FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Bullshit.

He was just a low level rubber stamp.

No, you made that up.

 

[BackAgain]

No, you made that up.

No. You’re denying reality. Again.

DOJ got a “referral” from the National Archives. The Presidential records act was never a criminal statute. And any delay over the submission of such “records” by a President or former President to the National Archives pending negotiations isn’t a criminal matter, either.

And a President who has chosen to declassify records isn’t in illegal possession of “classified” records in any event.

There never was any crime for the DOJ and FBI to even “investigate.”

No judge should have approved that warrant.

 

[Delldude]

They had absolutely no proof that Biden (or Pence) intended to retain the documents.

That's not what 'willfully and knowingly' means.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No. You’re denying reality. Again.

Calling your made up lie "reality" isnt going to help you. Nor could you ever provide support for your lie.

 

[Robert W]

Your judgement is shot, you have problem understanding very simple things.

I've simply said that you shouldn't uncritically consume partisan garbage coming from rightwing mills and all you can respond with is something about me supposedly telling you to consume from leftwing mills.

That's not a rational response.

Anton, when you pick fights, fight a left winger.

 

[BackAgain]

Calling your made up lie "reality" isnt going to help you. Nor could you ever provide support for your lie.

I spoke the truth. So, naturally, you have no hope of recognizing it.

And I have long since supported what I said.

You don’t recognize facts and logic any more than you recognize truth.

Face it: you’re just a blindly partisan hack ***** troll.

It’s ok. We all know that already.

 

[Robert W]

And there is the fact that he gave them up immediately, when asked. Good luck convincing a jury he had criminal intent to retain them and hide them, when he cooperated and gave them up immediately.

Trumps documents were returned to him. Biden's were confiscated and never returned.

 

[AntonToo]

Anton, when you pick fights, fight a left winger.

I really don't know what the hell you are talking about.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I spoke the truth.

No, you made up a lie to square your cultism in your own head, and you couldn't support it if your life depended on it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trumps documents were returned to him. Biden's were confiscated and never returned.

Well there is the dumbest post of the thread.

 

[postman]

Actually, a refund probably won't happen even if overturned, because the question hasn't been asked before on these specific laws.

There is no existing case law to demand a refund, as the government was acting via its interpretation of the law.

Qualified Immunity would apply in this case.

Actually there is plenty of case law on the underlying issues. That when law, regulation, etc. that is ruled to be unconstitutional, not only carries no legal weight, but is to be treated as if it never existed.

Remember the slaughterhouse cases from after the Civil War. Where all non-ministerial government acts by the unconstitutional governments of those states that were part of the CSA, were ruled to have no legal weight, and treated as if they never existed.

 

[BackAgain]

No, you made up a lie to square your cultism in your own head, and you couldn't support it if your life depended on it.

Wrong again, Farty. I didn’t lie at all. Lying is a you thing. Stop projecting

And I have already supported the truth I posted. Your problem is that you can’t validly refute anything I’ve said.

You have my permission to go **** yourself and to try to square your imbecile-opinions with actual facts and logic.

 

[martybegan]

Actually there is plenty of case law on the underlying issues. That why law, regulation, etc. that is ruled to be unconstitutional, not only carries no legal weight, but is to be treated as if it never existed.

Remember the slaughterhouse cases from after the Civil War. Where all non-ministerial government acts by the unconstitutional governments of those states that were part of the CSA, were ruled to have no legal weight, and treated as if they never existed.

There has been no definitive SC ruling on the tariff laws being applied by the Trump administration.

 

[postman]

Actually, a refund will be mandatory, if overturned.

Not just mandatory, but failure to refund could be prosecuted as larceny.
As the government is not allowed to demand money from people without supporting legal authority.

 

[Robert W]

Well there is the dumbest post of the thread.

 

[postman]

Name the Judge!

I named the judge yesterday.

You're late to the "citation" game.

 

[Robert W]

No, you made up a lie to square your cultism in your own head, and you couldn't support it if your life depended on it.

The dumbest post on the thread.

 

[Robert W]

I've simply said that you shouldn't uncritically consume partisan garbage coming from rightwing mills

Name the mills?

 

[postman]

There has been no definitive SC ruling on the tariff laws being applied by the Trump administration.

There have been hundreds of ruling on laws.
And as such are as applicable to any law or act.
If it's unconstitutional it's unconstitutional retroactive to it's very start, and made null as if it never existed.

 

[Delldude]

Reinhart. (Spelling optional).

Same person that defended serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein?

You know what they say, any association with Epstein is toxic.