FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[Delldude]

In the very first paragraph of the very first page, the report states there was not enough evidence to convict.

Also where 'willfully and knowing' lives...........

It's above the 'however'.

You mean like Trump and his 34 felonies?

Get of of jail free card.

 

[martybegan]

That the US Court of Appeals said were legitimate.

Link?

 

[postman]

Not the same. Any documents created under the President are created by said President, as the elected executive.

The VP has ZERO executive powers while VP.

Actually George W. Bush by executive order granted classification and declassification powers equal to the president to the Vice President. (Dick Cheney)

 

[martybegan]

Fact like tariffs are a tax on Americans.

Actually they are applied to foreign imports, and it depends on the importer to eat part of the tariff, resolve it through changes in efficiencies, or pass it on to the buyer.

 

[postman]

'Willfully and knowingly'

"However, he was a nice old man who wasn't playing with a full deck'.

He could have been Stephen Hawking. They had absolutely no proof that Biden (or Pence) intended to retain the documents.

 

[postman]

Funny, it's still in the appeal process.

Until then, the 34 felonies were ruled legitimate by the highest court to hear the case.

 

[postman]

Link?

You Google.

You know Trump appealed it to the USSC, meaning the lower court ruled against Trump.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Also where 'willfully and knowing' lives.

Right, where he said there was no evidence to convict. We covered that.

I don't think this is getting through.

Oh well, I'm sure someone else will give you attention, while you repeat your 2 failed talking points endlessly.

 

[postman]

Actually they are applied to foreign imports, and it depends on the importer to eat part of the tariff, resolve it through changes in efficiencies, or pass it on to the buyer.

The importer is An American

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually they are applied to foreign imports, and it depends on the importer to eat part of the tariff, resolve it through changes in efficiencies, or pass it on to the buyer.

Or get it refunded, when the SCOTUS strikes down most of Trump's tariffs.

 

[martybegan]

You Google.

You know Trump appealed it to the USSC, meaning the lower court ruled against Trump.

And you have to provide which determination you are actually talking about.

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/trump-34-felony-conviction-appeal-status-cfb289

 

[martybegan]

Or get it refunded, when the SCOTUS strikes down most of Trump's tariffs.

Actually, a refund probably won't happen even if overturned, because the question hasn't been asked before on these specific laws.

There is no existing case law to demand a refund, as the government was acting via its interpretation of the law.

Qualified Immunity would apply in this case.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually, a refund probably won't happen even if overturned, because the question hasn't been asked before on these specific laws.

Actually, a refund will be mandatory, if overturned.

 

[BackAgain]

It’s a shame that the alleged judge also didn’t question the probable cause with any kind of judicial objectivity before proceeding to sign that warrant.

 

[Frankenstein]

That is just silly.

Warrant was granted by the court - meaning JUDGE who reviewed it DID find probable cause and whatever doubts anyone had were gone when illegally retained documents were confiscated at Mar-A-Lago.

What utter tripe, name the judge!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s a shame that the alleged judge also didn’t question the probable cause with any kind of judicial objectivity before proceeding to sign that warrant.

The judge of course did do that.

 

[BackAgain]

The judge of course did do that.

Bullshit.

He was just a low level rubber stamp.

 

[Frankenstein]

The judge of course did do that.

Name the Judge!

 

[martybegan]

Actually, a refund will be mandatory, if overturned.

How so?

Again, no law was being broken, it was being interpreted, and there is no prior court case to challenge that interpretation.

The SC will probably explicitly say so in any overturn of the tariffs anyway.

 

[BackAgain]

Name the Judge!

Reinhart. (Spelling optional).

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-09/08.31.23.%20--%20Mar-a-Lago%20Search%20Warrant%20-%20Interim.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com