FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[martybegan]

Actually William Barr said it best.
That if it was true that Trump declassified the contents of those boxes, that would be worse than possession of the classified materials.

In fact, I believe Trump doing so, would be a clearly impeachable act, if not actual treason. Giving aid and comfort to our enemies.

Akin to Benedict Arnold planning to surrender West Point.

What a bunch of made up bullshit.

Either cut down on the drugs, or up your meds.

 

[Delldude]

Actually William Barr said it best.
That if it was true that Trump declassified the contents of those boxes, that would be worse than possession of the classified materials.

In fact, I believe Trump doing so, would be a clearly impeachable act, if not actual treason. Giving aid and comfort to our enemies.

Akin to Benedict Arnold planning to surrender West Point.

That same Bill Barr who said the cameras were broken?

 

[postman]

The magistrate judge who signed off on that search warrant didn’t seem to give a shit about either of those questions before making his decision to sign the warrant.

In brief, the search warrant application failed to articulate any actual probable cause for that absurd search warrant.

This is mere fantasy speculation.
What next? A surgeon who doesn't wash his hands?

 

[Luckyone]

“FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal”​

FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI did not believe it had probable cause to raid President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in 2022, but moved forward amid pressure from the Biden Justice Department.

www.foxnews.com

Lawfare Democrats like Garland need to pay a heavy price for their actions. These criminals cannot be allowed to continue with their Soviet style show trials.

You are right, these "criminals" (Trump and his lawyers) should not be allowed to continue with their Soviet Style shows"

Trump Lawyer stating:



Reality:

 

[Rawley]

He also simultaneously violated the national security laws covering classified documents. Which have criminal penalties.

1,000% Ratty, Kudos.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I also didn’t say that the magistrate judge had not considered the warrant application.

You said he didn't consider it as he would any other or as any judge would.

You spouted that lie repeatedly.

You still are.

But what you will not be doing is offering any support for it.

 

[BackAgain]

From reading on this, I think DOJ made the comment that they 'convinced' the judge there was probable cause and he bit. No where is it said the judge came to a conclusion based on provided evidence, only he was 'convinced'.

Judges who sign search warrants often do so based on factual allegations which, IF TRUE, would support the determination that there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed. That’s how it’s supposed to work.

But even if every factual allegation in that absurd application for a search warrant had been determined to be a fair statement of the “evidence,” it still failed to state what alleged “crime or crimes” had supposedly been committed.

PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT? Nope. Not even a criminal statute.

POSSESSION of CLASSIFIED PAPERS? Nope. To establish that in a warrant would have required some factual allegations to the effect that the President had not already declassified them.

Maybe I missed those allegations in the application for the search warrant. Can anybody find them there?

Here’s the link again:

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-09/08.31.23.%20--%20Mar-a-Lago%20Search%20Warrant%20-%20Interim.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

[BackAgain]

You said he didn't consider it as he would any other or as any judge would.

You spouted that lie repeatedly.

You still are.

But what you will not be doing is offering any support for it.

I stand by what I did actually say. Your spin on it is dishonest.

Here’s a notion. Just quote what I DID actually post since you have no credibility.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Judges who sign search warrants often do so based on factual allegations which, IF TRUE, would support the determination that there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed. That’s how it’s supposed to work.

But even if every factual allegation in that absurd application for a search warrant had been determined to be a fair statement of the “evidence,” it still failed to state what alleged “crime or crimes” had supposedly been committed.

PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT? Nope. Not even a criminal statute.

POSSESSION of CLASSIFIED PAPERS? Nope. To establish that in a warrant would have required some factual allegations to the effect that the President had not already declassified them.

Maybe I missed those allegations in the application for the search warrant. Can anybody find them there?

Here’s the link again:

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-09/08.31.23.%20--%20Mar-a-Lago%20Search%20Warrant%20-%20Interim.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

And the warrant was spot on, and they found precisely the evidence they said they would find, precisely where they said they would find it.

No process of declassification found. Trump was asked for such information. He lied instead. Those options got exhausted, thus the valid warrsmy

Then he destroyed evidence..

He begged to get raided, and he got raided.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I stand by what I did actually say.

Yes, a single, copy paste talking point that is stupid.

"They had to have evidence the docs were not declassified"

That's stupid and wrong.

 

[BackAgain]

Actually William Barr said it best.
That if it was true that Trump declassified the contents of those boxes, that would be worse than possession of the classified materials.

In fact, I believe Trump doing so, would be a clearly impeachable act, if not actual treason. Giving aid and comfort to our enemies.

Akin to Benedict Arnold planning to surrender West Point.

Bill Barr was wrong. What he said wasn’t the “best.” It was just an opinion.

The rest of your post is nonsense.

 

[BackAgain]

This is mere fantasy speculation.
What next? A surgeon who doesn't wash his hands?

I am guessing that you imagined that you were making some solid argument. It was neither solid nor an argument.

In fact, it was incoherent. Feel free to try again.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is mere fantasy speculation.

Correct. It's the Alamo of cultists who can't account for the evidence and the letter of the law.

Just as the corrupt Cannon dismissing the case was her and Trump's Alamo. Because they knew he would lose, on the merits.

 

[Blisterfinger]

He let them see the room, but they were forbidden from looking in the boxes.

So you're not far off, but it doesn't change anything about the fact that Trump hid the documents from the FBI which is illegal.

He showed them the boxes yet he hid them? Sounds like you got some explaining to do

 

[Marener]

He showed them the boxes yet he hid them? Sounds like you got some explaining to do

The documents were hidden inside the boxes.

 

[Blisterfinger]

The documents were hidden inside the boxes.

LOL right! It was all a political persecution. They really should have negotiated with Trump, maybe you wouldn't have lost that election.

 

[Marener]

LOL right! It was all a political persecution. They really should have negotiated with Trump, maybe you wouldn't have lost that election.

They don't have to negotiate with Trump. He received a subpoena and broke the law by refusing to comply with his legal obligations.

 

[postman]

You don't have proof of that.

You can prove me wrong by find even one decision where they said that.

But you won't, because it's a legally abhorrent idea.

 

[martybegan]

You can prove me wrong by find even one decision where they said that.

But you won't, because it's a legally abhorrent idea.

Did we prosecute all the people who had abortions before Roe got overturned?

Some of those laws were still on the books in some States.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Did we prosecute all the people who had abortions before Roe got overturned?

Some of those laws were still on the books in some States.

But were moot, while abortion was a constitutionally protected right for nearly 50 years.