FBI, Big Tech, Big Media: Partners in collusion

So much bullshit from one of the biggest garbage spewers here. A whole lot of bullshit already debunked and you just keep throwing it out anyway. By the way, legally blind just prevents you from driving (and some other activities). It doesn’t mean he literally can’t see. Oh wait, that means you actually have to look into the story rather than just repeat the Dim talking points. Your defending of Crackhead Hunter doesn’t make you look good....
If he could see close up, even with glasses, to repair computers, then he could see Hunter Biden close up, dropping off the laptop, too....

and should be able to identify him, as the person who dropped it off,

yet he is unwilling, to do that....?
 
So much bullshit from one of the biggest garbage spewers here. A whole lot of bullshit already debunked and you just keep throwing it out anyway. By the way, legally blind just prevents you from driving (and some other activities). It doesn’t mean he literally can’t see. Oh wait, that means you actually have to look into the story rather than just repeat the Dim talking points. Your defending of Crackhead Hunter doesn’t make you look good....

Is there a point, or even a fact in this "bullshit" post???

Yes, being legally blind literally means that you can't see. And it doesn't mean you can't drive. My youngest is legally blind and she has a driver's license, she just can't drive without glasses. I was very surprised she pass the test, but she did.

Crackhead Biden??? The continuing harassment of Hunter Biden by Republicans, is backfiring on you, bigly.
 
Is there a point, or even a fact in this "bullshit" post???

Yes, being legally blind literally means that you can't see. And it doesn't mean you can't drive. My youngest is legally blind and she has a driver's license, she just can't drive without glasses. I was very surprised she pass the test, but she did.

Crackhead Biden??? The continuing harassment of Hunter Biden by Republicans, is backfiring on you, bigly.
Are you literate? Do your have at least a grade school education? Oh that’s right, you just bleat the Dim party line. Never mind the verified photos, emails, text messages....
By the way, over half the country WANTS Hunter investigated, seeing as that shows just how compromised the pants shitter in chief is.

 
If he could see close up, even with glasses, to repair computers, then he could see Hunter Biden close up, dropping off the laptop, too....

and should be able to identify him, as the person who dropped it off,

yet he is unwilling, to do that....?
How do you know he was working the counter? Keep flailing....
 

FBI, Big Tech, Big Media: Partners in collusion

3 Dec2022 ~~ By Michael Goodwin


The bold release by Elon Musk of Twitter files on how and why employees blocked The Post’s 2020 bombshell on Hunter Biden’s laptop marks a defining moment in modern American history. The disturbing details of arrogance and ignorance revealed the so-called geniuses pulling the technology levers to be as supernatural as the man behind the curtain in “The Wizard of Oz.”
The deflating reaction in both is the same: Is that all there is?
In this case, no, not by a long shot. For Musk’s revelations must be the start of a national campaign to expose the entire picture of the unholy collusion between partisan government censors and Big Tech.
Consider that Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg recently admitted to podcaster Joe Rogan the FBI warned the company in the fall of 2020 to watch out for Russian disinformation schemes.
“The FBI came to us, some folks on our team, and was like ‘hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there’s about to be some kind of dump that’s similar to that.’”
Zuckerberg said that by way of explaining why Facebook limited and in some cases blocked users from sharing The Post’s laptop report.
Twitter obviously got the same warning, which almost certainly involved James Baker, a former FBI general counsel who was involved in investigating the Trump campaign in 2016 and now holds a similar position at Twitter. Naturally, the released files show he was without remorse or doubt in urging repression of The Post’s story.
Moreover, as Intercept reporter Lee Fang has detailed and as a former Twitter official confirmed, the FBI held weekly meetings in Silicon Valley with tech officials about policing disinformation. Of course, their definition of disinformation was so broad as to include virtually anything that made Joe Biden or Democrats look bad.
~Snip~
There are two basic possibilities for explaining media complicity. First, perhaps the Times, Washington Post, CNN and others, all of whom are often favored with partisan leaks from the Justice Department, got misled by the FBI into thinking the story was bogus.
Indeed, since then, they and other media laptop deniers have authenticated key contents, though in a scattered fashion that has left unexplored the central issue of Joe Biden’s role.
Did the president of the United States profit from the selling of access to him, and is he compromised in dealing with foreign powers? No one in Big Media seems to care.
~Snip~
Lest you forget their power, remember that Joe Biden was elected president because millions of voters were not allowed to learn The Post had unmasked his deep connections to his son’s corrupt schemes.
The people who did that are not threats to democracy. They are its destroyers.


