Fauci-Funded Wuhan Lab Viruses 10,000 Times Stronger Than Usual, Documents Show

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
91,452
62,229
2,605
Right coast, classified
What could possibly go wrong?
Oh yeah.
Worldwide pandemic, millions dead, global economy crashes.

And he’s our expert and the highest paid employee in the Federal government instead of swinging on gallows.

 
Utter BS - facts - but your motto is simple: "We don't need no no stinkin' facts."

The truth:
The focus on Fauci this week is related to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and published by the investigative news site the Intercept. The documents included details of a $3.1 million 2014 grant to EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based organization that has been the focus of intense scrutiny over its close partnership with China and because of the ardent rejections by its chief executive, Peter Daszak, of any suggestion that a scientific accident there may have caused the pandemic.

EcoHealth Alliance used $599,000 of the $3.1 million grant to fund a study into bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has itself been the focus of both conspiratorial and legitimate questions. Researchers there worked on a strain of coronavirus called WIV1, according to the Intercept.

Federal officials denied that the research conducted with U.S. funds in Wuhan met gain-of-function criteria. “NIH has never approved any research that would make a coronavirus more dangerous to humans. The research we supported in China, where coronaviruses are prevalent, sought to understand the behavior of coronaviruses circulating in bats that have the potential to cause widespread disease.”

The existence of WIV1 is hardly a secret, but the revelations in the Intercept’s reporting seem to challenge Fauci’s earlier statements that the U.S. biomedical establishment has never funded *gain-of-function research in China. “This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” one researcher told the Intercept.

*NOTE: What does gain of function mean? Any organism can acquire a new ability or property, or “gain” a “function.” This can happen through natural selection or a researcher’s experiments. In research, many different types of experiments generate functions, and some pose certain safety and security concerns. Scientists use a variety of techniques to modify organisms depending on the properties of the organism itself and the end goal. Some of these methods involve directly making changes at the level of genetic code. Others may involve placing organisms in environments that select for functions linked to genetic changes.

Gain of function can occur in an organism in either nature or the laboratory. Some lab examples include creating more salt- and drought-resistant plants or modifying disease vectors to produce mosquitoes that are resistant to transmitting dengue fever.
 
Last edited:
What could possibly go wrong?
Oh yeah.
Worldwide pandemic, millions dead, global economy crashes.

And he’s our expert and the highest paid employee in the Federal government instead of swinging on gallows.

Please stop getting your "information" from Facebook
 
FB_IMG_1626911952363.jpg
 
Utter BS - facts - but your motto is simple: "We don't need no no stinkin' facts."

The truth:
The focus on Fauci this week is related to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and published by the investigative news site the Intercept. The documents included details of a $3.1 million 2014 grant to EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based organization that has been the focus of intense scrutiny over its close partnership with China and because of the ardent rejections by its chief executive, Peter Daszak, of any suggestion that a scientific accident there may have caused the pandemic.

EcoHealth Alliance used $599,000 of the $3.1 million grant to fund a study into bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has itself been the focus of both conspiratorial and legitimate questions. Researchers there worked on a strain of coronavirus called WIV1, according to the Intercept.

Federal officials denied that the research conducted with U.S. funds in Wuhan met gain-of-function criteria. “NIH has never approved any research that would make a coronavirus more dangerous to humans. The research we supported in China, where coronaviruses are prevalent, sought to understand the behavior of coronaviruses circulating in bats that have the potential to cause widespread disease.”

The existence of WIV1 is hardly a secret, but the revelations in the Intercept’s reporting seem to challenge Fauci’s earlier statements that the U.S. biomedical establishment has never funded *gain-of-function research in China. “This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” one researcher told the Intercept.

*NOTE: What does gain of function mean? Any organism can acquire a new ability or property, or “gain” a “function.” This can happen through natural selection or a researcher’s experiments. In research, many different types of experiments generate functions, and some pose certain safety and security concerns. Scientists use a variety of techniques to modify organisms depending on the properties of the organism itself and the end goal. Some of these methods involve directly making changes at the level of genetic code. Others may involve placing organisms in environments that select for functions linked to genetic changes.

Gain of function can occur in an organism in either nature or the laboratory. Some lab examples include creating more salt- and drought-resistant plants or modifying disease vectors to produce mosquitoes that are resistant to transmitting dengue fever.

So the NIH DID fund Wuhan Gain of Function.

Thank you!!
 
What could possibly go wrong?
Oh yeah.
Worldwide pandemic, millions dead, global economy crashes.

And he’s our expert and the highest paid employee in the Federal government instead of swinging on gallows.

Yes, that’s likely why the freudian slip when Fau Chi got the D614G mutation backwards in his video. That’s the mutation that significantly increases VSV particles. This links to VSV-based ebola vaccine.
 

Forum List

Back
Top