- Nov 18, 2019
- Reaction score
So how did they use it to attack Trump again?That is NOT what we can see.So as we can see, the investigation was never about damaging the Trump campaign.1. Because leaking that an "investigation" is underway would need proof, and as the Mueller Investigation proved, there is no proof of Trump campaign collusion. There is only proof that the DNC and Hillary campaign colluded via the Steele Dossier.If the FBI was out to sabotage Trump's candidacy why didn't they leak the fact that an investigation in to communications between Russian operatives and members of the campaign had been launched during the summer?
2. The fact that the Obama FBI was investigating the Trump campaign would have shone way too much light on the conspiracy.
3. All someone in the FBI would have needed to leak to the press was Operation Crossfire Hurricane and the democrats would have been skewered. Besides, Hillary was unbeatable, she had a 95% probability of winning.
4. What I never understood was Comey blaring that the FBI had the Uma/Weiner laptop with classified emails, WTF??
What we saw is that the FBI started the investigation into "Russian meddling in the 2016 election", called Operation Crossfire Hurricane, legitimately as per the IG. But then the investigation went off the rails into the Trump Campaign, including using CIA assets, the FBI falsifying evidence, illegal surveillance, and all the other goodies that Barr and Durham are supposed to be investigating, including many FISA abuses.
Barr and Durham need to start sending indictments out so the deep state knows they are not running the Federal government.