FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[ThisIsMe]

Hur actually refuted that he could prove Biden knew he had what he had.
By describing Biden as having a poor memory, he provided exculpatory evidence against the crime.

No he didn’t lol, he said that they couldn’t get a jury to convict based on those things. The evidence he provided was proof that Biden acted willful to retain. Even stating that Biden had “strong motivation” to keep this material.

Just because Biden was deemed to have a poor memory NOW doesn’t mean he had a poor memory THEN. But a jury wouldn’t see it like that.

 

[ThisIsMe]

He said he didn’t. End of story.

Quote that please.

 

[Marener]

Quote that please.

Already did. Evidence couldn’t prove the case. End of story.

 

[TimFitz]

Already did. Evidence couldn’t prove the case. End of story.

The case was open and shut.

And there was no shortage of evidence.

The only prayer Trump ever had was to delay the trial long enough to get past the election.

Once he won. He used the get out of jail free card the Supreme Court,

 

[postman]

The case was open and shut.

And there was no shortage of evidence.

The only prayer Trump ever had was to delay the trial long enough to get past the election.

Once he won. He used the get out of jail free card the Supreme Court,

The sentencing judge even put Trump predicting his victory in 2024 in his sentencing memo.
Congratulating him on his foreseeing his victory, and due to that, limiting the legal sentences that could be imposed on him.

 

[Rawley]

Biden only ran against Trump once.
And Biden kicked Trump's ass in that election.

1,000% Ratty Kudos

 

[TimFitz]

The sentencing judge even put Trump predicting his victory in 2024 in his sentencing memo.
Congratulating him on his foreseeing his victory, and due to that, limiting the legal sentences that could be imposed on him.

There was no sentencing memo, because there was neither a conviction or a trial.

 

[postman]

There was no sentencing memo, because there was neither a conviction or a trial.

Did you miss Trump's 34 felony convictions?

 

[postman]

BTW: The USSC will either take it's time, or not even bother to hear Trump's appeal of his 34 felony convictions.
Remember the old axiom, no harm, no foul.

 

[postman]

Already did. Evidence couldn’t prove the case. End of story.

The case was clearly proven. Even after having to jump the hurdles put before it by Judge Aileen Cannon, and her interference that the 11th circuit admonished her for.

On Dec. 1, in a unanimous per curiam decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled to reverse an order issued by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to appoint a special master to oversee the review of classified documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-lago residence on Aug. 8.

The 11th Circuit found that Cannon “improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction” in hearing the case and that the entire proceeding should be dismissed. Notably, the court also found that regardless of the status of a document in question (personal or presidential), the government maintains the authority to seize it under a warrant supported by probable cause.

The panel wrote, “The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so.”

 

[Nostra]

He was clear that there wasn't enough evidence to charge Biden. He said it in the first parapgraph of the report.

The rest of the report only exists to support that conclusion.

You might want to bookmark this, you keep forgetting.

He didn’t charge Tater cuz he was a vegetable, Short Bus.

 

[Nostra]

Liar.

But you can redeem yourself by showing us a single charge in the Trump indictment of which Biden is guilty.

Nah, you'll just lie again.

Biden stole, and WILLFULLY RETAINED, top secret documents in his open garage.

You don’t think that is a crime?

 

[Nostra]

That’s dumb. He procured them lawfully because he was vice president who needed these documents.

Prove it Marener

 

[Marener]

Prove it Marener

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

 

[Nostra]

There is NOTHING in Hur's report about any dementia or inability to stand trial.

Elderly person with faulty memory is not same as a dementia diagnosis you ignorant fool.

Hur’s report stated that his investigation “uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice-presidency when he was a private citizen.” He reasoned that “at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” In Hur’s view, “it would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him—by then a former president well into his eighties—of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

 

[Nostra]

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

Fail.

Not even close, Short Bus.

Nothing in that even mentions your lie.

 

[Marener]

Fail.

Not even close, Short Bus.

Nothing in that even mentions your lie.

 

[postman]

He didn’t charge Tater cuz he was a vegetable, Short Bus.

You can indict a ham sandwich.

 

[postman]

Biden stole, and WILLFULLY RETAINED, top secret documents in his open garage.

You don’t think that is a crime?

Actually it is actually exculpatory of a crime.
A thief doesn't leave his loot out in the open.

Why do you think Trump wouldn't let anybody see his tax returns?

 

[postman]

That’s dumb. He procured them lawfully because he was vice president who needed these documents.

Prove it Marener

Joe Biden was elected Vice President in November 2008 as the running mate of presidential candidate Barack Obama. They were re-elected for a second term in November 2012.