FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[postman]

Hur’s report stated that his investigation “uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice-presidency when he was a private citizen.”

-----------[the flip side]------------

In Hur’s view, “it would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him—by then a former president well into his eighties—of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

WOW, Hur claimed he could prove willfulness, but couldn't prove it to a jury.

Sounds like somebody claiming he has the fastest car, but won't ever race it.

 

[Delldude]

He said he didn’t. End of story.

Second paragraph and later defined in the report. Posted and proven to you.

Shouldn't you be delivering mail today?

 

[Nostra]

Actually it is actually exculpatory of a crime.
A thief doesn't leave his loot out in the open.

Why do you think Trump wouldn't let anybody see his tax returns?

 

[Nostra]

WOW, Hur claimed he could prove willfulness, but couldn't prove it to a jury.

Sounds like somebody claiming he has the fastest car, but won't ever race it.

….because Tater was a vegetable. Read the whole thing, Simp.

‘Too many words?

 

[Marener]

Second paragraph and later defined in the report. Posted and proven to you.

Shouldn't you be delivering mail today?

You didn’t read the third paragraph where he said the evidence wasn’t enough to prove it.

 

[Delldude]

You didn’t read the third paragraph where he said the evidence wasn’t enough to prove it.

Thank you for admitting Hur did have evidence that Biden did, in fact break the law, multiple times.

 

[Marener]

Thank you for admitting Hur did have evidence that Biden did, in fact break the law, multiple times.

When will you admit there isn’t proof that he broke the law?

 

[AntonToo]

The case was clearly proven. Even after having to jump the hurdles put before it by Judge Aileen Cannon, and her interference that the 11th circuit admonished her for.

On Dec. 1, in a unanimous per curiam decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled to reverse an order issued by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to appoint a special master to oversee the review of classified documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-lago residence on Aug. 8.

The 11th Circuit found that Cannon “improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction” in hearing the case and that the entire proceeding should be dismissed. Notably, the court also found that regardless of the status of a document in question (personal or presidential), the government maintains the authority to seize it under a warrant supported by probable cause.

The panel wrote, “The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so.”

All those stalling convulsions were before Cannon's final act of dissmissing the case under excuse that Special Prosecutor supposedly was TOO independent from DOJ and thus lacked authority.

While appeal of Cannon's another ludicrous ruling was ongoing case was re-filed in Miami-Dale jurisdiction (where it should've been filed in the first place)- but all that came to a halt once Trump won the election.

There is little doubt Trump would get convicted on all counts if jury was ever allowed to render a verdict, but it's not accurate to say that the "case was proven" since they never did.

 

[Delldude]

When will you admit there isn’t proof that he broke the law?

Hur admitted there was evidence. He had doubts he could convince a jury due to the fact that Biden's senile dementia and sweet demeanor would elicit sympathy for him.

 

[postman]

Second paragraph and later defined in the report. Posted and proven to you.

Shouldn't you be delivering mail today?

The first paragraph defined the report.
The second paragraph was just making excuses
Wooda, shooda, coulda......

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Jesus ... you are COMPLETELY OBSESSED!!!!

.

They've got NOTHING but Orange Man Bad!

NOTHING

.

 

[Nostra]

When will you admit there isn’t proof that he broke the law?

Why would he admit to your lies, liar?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Joe Biden vehemently stated in public that...
"We choose truth over facts!"
In this thread the demented LEFT posters here are giving a fantastic exhibition of that very warped mindset.

 

[postman]

….because Tater was a vegetable. Read the whole thing, Simp.

‘Too many words?

If Biden was a vegetable, then Hur knows he could never establish Mens Rea, which means he can't prove INTENT. And without intent, there is no crime.

He shot himself in the foot, by attacking Biden's mental competence. Which was just a political move to smear Trump's likely opponent.

 

[postman]

Thank you for admitting Hur did have evidence that Biden did, in fact break the law, multiple times.

You always have evidence. The question is do you have ENOUGH evidence to prove it to a jury BEYOND A RESONABLE DOUBT.

If you can't do that, then you're just blowing smoke.

 

[Marener]

Hur admitted there was evidence. He had doubts he could convince a jury due to the fact that Biden's senile dementia and sweet demeanor would elicit sympathy for him.

He couldn’t convince a jury because he didn’t have proof.

End of story.

 

[Delldude]

The first paragraph defined the report.
The second paragraph was just making excuses
Wooda, shooda, coulda......

LOL TM

You stick with that.

The Marener always rings twice

 

[postman]

Thank you for admitting Hur did have evidence that Biden did, in fact break the law, multiple times.

Except this law has multiple requirements. If any one of those elements can't be proved, then that law wasn't broken.

It's like the degrees of murder. First, Second, Third. They all have a dead body, but you have to prove different circumstances, and intent for each to be charged. With first having more necessary elements than second. And second having more necessary elements than third.
After that it devolves into manslaughter.

The classified documents law has no degrees. There is no backup lower charge to fall back on, only higher charges.

 

[postman]

He couldn’t convince a jury because he didn’t have proof.

End of story.

They seem to forget what the standard of "proof" is.

And they think you still have proof, even though you can't prove it to a jury.

That's why they have grand juries, and require indictments. If you can't convince a grand jury, you aren't going to convince a trial jury.

And Hur said in a dozen different ways, that he couldn't convince a jury that a crime was committed.

 

[Marener]

Whether or not it was or wasn't enough, it's still evidence. You two claim there was no evidence.

It must be a pain in the ass posting two accounts at a time, eh?

I never claimed there was no evidence. I claimed there was no proof.

Unlike Trump, where there was ample proof of his criminal actions.