Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,965
- 25,569
- 2,173
Why would he admit to your lies, liar?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would he admit to your lies, liar?

No I said there wasn't enough evidence to prove all necessary elements of the crime.Whether or not it was or wasn't enough, it's still evidence. You two claim there was no evidence.
And he showed in a dozen different ways he had evidence Biden broke the law.And Hur said in a dozen different ways, that he couldn't convince a jury that a crime was committed.
Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.I never claimed there was no evidence. I claimed there was no proof.
Biden got a free pass.No I said there wasn't enough evidence to prove all necessary elements of the crime.
Without every element provable, there is no crime.
No proof. No indictment. End of story.And he showed in a dozen different ways he had evidence Biden broke the law.
Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.
End of story.
Never was headed to a GJ in the first place. Hur even said why, even after proving Biden broke the law many times.No proof. No indictment. End of story.
Hur said he couldn't prove it to a jury.And he showed in a dozen different ways he had evidence Biden broke the law.
Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.
End of story.
Hur said there was no proof, so there was no reason to take it to a grand jury.Never was headed to a GJ in the first place. Hur even said why, even after proving Biden broke the law many times.
End of story.
Actually Hur didn't even try to "prove" any of what he claimed, by putting it in front of a jury.Funny, Hur proved it several times. We played this game before, your were proven wrong.
End of story.
Never was headed to a GJ in the first place. Hur even said why, even after proving Biden broke the law many times.
End of story.
Look way beyond. It's been posted previouslyParagraph 3 is where Hur says there’s no proof.
Hur said there was no proof, so there was no reason to take it to a grand jury.
When will you admit that there’s no proof?
He couldn't.Wait? Hur didn't even have enough evidence to present it to a grand jury?
If he had PROOF, he certainly could.He couldn't.
Hur said there’s no proof. Biden wasn’t indicted.Look way beyond. It's been posted previously
You lost.
End of story.
If he had PROOF, he certainly could.
If he didn't have PROOF, then he couldn't.
That's proof, there was no proof.

Biden’s not a sitting president and still isn’t indicted.LOL TM
You can't indict a sitting president............![]()
He was during the Hur investigation......LOLBiden’s not a sitting president and still isn’t indicted.
You cut off the rest of my comment because you’re pathetic and ignore anything that contradicts your lies.He was during the Hur investigation......LOL
He can execute prosecutorial discretion on any case, even with the overwhelming evidence that Biden did break the law and he did.
Then Hur would have made the recommendation that Biden be prosecuted upon leaving office.He was during the Hur investigation......LOL
He can execute prosecutorial discretion on any case, even with the overwhelming evidence that Biden did break the law and he did.