09/11/2012 at 9:53 PM
by JEROME CORSI

Claim: Obama hid ‘gay life’ to become president​

Immunity is usually given not to protect someone but to force a person to testify. With immunity the fifth amendment no longer has the force it does without immunity.

To Freewill: True enough in the past. Today, immunity is used to reward foot soldiers for keeping their mouths shut rather than help the FBI scoop up a big shot.

What Comey did was a travesty of justice. 10 minutes he tells us why she was guilty then says "so what" because she didn't have intent, intent not written into law. Then he tells us that Hillary lied to Congress. What happened with that bit of information? Nothing.

To Freewill: I cannot argue with that except to say that Comey had a lot of company in the DoJ and in Congress.

The establishment protects their own and Hillary personifies the establishment.

To Freewill: The dangerous part is that the protection includes maggots on the lowest level when they lack the wealth to beat the rap like the Clintons. Note that private sector AMERICANS who cannot afford high-priced lawyers still end up in jail.

I think that when Trump wins the first thing he should do is not go after Hillary but he should fire Comey.

To Freewill: I agree. Unfortunately, Department of Justice corruption has become so deeply entrenched it only takes a few Democrats in Congress to derail Hillary’s prosecution.

But then again Comey may have some photos of Trump that Trump doesn't want out, just like in the Hoover days.

To Freewill: I do not think so. If he had them either he or Loretta Lynch would have "leaked" them before now.

Finally:

I will close with a few words about J. Edgar Hoover (1895 - 1972) and Joseph McCarthy (1908 - 1957). Two men Democrats hate more than they hate Richard Nixon. Here is what they have in common that causes so much hatred among liberals:

1. Both man stood up to the federal government from within. Hoover’s never-found files on Democrats kept the worst of them in line for decades. Hoover’s death gave Democrats the green light that eventually punished the country with the Clintons and Taqiyya the Liar. (Imagine the field day Hoover would have had with the Clintons and the Chicago sewer rat.)

McCarthy went after Communists infiltrating government bureaucracies including the US Army. Senator McCarthy’s only mistake was not understanding the difference between hardcore Communists and “Americans” betraying their country for global government administered by the United Nations. The tragedy is that both end in the same place.

NOTE: The names listed in the Venona papers represent a mixture of outright traitors and those betraying the country for the United Nations.

List of Americans in the Venona papers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. Neither Hoover or McCarthy ever did or said anything to harm the American people. Not one contemporary Democrat can make that claim.

Janet Napolitano’s Rap Sheet

 

[Freewill]

First of all Hoover wasn't that honest or clean. He kept files on every politician for the sole purpose of maintaining his power.

To Freewill: I hold a different opinion of Hoover for a number of reasons.

First, whatever Hoover did to the scum in government benefitted the American people.

Secondly,

. . . the CIA is a casualty of J. Edgar Hoover’s long-running battle against American Communists. Creating the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, eliminated the possibility of another Hoover keeping Democrat traitors in line. That, in turn, diminished the CIA’s ability to defend this country in foreign lands whenever the CIA sets operations in motion to protect the country might interfere with Democrat foreign policies. Put it this way. If Democrats had control during the Cold War everyone would be speaking Russian today.

The Intelligence Community’s New Face​

Bottom line: Neither Leon Panetta, nor John Brennan, would have become CIA Director when Hoover was running the FBI.

CIA Director Once Voted for Communist Presidential Candidate
BY: Natalie Johnson
September 21, 2016 4:58 pm

CIA Director Once Voted for Communist Presidential Candidate​

I have to wonder how close Brennan was to the old Communist sympathizer Leon Panetta when he, Panetta, was CIA Director, and when he later became secretary of defense?

The Wall Nobody Talks About​

How else would a homosexual stay in his position in a time when homosexuals were fairly ostracized.

To Freewill: The Left claimed Hoover was a cross-dresser after he died. They did not have the courage to say it when he was living.

There was never any proof of Hoover’s homosexuality, nor is there evidence of Hoover using the FBI to advance special Rights for the gay community over the Rights of heterosexual Americans.

Incidentally, take a quick look at how far the homosexual agenda has come in just the past 8 years. Start with witnesses:

Claim: Obama hid 'gay life' to become president
Chicago homosexual community shocked he could keep it secret
Published: 09/11/2012 at 9:53 PM
by JEROME CORSI

Claim: Obama hid ‘gay life’ to become president​

Immunity is usually given not to protect someone but to force a person to testify. With immunity the fifth amendment no longer has the force it does without immunity.

To Freewill: True enough in the past. Today, immunity is used to reward foot soldiers for keeping their mouths shut rather than help the FBI scoop up a big shot.

What Comey did was a travesty of justice. 10 minutes he tells us why she was guilty then says "so what" because she didn't have intent, intent not written into law. Then he tells us that Hillary lied to Congress. What happened with that bit of information? Nothing.

To Freewill: I cannot argue with that except to say that Comey had a lot of company in the DoJ and in Congress.

The establishment protects their own and Hillary personifies the establishment.

