FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

Whether or not it was or wasn't enough, it's still evidence. You two claim there was no evidence.
No I said there wasn't enough evidence to prove all necessary elements of the crime.

Without every element provable, there is no crime.
 
And Hur said in a dozen different ways, that he couldn't convince a jury that a crime was committed.
And he showed in a dozen different ways he had evidence Biden broke the law.
I never claimed there was no evidence. I claimed there was no proof.
Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.

End of story.
 
And he showed in a dozen different ways he had evidence Biden broke the law.

Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.

End of story.
No proof. No indictment. End of story.
 
And he showed in a dozen different ways he had evidence Biden broke the law.

Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.

End of story.
Hur said he couldn't prove it to a jury.
That means it can't be legally proven.
 
Never was headed to a GJ in the first place. Hur even said why, even after proving Biden broke the law many times.

End of story.
Hur said there was no proof, so there was no reason to take it to a grand jury.

When will you admit that there’s no proof?
 
Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.

End of story.
Actually Hur didn't even try to "prove" any of what he claimed, by putting it in front of a jury.

He coulda been a contender, if he ever stepped into the ring.
 
Never was headed to a GJ in the first place. Hur even said why, even after proving Biden broke the law many times.

End of story.

Wait? Hur didn't even have enough evidence to present it to a grand jury?
 
Hur said there was no proof, so there was no reason to take it to a grand jury.

When will you admit that there’s no proof?

This is like their argument that there is proof that Biden stole the 2020 election.
But they can't prove it in a court of law.

But...but...but... they still have proof.
 
Look way beyond. It's been posted previously

You lost.

End of story.
Hur said there’s no proof. Biden wasn’t indicted.

I don’t know what you’re blabbering about.
 
15th post
LOL TM

You can't indict a sitting president............:asshole:
Biden’s not a sitting president and still isn’t indicted.

Hur said he wouldn’t have tried to indict Biden even if he weren’t president because he couldn’t prove he committed a crime.
 
Biden’s not a sitting president and still isn’t indicted.
He was during the Hur investigation......LOL

He can execute prosecutorial discretion on any case, even with the overwhelming evidence that Biden did break the law and he did.
 
He was during the Hur investigation......LOL

He can execute prosecutorial discretion on any case, even with the overwhelming evidence that Biden did break the law and he did.
You cut off the rest of my comment because you’re pathetic and ignore anything that contradicts your lies.

Hur said he wouldn’t have indicted Biden even if he wasn’t president because he didn’t have proof.

Looks like Hur was right because Biden isn’t president and hasn’t been indicted.
 
He was during the Hur investigation......LOL

He can execute prosecutorial discretion on any case, even with the overwhelming evidence that Biden did break the law and he did.
Then Hur would have made the recommendation that Biden be prosecuted upon leaving office.
But instead Hur said

We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter.

We would reach the same conclusion even if Department of Justice policy did not foreclose
criminal charges against a sitting president.
 
Back
Top Bottom