FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[Care4all]

Lies.

The gov visited MAL that spring, reviewed what he had, and then just asked him to provide an additional lock on where they were kept, which he did.

You are leaving out MORE THAN HALF the story....conveniently!!!

 

[Delldude]

The ones he was legally allowed to have at home, since he was the sitting president.

Stole them when he wasn't president...............

The opinion itself carries no legal weight.

It appears it does at the moment. Wanna try again?

 

[postman]

Stole them when he wasn't president...............

It appears it does at the moment. Wanna try again?

Actually NO.

The SC doesn't ask what the WH OLC said about it.
Their opinion is thrown in with all the other Amicus Briefs.

 

[postman]

Remember when the SC put limits on the EPA, because they said that in the EPA law, congress didn't specifically give them full riparian oversight.

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency

The Clean Water Act extends only to wetlands that have a continuous surface connection with “waters” of the United States—i.e., with a relatively permanent body of water connected to traditional interstate navigable waters.

 

[Delldude]

Actually NO.

Actually YES.

The SC doesn't ask what the WH OLC said about it.

They have to because WH OLC will be defending their opinion before SCOTUS if challenged.

LOL TM

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You admit the government was illegal?

What a bizarre question. Slow down, you're rabid.

Do you mean the actions in New Orleans? I dont know, were they illegal? You brought them up. You tell us.

Make your own big boy point in your own big boy words. Stop begging others for assistance.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Stole them when he wasn't president.

Yes, that's one thing you would have a problem proving. We covered that.

Go repeat your failed talking points to someone else. I already covered all 2 of them.

 

[Delldude]

Do you mean the actions in New Orleans? I dont know, were they illegal?

NOLA has no 2nd amendment then, I guess.

Yes, that's one thing you would have a problem proving.

Didn't address that..........except 'knowingly and willingly'

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

NOLA has no 2nd amendment then, I guess.


Didn't address that..........except 'knowingly and willingly'

Oops, you forgot to make your own big boy point.

Being the nice guy I am, I will let you try again.

And yes, troll, that has been addressed directly to you multiple times.

 

[Dragonlady]

If that was said about Biden or Obama, you would walk back every claim you made.

It’s not being said about Obama or Biden and it never would be said of them because they actually ran the country in a decent and respectful manner.

What you never supply, on this thread, is proof.

I’ve posted dozens of links. The problem is you never read them.

How the anti-Trump dossier came to be

The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative site based in Washington, D.C., confirmed that it hired the firm Fusion GPS to unearth damaging information about President Donald Trump in the run-up to the election. GOP donor and billionaire Paul Singer is one of the site’s key backers. Associated...

www.pbs.org

Or you dismiss it as “fake news”.

Moron.

 

[Dragonlady]

Lies.

Then prove I’m lying asshole.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You're not following.

The charge in Trumps indictment of which Biden is also guilty does not exist.

So your proclamation that, if Trump broke the law, so did Biden, was wrong and baseless.

But you go ahead and show us the charge in Trump's indictment of which Biden is also guilty.

See you in never, because it isn't there.

No, you’re the one that isn’t following. As I said in my post, that you cut off, I realize there is no charge for Biden, but then I wrote a whole post explaining what I meant, that you cut off.

Biden SHOULD HAVE been charged, for willfully retaining classified materials.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Which was unnecessary pandering to his masters, given he concluded there wasn't enough evidence to convict him anyway.

Nooo, he never said that lol. He explicitly stated that Biden DID retain and disclose classified information. They said it was insufficient because they didn’t think they could get a jury to convict, based on the fact that Biden had a poor memory, or they said “he forgot”. Basically, he gave Biden a pass.

 

[ThisIsMe]

That's just a lame excuse instead of giving the real reason that they couldn't prove intent.
Biden is a public figure, the jury can ignore the presentation, and go with their prior knowledge.

Unlike this guy:

Vincent 'The Chin' Gigante, 77; Mob Chief Faked Mental Illness in Bid to Avoid Prison

Vincent "The Chin" Gigante, the powerful New York mob boss who avoided prison for decades by wandering Greenwich Village's streets in a ratty bathrobe and slippers as part of an elaborate feigned mental illness, died Monday in prison, federal officials said.

www.latimes.com

Vincent ‘The Chin’ Gigante, 77; Mob Chief Faked Mental Illness in Bid to Avoid Prison

Vincent “The Chin” Gigante, the powerful New York mob boss who avoided prison for decades by wandering Greenwich Village’s streets in a ratty bathrobe and slippers as part of an elaborate feigned mental illness

Dubbed “The Oddfather” for his bizarre behavior, the former Genovese crime family head, an ex-boxer whose lengthy string of victories over prosecutors ended with a July 1997 racketeering conviction, finally admitted his insanity ruse at an April 2003 hearing.

Gigante died at the U.S. Medical Center for federal prisoners in Springfield, Mo.,

Intent was already proven when Hur said Biden acted willfully.

I’m still curious how NARA let him go 30 years without asking for the documents back, but they were beating down trumps door a few weeks after he left the White House.

As is being discovered, possible that Biden administration was behind it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, you’re the one that isn’t following. As I said in my post, that you cut off, I realize there is no charge for Biden, but then I wrote a whole post explaining what I meant, that you cut off.

Biden SHOULD HAVE been charged, for willfully retaining classified materials.

Still not following.

You said that, if what Trump did was illegal, then so is what Biden did.

Which, naturally, you invented on the spot just to keep talking and to keep getting responses.

So I invited you to put your money where your prolific mouth is and show us a single charge in the Trump indictment of which Biden is also guilty.

And we have been treated to this low rent tap dancing ever since.

I think we can now safely say you were talking out of your ass.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nooo, he never said that lol

Liar.

He explicitly said it, on page one of the report.

But you never read the report, despite sealioning and trolling about it endlessly.

 

[Robert W]

It’s not being said about Obama or Biden and it never would be said of them because they actually ran the country in a decent and respectful manner.

I’ve posted dozens of links. The problem is you never read them.

How the anti-Trump dossier came to be

The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative site based in Washington, D.C., confirmed that it hired the firm Fusion GPS to unearth damaging information about President Donald Trump in the run-up to the election. GOP donor and billionaire Paul Singer is one of the site’s key backers. Associated...

www.pbs.org

Or you dismiss it as “fake news”.

Moron.

You are not on my ignore list. YET You claim I don't read you.
how do you justify saying that?

I can post links. Will you believe them as well?

 

[Robert W]

So I invited you to put your money where your prolific mouth is and show us a single charge in the Trump indictment of which Biden is also guilty.

Trump is not guilty. Wait, prove the charges were not dropped.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump is not guilty.

Yes, we are all aware of what the cult thinks.

And why they think it.

 

[Robert W]

Yes, we are all aware of what the cult thinks.

And why they think it.

The Obama kult is way more widespread. Bet you love him.