FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[MarathonMike]

View attachment 1195300

I don't remember that video. Was that when Obama learned that his Fast and Furious gun-running program got Border Patrol agent Brian Terry murdered?

 

[Lockback]

I don't remember that video. Was that when Obama learned that his Fast and Furious gun-running program got Border Patrol agent Brian Terry murdered?

No.
He never would have choked up about a Border Patrol agent being killed.

 

[Marener]

Really bad optics for you. Makes you look like a third world criminal. Pretty sure turning the US into a third world shit hole country is your intent .how does that feel to be called out like this?

Trump is the criminal. Why didn’t you read the article you linked?

It annihilates your argument. Makes you look like a ******* moron.

 

[Marener]

Trump was never on trial for that. Factualy he is innocent.

Hypocrite.

 

[MarathonMike]

No.
He never would have choked up about a Border Patrol agent being killed.

Obama showing compassion for murdered law enforcement, what was I thinking?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Trump is the criminal. Why didn’t you read the article you linked?

It annihilates your argument. Makes you look like a ******* moron.

I read it fool. Canon thinks that the FBI didn't have probable cause to invade mar-a-largo. I agree, you don't. You think it's okay for political enemies in the United States to use any means necessary to win. You sound like a ******* third world shitface. Corrupt and dishonest. How does that feel? This is what she said
"
What was unthinkable with respect to President Clinton's recordings, and deemed unwarranted with respect to Hillary Clinton's destruction of evidence, was determined to be appropriate by the Biden Administration for President Biden's chief political rival,"

you are not thinking clearly. You are part of the problem not the solution.. overlooking lawlessness is not a good way to go, makes you look bad


He identifies four omissions in the warrant, but none of the omitted information—even if added to the affidavit in support of the warrant—would have defeated a finding of probable cause," Cannon wrote straightforwardly, adding a footnote for extra clarity: "The Motion does not meaningfully challenge the presence of probable cause in the affidavit."

Cannon didn't stop here.

She found that the allegedly relevant omitted details about "dissenting views of other FBI agents" — and D'Antuono's support for contacting Trump's attorney, seeking consent to search Mar-a-Lago — were an "insufficient basis to believe" that the "evidentiary calculus in support of probable cause" would have been "altered" by the information's inclusion in the application.

The "omissions" couldn't defeat probable cause, but they were good enough for another news cycle.

You need to try to think past your TDS

 

[Nostra]

As VP, like the President, they can look at Top Secret documentation in their office. They are provided with secure storage for such documents.

Once again you demonstrate your ignorance.



AI Overview



Yes, Senators (and their staff) generally
must be in a Secure Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) to access highly classified information, especially Top Secret/SCI (TS/SCI). SCIFs are highly secure rooms designed to prevent unauthorized access, requiring specific clearance, logs, and strict protocols (no electronics, notes) to review sensitive data like national security intelligence, ensuring only authorized personnel with a "need-to-know" can see it.
Why SCIFs are Necessary

• Heightened Security: SCIFs are built to protect extremely sensitive national security information, preventing leaks.
• Access Control: Only individuals with the necessary clearances (like TS/SCI) and a valid reason (need-to-know) can enter.
• Strict Procedures: Visitors must sign in/out, have an escort, and leave all personal devices and materials outside.

 

[Nostra]

They keep leaving out the part where it requires "intent to retain".

Neither Biden nor Pence tried to hold onto their classified materials. They were turned over, as soon as they were discovered.
,

Intent to retain doesn’t mean turning them over when busted, stupid.

Tater had some for decades. How did he do that if he didn’t intend to retain them, moron.

 

[Nostra]

He could have been Stephen Hawking. They had absolutely no proof that Biden (or Pence) intended to retain the documents.

Other than them retaining them for years.

 

[Nostra]

Actually William Barr said it best.
That if it was true that Trump declassified the contents of those boxes, that would be worse than possession of the classified materials.

In fact, I believe Trump doing so, would be a clearly impeachable act, if not actual treason. Giving aid and comfort to our enemies.

Akin to Benedict Arnold planning to surrender West Point.

You are a lunatic.

 

[Nostra]

The documents were hidden inside the boxes.

Did he tell them they couldn’t look inside them?

 

[Nostra]

Then prove I’m lying asshole.

Been there, done that. You do nothing but lie, so now I just mock you.

And it’s on you to prove your claims, I quit asking that a long time ago too, cuz you never can.

 

[Nostra]

What’s illegal about getting a search warrant?

You deeming okay? You aren’t making any sense.

Depends on how you get it. Like when Comey and his gang kept lying to the FISA court claiming the fake dossier had been proven as fact.

 

[Marener]

You need to try to think past your TDS

You should have read the article. Cannon said the warrant was valid and rejected Trump’s attempt to challenge probable case.

 

[postman]

They have to because WH OLC will be defending their opinion before SCOTUS if challenged.

LOL TM

Defending their OPINION. Which the SC is in no way bound to.

The SC can come up with a completely different OPINION. Often using Amicus arguments in their opinions.

 

[postman]

Biden SHOULD HAVE been charged, for willfully retaining classified materials.

Biden should have been charged that way.
That way the grand jury would have never indicted him, because there was no "intent" to retain.

 

[postman]

Intent was already proven when Hur said Biden acted willfully.

You keep leaving out "with INTENT to retain"

If you have three necessary elements to a charge, you have to have ALL THREE, not just one or two.

 

[postman]

Trump was never on trial for that. Factualy he is innocent.

Under that logic, the guy who shot Donald Trump in Pennsylvania was also innocent.

 

[postman]

Obama showing compassion for murdered law enforcement, what was I thinking?

Well you should ask, why did Trump pardon the people who seriously injured law enforcement officers.

And pardon the guy who helped bring 400 TONS of illegal drugs into the US, killing untold thousands of Americans.

 

[postman]

I read it fool. Canon thinks that the FBI didn't have probable cause to invade mar-a-largo.

You didn't read your own citation. Cannon said they did have probable cause to invade mar-a-lago.

Your citation:

He identifies four omissions in the warrant, but none of the omitted information—even if added to the affidavit in support of the warrant—would have defeated a finding of probable cause," Cannon wrote straightforwardly, adding a footnote for extra clarity: "The Motion does not meaningfully challenge the presence of probable cause in the affidavit."

Cannon didn't stop here.

She found that the allegedly relevant omitted details about "dissenting views of other FBI agents" — and D'Antuono's support for contacting Trump's attorney, seeking consent to search Mar-a-Lago — were an "insufficient basis to believe" that the "evidentiary calculus in support of probable cause" would have been "altered" by the information's inclusion in the application.

End citation.