Janet Napolitano’s Rap Sheet

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Be forewarned. This message is not for bumper-sticker mentalities.

Does any Democrat bureaucrat ever tell Congress the truth about anything? Answer: They can refuse to testify. They say ‘No Comment’ to dangerous questions, or they can lie. They always choose the last one.


Haney brought the information to the attention of the House Committee on Homeland Security, and later that week, Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., confronted then-DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano with it.

Citing the DHS slogan “If you see something, say something,” Duncan asked why someone who not only was at the scene of the bombing, but also described by authorities as a person of interest in the case, was about to be deported.

An indignant Napolitano refused to answer, ridiculing Duncan for asking a question she said was “so full of misstatements and misapprehensions that it’s just not worthy of an answer.”

DHS officer: Janet Napolitano deceived Congress about Boston bombing
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 05/23/2016 @ 8:40 pm

DHS officer: Janet Napolitano deceived Congress about Boston bombing

Let’s review Janet Napolitano. In light of the latest revelation I will begin on a light note. It is fair to say that Napolitano was feeding terrorists as far back as 2012:

"Your failure to respond to our oversight request is deeply troubling, and suggests that your Department is attempting to conceal information from the American people," Sens. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) wrote to Napolitano on Wednesday.

XXXXX

The four senators wrote to Napolitano in August to ask a series of questions about whether DHS is properly assessing whether immigrants are likely to require government assistance. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), officials are supposed to deny U.S. entry to immigrants who are likely to need federal aid.

They wrote their August letter after reports that the U.S. Department of Agriculture was encouraging Mexican citizens to emigrate to the U.S. and enroll in the federal food stamp program.

"We were thus shocked to discover that both the State Department and DHS exclude reliance on almost all governmental welfare programs when evaluating whether an alien is likely to become a public charge," they wrote in August.

Republicans accuse Napolitano of hiding info on immigration enforcement
By Pete Kasperowicz - 09/26/12 11:19 AM ET

Republicans accuse Napolitano of hiding info on immigration enforcement

Let us now move onto the more serious activities on Napolitano’s rap sheet.


The FedBizOpps.gov website reports that the TSA is seeking to purchase nearly 3.5 million rounds of .347 SIG caliber training ammunition. Weapons experts told WND the .347 is an unknown caliber, and the document likely contained a mistake, instead intending to reference a .357 caliber.

But then-Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano admitted that the federal government was drying up ammunition supplies.

She was asked by a House panel about the huge government purchases, estimated to be in the range of 1.6 billion rounds, enough for many years of war at the rate ammunition is used by the U.S. military.

Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., wanted to know whether the reports were accurate.

“This was a five-year strategic sourcing contract for up to one-point-whatever billion rounds,” she confirmed.

Calculations done by the Washington Examiner suggest the reported 1.6 billion rounds would be enough for “something like a 24-year supply of ammunition on hand.”

Other consumers of ammunition, however, from the weekend hunter to police departments, are finding the shelves bare.​

Ron Paul predicted BLM overreach 17 years ago
'There was never meant to be a federal police force'
Posted By Bob Unruh On 04/28/2014 @ 8:03 pm

Ron Paul predicted BLM overreach 17 years ago

The Chicago sewer rat gave Napolitano the job; so let us take a look at him in relation to her:

Taqiyya the Liar granting illegal aliens immunity is making law as well as nullifying existing law.

Not enforcing immigration laws is a stopgap policy at best. You know that Congress will stick their heads up their collective ass, make a little noise, and do nothing about their supreme legislator.

Parenthetically, I assume Latinos think Taqiyya the Liar’s non-law is just wonderful for them. Before they get too comfortable with non-laws they should listen to what a man for all seasons has to say about cutting down laws —— Thomas More could be talking to Taqiyya the Liar:


A Man for All Seasons - The Devil Speech

Don’t you just love prosecutorial discretion in a “nation of laws”? What this country needs is a nation of enforced laws. If picking and choosing is the new norm stop writing laws altogether.

More to the point, the guy who gave her the job she abused has been a parasite all of his life. He is the first president born into the parasite class. His entire life was lived in the company of parasites; he is the model for every parasite lusting after a government job. His entire Administration represents the parasite class. So why did he choose Napolitano? The answer is obvious.

Janet Napolitano is a lawyer who has been in government much of her adult life. Her father was in higher education; so she easily qualifies as a second generation parasite. I do not know who paid for her higher education, but common sense tells me it was taxpayers.

NOTE: After betraying the country when she was running the DHS she moved into a parasite’s dream job —— President of the University of California.

THE CHILDREN


Gooney bird is another name for albatross. If ever there was an albatross around a country’s neck Taqiyya the Liar is it.

One of the weirdest birds in the flock says this:


“Young people who were brought to the United States through no fault of their own as children, who meet several key criteria, will no longer be removed from the country or entered into removal proceedings,” Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in a conference call with reporters on Friday morning.