To Freewill: The dangerous part is that the protection includes maggots on the lowest level when they lack the wealth to beat the rap like the Clintons. Note that private sector AMERICANS who cannot afford high-priced lawyers still end up in jail.

I think that when Trump wins the first thing he should do is not go after Hillary but he should fire Comey.

To Freewill: I agree. Unfortunately, Department of Justice corruption has become so deeply entrenched it only takes a few Democrats in Congress to derail Hillary’s prosecution.

But then again Comey may have some photos of Trump that Trump doesn't want out, just like in the Hoover days.

To Freewill: I do not think so. If he had them either he or Loretta Lynch would have "leaked" them before now.

Finally:

I will close with a few words about J. Edgar Hoover (1895 - 1972) and Joseph McCarthy (1908 - 1957). Two men Democrats hate more than they hate Richard Nixon. Here is what they have in common that causes so much hatred among liberals:

1. Both man stood up to the federal government from within. Hoover’s never-found files on Democrats kept the worst of them in line for decades. Hoover’s death gave Democrats the green light that eventually punished the country with the Clintons and Taqiyya the Liar. (Imagine the field day Hoover would have had with the Clintons and the Chicago sewer rat.)

McCarthy went after Communists infiltrating government bureaucracies including the US Army. Senator McCarthy’s only mistake was not understanding the difference between hardcore Communists and “Americans” betraying their country for global government administered by the United Nations. The tragedy is that both end in the same place.

NOTE: The names listed in the Venona papers represent a mixture of outright traitors and those betraying the country for the United Nations.

List of Americans in the Venona papers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. Neither Hoover or McCarthy ever did or said anything to harm the American people. Not one contemporary Democrat can make that claim.

Janet Napolitano’s Rap Sheet

Thank you for the rational reply.

Immunity, is granted by the prosecution not the defense. If an underling knows something but pleads the 5th then immunity could be granted so that the 5th no longer applies. There is no other reason to grant immunity.

Never the less, unless there is a conviction the left will just keep claiming Hillary is innocent. They must also thin Capone is innocent except for tax evasion.

 

[Flanders]

If an underling knows something but pleads the 5th then immunity could be granted so that the 5th no longer applies.

To Freewill: True, but use of the 5th has become a public relations gimmick; an excuse to give the FBI a reason to grant immunity. Ultimately, the 5th is meaningless leverage when the Department of Justice has no intention of prosecuting.

Note that Lois Learner pleaded the 5th to a congressional committee —— AFTER she made a statement. Abuse of the 5th by government employees is a joke before Congress, and in criminal investigations à la the Clintons.

Never the less, unless there is a conviction the left will just keep claiming Hillary is innocent.

To Freewill: There is not a chance Hillary will be convicted of anything and she knows it.

Speaking of Hillary consider this. Illegal aliens and United Nations refugee steal the presidency and/or the US Senate. Wealthy Democrats responsible for the theft are arrested. They plead the 5th.

Here comes the best part. A handful of illegal aliens and refugees who voted illegally are arrested. They are given immunity if they testify against the crooks, but only after they plead the 5th. Think about that scenario for a while.

Gheen believes Democrats are illegally registering large numbers of immigrants – legal and illegal – to vote even though they’re not eligible because they don’t have full U.S. citizenship. He said the safeguards against this type of fraudulent practice are virtually nonexistent in most states.

“They’re getting them here to vote. No one is checking to make sure they are citizens when they register these immigrants,” Gheen said.

When he brought up this point on Fox News in 2010, Gheen said he was never invited back on the network.

“I was banned from Fox News after that,” he told WND.

Although it’s a felony for non-citizens to register to vote, no one is checking to make sure migrants aren’t being encouraged to lie and check the little box designating themselves as citizens, he said.

Soros instigating pre-election 'surge' at border
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 09/14/2016 @ 7:20 pm

Soros instigating pre-election ‘surge’ at border​

 

[Flanders]

UPDATE ​

Neither Leon Panetta, nor John Brennan, would have become CIA Director when Hoover was running the FBI.

Where have all the good guys gone?

. . . it’s a mindblower that we have a CIA director who was apparently once a communist or voted communist — no doubt prompting Bill Casey and Allen Dulles to flip in their graves.​

The worst is yet to come:

Remember Obama’s communications director, Anita Dunn? She cited as inspirations her “two favorite political philosophers,” Mother Teresa and, naturally, Mao Tse-tung.

Now there, in Ms. Dunn, was a revolutionary thinker. Obama sure knows how to pick ‘em.​

Did Barack Obama Vote Communist in 1980?
Paul Kengor
September 27, 2016, 12:14 am

Did Barack Obama Vote Communist in 1980? | The American Spectator​

Obama succeeding Ban Ki-moon is worse than average Americans can imagine:

A Superior January

More details here:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?p=9191817

The way the debate went last night, I am not sure if Trump will veto Obama. I am absolutely certain that Mike Pence will applaud Secretary General Barrack Obama. Bottom line: Neither one has shown the courage it requires to challenge the New World Order crowd.

 

[the_human_being]

FBI Director James Comey EXPOSED: Received millions from Clinton Foundation, on their Corporate Partner Board, brother works for law firm that does Clinton Foundation taxes