FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[postman]

Once again you demonstrate your ignorance.



AI Overview



Yes, Senators (and their staff) generally
must be in a Secure Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) to access highly classified information, especially Top Secret/SCI (TS/SCI). SCIFs are highly secure rooms designed to prevent unauthorized access, requiring specific clearance, logs, and strict protocols (no electronics, notes) to review sensitive data like national security intelligence, ensuring only authorized personnel with a "need-to-know" can see it.
Why SCIFs are Necessary

• Heightened Security: SCIFs are built to protect extremely sensitive national security information, preventing leaks.
• Access Control: Only individuals with the necessary clearances (like TS/SCI) and a valid reason (need-to-know) can enter.
• Strict Procedures: Visitors must sign in/out, have an escort, and leave all personal devices and materials outside.

Read what you posted again.

That's for Top Secret (SCI)

Biden didn't have Top Secret (SCI) documents.,

 

[postman]

Intent to retain doesn’t mean turning them over when busted, stupid.

Tater had some for decades. How did he do that if he didn’t intend to retain them, moron.

You're right about turning them over doesn't mean "intent to retain"

It means having NO intent to retain.

For that you need an overt act. Which neither Biden nor Pence carried out.

 

[postman]

Other than them retaining them for years.

They may have had them on their property, but they were in such locations, that retention wasn't applicable. Had they had them on their persons, or where they would have open access to them would show intent. But the documents they found were most likely packed up in boxes by someone else.

So technically the person who packed the boxes is the one subject to prosecution.

 

[Delldude]

Defending their OPINION. Which the SC is in no way bound to.

The SC can come up with a completely different OPINION. Often using Amicus arguments in their opinions.

Whoopee ding. Two parties argue before SCOTUS, a decision is given. Both parties live with the decision.

That's how it works.

 

[Delldude]

They may have had them on their property, but they were in such locations, that retention wasn't applicable

Except for the ones conveniently located in the Secure Corvette Information Facility where Hunter just happened to live and was at the same time some of his finest work in getting ten percent for the Big Guy was happening.

 

[postman]

Except for the ones conveniently located in the Secure Corvette Information Facility where Hunter just happened to live and was at the same time some of his finest work in getting ten percent for the Big Guy was happening.

Actually that's a good example of NOT having retention of them.

 

[Delldude]

Actually that's a good example of NOT having retention of them.

Biden admitted keeping them.

 

[postman]

Except for the ones conveniently located in the Secure Corvette Information Facility where Hunter just happened to live ...

As the TSA would say:

"Did you pack your bags yourself?"

"Have your bags have been in your control the entire time since you packed them?"

Biden's answer for the box where classified documents were found

No and No !

With those answers, the TSA knows they can't prosecute that person for any contraband in his luggage.

 

[postman]

Biden admitted keeping them.

No, Biden admitted HAVING THEM. There was no overt act to keep them

And then immediately gave them to the National Archives as per the PRA.

 

[Delldude]

With those answers, the TSA knows they can't prosecute that person for any contraband in his luggage.

That's bullshit.

No, Biden admitted HAVING THEM. There was no overt act to keep them

It was found that he knowingly and willingly possessed them, but, luckily for him, he only had 49 cards in his deck

 

[postman]

It was found that he knowingly and willingly possessed them, but, luckily for him, he only had 49 cards in his deck

What WASN'T found, was the intent to retain them
A key element in the crime they sought to charge him with.

Without INTENT there is no crime.

How many times, and by how many different people do you have to be told that?

 

[Delldude]

What WASN'T found, was the intent to retain them
A key element in the crime they sought to charge him with.

Not really. Hur decided not to pursue it.

Makes it look like DOJ was doing something while they chased Trump.

Get out of jail free card.

 

[postman]

Not really. Hur decided not to pursue it.

Looks like DOJ was doing something while they chased Trump.

Get out of jail free card.

Because Hur knew he couldn't prove intent to retain

The "sympathetic jury figure" was just his way of speaking to the 400 lb gorilla in the room.

 

[Delldude]

Because Hur knew he couldn't prove intent to retain

He never went down that road.

 

[postman]

He never went down that road.

Hur had to investigate that element of the crime, in order to even think about bringing charges, and presenting to a grand jury.

 

[postman]

The Special Counsel Robert Hur report details the physical locations and manner in which classified documents were found, which are key elements in establishing their "chain of custody" outside of official government channels.

The report describes a lack of a formal, secure chain of custody once the documents left secure government facilities, noting they were found in various unsecure locations:

Biden's Wilmington, Delaware garage:

Classified documents related to Afghanistan military and foreign policy were found in a "damaged, opened box" surrounded by "household detritus," including a collapsed dog crate, a dog bed, and a broken lamp.

Biden's Virginia home:

Investigators believe President Biden possessed classified documents in his Virginia home in 2017 after leaving the Vice Presidency.

Penn Biden Center:

An initial batch of classified documents was discovered in an office at the Penn Biden Center, a think tank in Washington, D.C..

The report notes that Biden's personal attorneys and White House counsel cooperated with the investigation by reporting the discovery of the documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, in contrast to the alleged obstruction in the Trump case.

Ultimately, the report concluded that while Biden "willfully retained and disclosed classified materials," no criminal charges were warranted because the evidence did not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

 

[Nostra]

Biden should have been charged that way.
That way the grand jury would have never indicted him, because there was no "intent" to retain.

^Mind reader^

Tell us how Tater didn’t intend to keep docs he stole in his garage for decades.

 

[Nostra]

Read what you posted again.

That's for Top Secret (SCI)

Biden didn't have Top Secret (SCI) documents.,

Learn to read, stupid.

Do you know what :especially” means? It’s a bug word so ask if you need help.

 

[Nostra]

Read what you posted again.

That's for Top Secret (SCI)

Biden didn't have Top Secret (SCI) documents.,

Why do you think you can lie in every post and get away with it, liar?



On November 2, 2022, Joe Biden's personal attorneys found classified documents dating to his vice presidency, some of which were top secret sensitive compartmented information,<a href="Joe Biden classified documents incident - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>7<span>]</span></a>

 

[Nostra]

You're right about turning them over doesn't mean "intent to retain"

It means having NO intent to retain.

For that you need an overt act. Which neither Biden nor Pence carried out.

No stupid, keeping stolen TOP SECRET DOCUMENTS in your open garage for years proves INTENT TO RETAIN

Simply saying “Oops! Here ya go, take them back” when busted in no way proves he didn’t I tend to keep them.

Hole smokes you are dumb.