Like everything the Democrats do, they did it for the children.

Is Obama making himself ‘legal’ in removing 800,000 illegal immigrants from deportation?
Judi McLeod Monday, June 18, 2012

Is Obama making himself ‘legal’ in removing 800,000 illegal immigrants from deportation?

Amnesty for the “children” should be called “Incremental Amnesty.” Granting amnesty to the “children” opens the door to full amnesty for every illegal. Never forget that Democrats undermine the country incrementally. Amnesty for the “children” is no different.

No matter the pretense, amnesty for illegals tells every Muslim terrorist in the world they won’t be deported once they get here. Once here, they only have to wait until the next group-amnesty is granted, or blow something up —— whichever comes first.

The insult is when a character like Janet Napolitano talked about the contributions immigrants made to our country she included ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS without telling us what those contributions are.


WASHINGTON — The Obama administration will stop deporting and begin granting work permits to younger illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and have since led law-abiding lives.

XXXXX

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was to announce the new policy Friday, one week before President Barack Obama plans to address the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials' annual conference in Orlando, Fla. Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney is scheduled to speak to the group on Thursday.

Under the administration plan, illegal immigrants will be immune from deportation if they were brought to the United States before they turned 16 and are younger than 30, have been in the country for at least five continuous years, have no criminal history, graduated from a U.S. high school or earned a GED, or served in the military. They also can apply for a work permit that will be good for two years with no limits on how many times it can be renewed.​

When Janet Napolitano talked about illegal aliens making contributions to the country she meant contributions to the parasite class.

"Many of these young people have already contributed to our country in significant ways," Napolitano wrote in a memorandum describing the administration's action. "Prosecutorial discretion, which is used in so many other areas, is especially justified here."

Obama administration to offer immunity to certain illegals
By Alicia A. Caldwell and Jim Kuhnhenn-Associated Press
Friday, June 15, 2012

Obama administration to offer immunity to certain illegal immigrants

What would talk about Democrats be without a sex scandal?:

This week, the names of two of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano's gal pals surfaced in a mortifying, Animal House-style scandal. If the allegations of whistleblowers pan out, DHS may soon be known as DSH: The Department of Sexual Harassment.

The Liberal Sisterhood of the Plundering Hacks
Michelle Malkin
Aug 17, 2012

The Liberal Sisterhood of the Plundering Hacks

I always thought it is illogical to assume there were no morally corrupt females in Congress simply because none were ever outed. Any institution that assumes moral superiority by force naturally attracts the most morally depraved individuals.

Secretary Janet Napolitano was not a member of Congress, but she and her gal pals represented the first sex scandal in history I am aware of. A scandal that exposed depraved females in the upper echelons of government. Happily, now that the dam broke it won’t be long before the ladies in Congress get the equal treatment they claim they want.

The most troubling aspect of depraved ladies in high places is that they are usually Hillary Clinton feminists who would send American men to die fighting in foreign lands for human Rights. In fact: A female degenerate’s Right to govern includes the authority to send soldiers to die for the United Nation’ agenda. That is the governing Right they are after.

Parenthetically, creating the Department of Homeland Security ranks as one of the worst mistakes Congress ever made.


Back at the height of the Cold War long, years before personal computers were invented, I knew one thing above everything else: Never let Democrats come anywhere near an intelligence agency. Today, Democrats control the entire intelligence community through the Director of National Intelligence. God only knows what Democrats are doing to the country in the Department of Homeland Security.

XXXXX

Parenthetically, the CIA is a casualty of J. Edgar Hoover’s long-running battle against American Communists. Creating the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, eliminated the possibility of another Hoover keeping Democrat traitors in line. That, in turn, diminished the CIA’s ability to defend this country in foreign lands whenever the CIA sets operations in motion to protect the country might interfere with Democrat foreign policies. Put it this way. If Democrats had control during the Cold War everyone would be speaking Russian today.

The Intelligence Community’s New Face

I will close with a few words about J. Edgar Hoover (1895 - 1972) and Joseph McCarthy (1908 - 1957). Two men Democrats hate more than they hate Richard Nixon. Here is what they have in common that causes so much hatred among liberals:

1. Both man stood up to the federal government from within. Hoover’s never-found files on Democrats kept the worst of them in line for decades. Hoover’s death gave Democrats the green light that eventually punished the country with the Clintons and Taqiyya the Liar. (Imagine the field day Hoover would have had with the Clintons and the Chicago sewer rat.)

McCarthy went after Communists infiltrating government bureaucracies including the US Army. Senator McCarthy’s only mistake was not understanding the difference between hardcore Communists and “Americans” betraying their country for global government administered by the United Nations. The tragedy is that both end in the same place.

