FBI Raid On Trump's Mar-A-Lago Had No Valid Legal Basis

[Care4all]

Actually I did.

Nowhere does it say he authorized or even had advance knowledge of the raid.

It says he knew about the issue and enabled the investigation.

That’s not news. “I” new about the issue … it’s been public knowledge for almost two years. That he enabled the investigation is not news either

The raid itself was not anything he knew about or controlled

If he had, there was no worse week, for Garland to do it....

The whole week was suppose to be about democrats celebrating their legislative victories, instead it was all trump chaos....and it was the Eve of an important primary.

 

[Billy_Bob]

For what crime?

Conspiracy to commit fraud, to entrap. It's called manufacturing a crime... Something you all are very well versed at doing or attempting to do...

 

[Pete7469]

Nope! I just read the news...I'm an avid reader, and obsessive researcher.... Boring stuff to most, but I enjoy it!

That's so cute....

You read the "news" and believe it. How many bridges do you own?



.

 

[Pete7469]

Conspiracy to commit fraud, to entrap. It's called manufacturing a crime... Something you all are very well versed at doing or attempting to do...

That's just old playbook stuff for leftists...




For whatever reason they took Orwell's warnings for instructions. Fortunately they're usually the first victims of their own cults.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The article is hogwash!

The presidential records are REQUIRED under law to be kept by the National Archives.

The former president has free access for the 5 years, before the public has access.

But the current president, and congress, and doj can access them during that 5 years, if there is a need. They can't get access, when in need, if Trump has them.

And under no condition, none, zip, zero....can a former president store TOP SECRET SCI national security compartmental documents at Mara Lago Resort, or anywhere outside of their secure place in the government safe.

The presidential records were never his records to take with him.

The presidential records act is CLEAR on that.....

Do you think Biden should be held to the same standards?

 

[struth]

If a tree falls in the forest does it make a noise? Yes… unless the tree is nowhere to be found.

If no one witnessed Trump declassifying documents… it didn’t happen

the president isn’t a tree. Your lack of knowledge of it being classified or not doesn’t change the law

 

[jc456]

Meh. Couple lawyers hoping to drum up business from the usual gullible right wing-nuts.

Opinon column are not from the WSJ. They are just that, opinions.

as they are from any other news organization. That's what you still fail to understand. ooops.

 

[berg80]

The Wall Street Journal lays out the reasoning as to why the FBI raid was illegal.

The WSJ is just flat wrong.

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/national-archives-letter-trump-fbi/1a5fa3f08cdb0f7d/full.pdf

The DoJ, even the Biden admin, bent over backwards to cut Don some slack as evidenced by this letter. The letter also provides the legal predicate for the issuance of the search warrant.

 

[Magnus]

as they are from any other news organization. That's what you still fail to understand. ooops.

Yes. Other news organizations also have opinion columns. That was your sole contribution?

 

[jc456]

Yes. Other news organizations also have opinion columns. That was your sole contribution?

for that one post sure. did it need more?

 

[Magnus]

Do you think Biden should be held to the same standards?

Hey, trumptard. You disappeared on me yesterday. Still waiting for your answer to my question:

What kind of punishment do you think that your orange fuhrer should get for not turning in the classified documents?

 

[Magnus]

for that one post sure. did it need more?

Not from you. That one response tired you out, didn't it?

 

[Care4all]

ACTUALLY that is NOT TRUE.

Witnesses have testified / stated Trump declassified everything he supposedly took.

It is on offical record that PRESIDENT Trump gave the FBI Director a legal Presidential Order to declassify and release all files and information regarding tbe FBI's ILLEGAL and arguably treasonous CROSSFIRE HURRICANE operation.

It is on official record, reported by the media, to include the left wing media (which I provided links to in its own thread), that the FBI illegally DISOBEYED that order and going on 20 months now has neither declassified nor released any of that information.

- Furthermore, it is on official record and also reported even by the left wing media that the FBI has illegally refused to comply with the US FOIA Law by refusing to comply with SEVERAL FOIA requests to release the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE information, requests made in conjunction with / after the President's order to declassify and release everything.

RIGHT NOW, this very minute and until they comply with both Presidentia Order and multiple FOIA requests, the US FBI are and continue to violate numerous orders and laws.



Now, what lack of common sense / intelligence would cause snowflakes to knowingly, falsely claim President Trump did not / made no effort to declasdify information when it is on record that he did, when their own left wing media reported that he did, and when their own left wing media has reported the FBI is guilty of non-compliance with both President Trump's LAWFUL ORDER AND FOIA LAW?

Now, what lack of common sense / intelligence would cause snowflakes to knowingly, falsely claim President Trump ordered the declassification of the FBI's CROSSFIRE HURRICANE information but for some illogical reason did not / would NOT declassify all the other information?

It makes 100% no sense whatsoever... but that is what the DOJ, FBI, and FBI Agents - who all broke laws and knowingly willingly participated in the highly illegal and treasonous failed coup attempt who are now responsible for this unprecedented, historic, unwarranted raid on a President's house...who viated the Patriot Act, defrauded the FISA Court, and illegally spied on Americans..are asking us to believe.

It is what snowflakes and proven criminal traitor apologists demand we believe.

Nope! Cash Patel claims it, who is lying.

You can't wave a magic wand to declassify secrets and top secrets....it is ridiculous that you even believe one could. There is a process to declassify, so all of govt is on the same page and they are marked correctly....its done, one document at a time, and the presidents signature to reclassify top secret, and the date the president declassified.

 

[jc456]

Not from you. That one response tired you out, didn't it?

I'm fking exhausted. Demofk ignorance is always a strain on the truth.

 

[Care4all]

The presidential records are stored safely by the National archives, the president has access to them, so do govt investigators if in need...the former president has full ACCESS to them, the former president DOES NOT store them, or hold them in his possession, period.

 

[jc456]

The presidential records are stored safely by the National archives, the president has access to them, so do govt investigators if in need...the former president has full ACCESS to them, the former president DOES NOT store them, or hold them in his possession, period.

yep, that's one thing you got right so far. Obammy's team is digitizing his for the Archives. It's who provides the presidential libraries. But the former preses leave with their documents.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Welp.... Left tards got to tard... Five major news organizations have now called the Mar-a-Lago Raid Illegal. And the tards are apoplectic...

 

[Care4all]

That's so cute....

You read the "news" and believe it. How many bridges do you own?



.

Nope, I read it, then I research it, to fact check!

P.s. I think you are cute too!

 

[jc456]

Nope, I read it, then I research it, to fact check!

P.s. I think you are cute too!

fact checkers lie all the fking time.

 

[Care4all]

Welp.... Left tards got to tard... Five major news organizations have now called the Mar-a-Lago Raid Illegal. And the tards are apoplectic...

What are the 5 newspapers? And how would they even know, without the facts in the affidavit?

And are you sure you are not confusing OPINION articles instead of this being the actual newspaper's stance?