Commentary:
Our country is being run by the most evil people on earth. They are doing everything they can to maintain position a power, and are destroying this country... we know now for as fact that our DOJ and FBI have been hopelessly corrupted. They've rigged elections and lied to us while we watch Cocaine, Crack, heroine, fentanyl and Marijuana pour into this country unabated....
Maoist Democrats, the DOJ and FBI are winning by killing Americans and are avoiding accountability while they kill our children.
OMG!!!!!!!
 
How do you know he was working the counter? Keep flailing....
The fact of the matter is that he was about to close his shop. As an common working American who would expect someone comin into is shop to be Biden's son.
Personally even now if Hunter walked down the street and passed me by I wouldn't blink. That is nothing unusual.
 

FBI, Big Tech, Big Media: Partners in collusion

3 Dec2022 ~~ By Michael Goodwin


The bold release by Elon Musk of Twitter files on how and why employees blocked The Post’s 2020 bombshell on Hunter Biden’s laptop marks a defining moment in modern American history. The disturbing details of arrogance and ignorance revealed the so-called geniuses pulling the technology levers to be as supernatural as the man behind the curtain in “The Wizard of Oz.”
The deflating reaction in both is the same: Is that all there is?
In this case, no, not by a long shot. For Musk’s revelations must be the start of a national campaign to expose the entire picture of the unholy collusion between partisan government censors and Big Tech.
Consider that Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg recently admitted to podcaster Joe Rogan the FBI warned the company in the fall of 2020 to watch out for Russian disinformation schemes.
“The FBI came to us, some folks on our team, and was like ‘hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there’s about to be some kind of dump that’s similar to that.’”
Zuckerberg said that by way of explaining why Facebook limited and in some cases blocked users from sharing The Post’s laptop report.
Twitter obviously got the same warning, which almost certainly involved James Baker, a former FBI general counsel who was involved in investigating the Trump campaign in 2016 and now holds a similar position at Twitter. Naturally, the released files show he was without remorse or doubt in urging repression of The Post’s story.
Moreover, as Intercept reporter Lee Fang has detailed and as a former Twitter official confirmed, the FBI held weekly meetings in Silicon Valley with tech officials about policing disinformation. Of course, their definition of disinformation was so broad as to include virtually anything that made Joe Biden or Democrats look bad.
~Snip~
There are two basic possibilities for explaining media complicity. First, perhaps the Times, Washington Post, CNN and others, all of whom are often favored with partisan leaks from the Justice Department, got misled by the FBI into thinking the story was bogus.
Indeed, since then, they and other media laptop deniers have authenticated key contents, though in a scattered fashion that has left unexplored the central issue of Joe Biden’s role.
Did the president of the United States profit from the selling of access to him, and is he compromised in dealing with foreign powers? No one in Big Media seems to care.
~Snip~
Lest you forget their power, remember that Joe Biden was elected president because millions of voters were not allowed to learn The Post had unmasked his deep connections to his son’s corrupt schemes.
The people who did that are not threats to democracy. They are its destroyers.


Commentary:
Our country is being run by the most evil people on earth. They are doing everything they can to maintain position a power, and are destroying this country... we know now for as fact that our DOJ and FBI have been hopelessly corrupted. They've rigged elections and lied to us while we watch Cocaine, Crack, heroine, fentanyl and Marijuana pour into this country unabated....
Maoist Democrats, the DOJ and FBI are winning by killing Americans and are avoiding accountability while they kill our children.
This is a lie.

There is no ‘collusion’ between the FBI and social media; the FBI didn’t ‘censor’ social media.
 
The fact of the matter is that he was about to close his shop. As an common working American who would expect someone comin into is shop to be Biden's son.
Personally even now if Hunter walked down the street and passed me by I wouldn't blink. That is nothing unusual.
The fact of the matter is that the thread premise is a lie.

The NY Post is an unreliable source and rightwing fake news site:

“Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks.”


It’s perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted for US intelligence agencies to notify and warn social media of cyber-attacks and misinformation campaigns by America’s enemies, such as the Russian lies about Hunter Biden.

Social media remain at liberty to use the information as they see fit, they alone decide how to edit their content based on the information provided.

There is no ‘collusion,’ no ‘partnership,’ nothing is ‘censored’ by the FBI or any other agency.
 
This is a lie.

There is no ‘collusion’ between the FBI and social media; the FBI didn’t ‘censor’ social media.
The E-mails produced from the Twitter server hard drives tell a different story. Even Zuckerberg admits the FBI was responsible for censorship of Hunter Laptop.
 
It sounds like you're incredibly frustrated with your station in life and need to blame someone else. hmmmmm.
~~~~~~
hmm..., [station in life], is that a racist remark? Are people now placed in divisions of cast, or levels of society?
Oh, I forgot all Maoist Democrat Commies either play the victim or think they're upper class above the law.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top