NOTE: The names listed in the Venona papers represent a mixture of outright traitors and those betraying the country for the United Nations.


List of Americans in the Venona papers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. Neither Hoover or McCarthy ever did or said anything to harm the American people. Not one contemporary Democrat can make that claim.
 
He is not an American in his heart and soul. He may not even be eligible to be the president but that aside...his heart ain't in it. He hates America so as far as I'm concerned he is not a very good American regardless as to where his mamma spit him out.
 
Obama Rouhani Friendly Iran Nuclear Deal Cartoon.jpg
 
Chris Christie is all well and good, but firing presidential appointees is not good enough:

Reuters is reporting that New Jersey Governor Chris Christie told Trump donors in a closed door meeting that the nominee would seek to reform the Civil Service Act to make it easier to fire Obama political appointees.​

July 20, 2016
Trump looking to purge Obama political appointees if he wins
By Rick Moran

Blog: Trump looking to purge Obama political appointees if he wins

No president hires the tens of thousands working in federal bureaucracies. Abolishing government unions is the problem. Government unions —— thanks to JFK —— make it impossible to fire a misnamed “Civil Servant” irrespective of what they do:
Does any Democrat bureaucrat ever tell Congress the truth about anything? Answer: They can refuse to testify. They say ‘No Comment’ to dangerous questions, or they can lie. They always choose the last one.
Even if Trump shutdown worthless, bloated, bureaucracies like the Department of Education he would have to fire 75 percent of all federal employees across the board in order to make a dent in the problem.

Dumping presidential appointees who head bureaucracies is not a problem at all. They depart anyway whenever a new president takes office. Can you imagine an America First president keeping Gina McCarthy in charge of the EPA? Or Jeh Johnson remaining at Homeland Security?

NOTE: Government unions will never again make the mistake they made with Ronald Reagan:


Reagan fires 11,359 air-traffic controllers - Aug 05, 1981 - HISTORY.com
 
I remember retired flag officers lining up behind Bill Clinton, a draft dodger, over George H.W. Bush, a war hero. Military readiness was not an issue. I admired some of those generals and couldn’t understand why they would make such a poor choice. The answer was that they wanted jobs. A leader of that effort became an ambassador to the United Kingdom. Later, we saw retired flag officers lining up behind Hillary Clinton over John McCain, a war hero. Military readiness was still not an issue. There were no jobs that time, but they picked a loser in 2008. Now the retired flag officer cabal is back again for Hillary, hoping she will win this time and hire some of them. Military readiness is the issue, and the conduct of these officers is ignoble.​

America's most decorated living soldier's case against Hillary
Posted By Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady On 08/14/2016 @ 4:16 pm

America’s most decorated living soldier’s case against Hillary

General Brady is right about retired flag officers coming out for Hillary Clinton, although it is about more than jobs. I would ask where their loyalties were when they were still in uniform:
McCarthy went after Communists infiltrating government bureaucracies including the US Army. Senator McCarthy’s only mistake was not understanding the difference between hardcore Communists and “Americans” betraying their country for global government administered by the United Nations. The tragedy is that both end in the same place.
A few commanders in chief have been betraying this country for the United Nations since the end of WW II. Hillary Clinton will certainly take betrayal to new depths. She got away with so many lies and criminal acts it is only logical that she put her experience to outright betrayal knowing she will get away with more than did her husband and Obama.
 
The problem comes in when Democrats accommodate their agenda without altering the Constitution the correct way. Their greatest coup was selling the idea that the Constitution is a living, breathing, document


Add this to her rap sheet:

Napolitano calls for 'living, breathing' borders
By Mariana Barillas • 9/1/16 2:49 PM

Napolitano calls for 'living, breathing' borders
 
UPDATE

I hope to hell she did not pocket the dough!

Patrick McGreevy of the Los Angeles Times reports:​

The administration of the University of California system pays top workers salaries and benefits significantly higher than that of similar state employees, and failed to disclose to the Board of Regents and the public that it had $175 million in budget reserve funds while it was seeking to raise tuition, a state audit found Tuesday.​

April 26, 2017
State audit slams Janet Napolitano’s office of University of California president
By Thomas Lifson

Blog: State audit slams Janet Napolitano’s office of University of California president
 
UPDATE

I hope to hell she did not pocket the dough!

Patrick McGreevy of the Los Angeles Times reports:​

The administration of the University of California system pays top workers salaries and benefits significantly higher than that of similar state employees, and failed to disclose to the Board of Regents and the public that it had $175 million in budget reserve funds while it was seeking to raise tuition, a state audit found Tuesday.​

April 26, 2017
State audit slams Janet Napolitano’s office of University of California president
By Thomas Lifson

Blog: State audit slams Janet Napolitano’s office of University of California president
These damn liberals feel they can do whatever they want and since the media is on their side they won't get caught.
 

Forum List

Back
Top