Fauci-Funded Wuhan Lab Viruses 10,000 Times Stronger Than Usual, Documents Show

[Puma Punku]

Some Americans believe that Fauci did have a hand in funding the Wuhan Lab. Some Americans believe that Fauci downplayed the possibility of the virus coming from the Wuhan lab. Some Americans believe that powerful "therapeutic treatments" were purposefully downplayed by Fauci. Some Americans are resentful that he was untruthful when he told us not to "mask up" as a lie to keep us from hoarding the masks. Some Americans question why Fauci seems to be silent about the spread from our southern borders....This American believes that replacing Fauci as our nation's most visible authority on this pandemic (and our way forward) is long overdue.

 

[badger2]

Any discourse on the Mu variant from Columbia (Jan 2021) should bear in mind that it contains “Fau Chi’s mutation” D614G, glycine being a most primitive amino along with alanine, were the two most abundant aminos generated in the Miller-Urey volcanic spark experiments on the origins of life (~1959).

Fathead minnow coronavirus spike corresponds to Mu variant mutations at these locations, Mu entries are first:

N501Y Fathead, without mutating: Y501

D109N Fathead, without mutating: N109

Y144S Fathead, without mutating: S144

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Any discourse on the Mu variant from Columbia (Jan 2021) should bear in mind that it contains “Fau Chi’s mutation” D614G, glycine being a most primitive amino along with alanine, were the two most abundant aminos generated in the Miller-Urey volcanic spark experiments on the origins of life (~1959).

Fathead minnow coronavirus spike corresponds to Mu variant mutations at these locations, Mu entries are first:

N501Y Fathead, without mutating: Y501

D109N Fathead, without mutating: N109

Y144S Fathead, without mutating: S144

You aren't going to convince any of these knuckle draggers worshipping at the altar of Fauci. The lot of them combined haven't taken a single course in molecular biology or microbiology. You may as well be posting hieroglyphs.

 

[badger2]

Which amino acid changes are causing this supposed 10,000-fold increase?

 

[Eyepublius]

Utter BS - facts - but your motto is simple: "We don't need no no stinkin' facts."

The truth: The focus on Fauci this week is related to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and published by the investigative news site the Intercept. The documents included details of a $3.1 million 2014 grant to EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based organization that has been the focus of intense scrutiny over its close partnership with China and because of the ardent rejections by its chief executive, Peter Daszak, of any suggestion that a scientific accident there may have caused the pandemic.

EcoHealth Alliance used $599,000 of the $3.1 million grant to fund a study into bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has itself been the focus of both conspiratorial and legitimate questions. Researchers there worked on a strain of coronavirus called WIV1, according to the Intercept.

Federal officials denied that the research conducted with U.S. funds in Wuhan met gain-of-function criteria. “NIH has never approved any research that would make a coronavirus more dangerous to humans. The research we supported in China, where coronaviruses are prevalent, sought to understand the behavior of coronaviruses circulating in bats that have the potential to cause widespread disease.”

The existence of WIV1 is hardly a secret, but the revelations in the Intercept’s reporting seem to challenge Fauci’s earlier statements that the U.S. biomedical establishment has never funded *gain-of-function research in China. “This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” one researcher told the Intercept.

*NOTE: What does gain of function mean? Any organism can acquire a new ability or property, or “gain” a “function.” This can happen through natural selection or a researcher’s experiments. In research, many different types of experiments generate functions, and some pose certain safety and security concerns. Scientists use a variety of techniques to modify organisms depending on the properties of the organism itself and the end goal. Some of these methods involve directly making changes at the level of genetic code. Others may involve placing organisms in environments that select for functions linked to genetic changes.

Gain of function can occur in an organism in either nature or the laboratory. Some lab examples include creating more salt- and drought-resistant plants or modifying disease vectors to produce mosquitoes that are resistant to transmitting dengue fever.

Disagree or not the facts stand on their own - your FOX-related views and opinions mean squat... shame on you both... but not surprised,

 

[flacaltenn]

Utter BS - facts - but your motto is simple: "We don't need no no stinkin' facts."

The truth: The focus on Fauci this week is related to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and published by the investigative news site the Intercept. The documents included details of a $3.1 million 2014 grant to EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based organization that has been the focus of intense scrutiny over its close partnership with China and because of the ardent rejections by its chief executive, Peter Daszak, of any suggestion that a scientific accident there may have caused the pandemic.

EcoHealth Alliance used $599,000 of the $3.1 million grant to fund a study into bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has itself been the focus of both conspiratorial and legitimate questions. Researchers there worked on a strain of coronavirus called WIV1, according to the Intercept.

Federal officials denied that the research conducted with U.S. funds in Wuhan met gain-of-function criteria. “NIH has never approved any research that would make a coronavirus more dangerous to humans. The research we supported in China, where coronaviruses are prevalent, sought to understand the behavior of coronaviruses circulating in bats that have the potential to cause widespread disease.”

The existence of WIV1 is hardly a secret, but the revelations in the Intercept’s reporting seem to challenge Fauci’s earlier statements that the U.S. biomedical establishment has never funded *gain-of-function research in China. “This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” one researcher told the Intercept.

*NOTE: What does gain of function mean? Any organism can acquire a new ability or property, or “gain” a “function.” This can happen through natural selection or a researcher’s experiments. In research, many different types of experiments generate functions, and some pose certain safety and security concerns. Scientists use a variety of techniques to modify organisms depending on the properties of the organism itself and the end goal. Some of these methods involve directly making changes at the level of genetic code. Others may involve placing organisms in environments that select for functions linked to genetic changes.

Gain of function can occur in an organism in either nature or the laboratory. Some lab examples include creating more salt- and drought-resistant plants or modifying disease vectors to produce mosquitoes that are resistant to transmitting dengue fever.

That broader definition of GoFunction is NOT applicable when the science is being closeted in a virology research institute.. You've been smoke-screened and derailed here.

In terms of VIROLOGY -- gain of function implies pathogen enhancement for HUMAN INFECTION..

Dont' be a Fauci..

 

[badger2]

That broader definition of GoFunction is NOT applicable when the science is being closeted in a virology research institute.. You've been smoke-screened and derailed here.

In terms of VIROLOGY -- gain of function implies pathogen enhancement for HUMAN INFECTION..

Dont' be a Fauci..

Loci in the sequence that should have been manipulated for GOF are not. The only alternative is nature.

 

[flacaltenn]

Loci in the sequence that should have been manipulated for GOF are not. The only alternative is nature.

You're looking at ONE small snippet of sequencing out of many.. The equivalent of being shocked to find or not find the first name Quincy in a random page of a phonebook.. Nature does this on a scale of decades and there would be fingerprints in a host that FIRST had to host a mutation that even ALLOWS transmission to humans.. That fingerprint has YET to found for any suspected species vector.

My understanding is that the "human fingerprints" on the genetic modifications are NOT FOUND in small snippets around say - the spike proteins -- but in artifacts left by CRISPR techniques occuring during the spicing.

Not only that -- but SEEING THE SAME sequences for all the resulting variants to SARS CV2 means nothing because the adaptations for say the spike protein designs CAN happen quickly in the ancestors of the ORIGINAL SARS- CV2.. Because that is EXPECTED.. It's what simple organisms like viruses DO to survive..

That's WAAAY different than seeing a GofFunction occur IN NATURE THAT IS SPECIFIC to making something like a "delta variant" MORE communicable in humans. So you're confusing what happens once the host is HUMAN with how an animal virus GOT to be SARS-CV2..

 

[Eyepublius]

That broader definition of GoFunction is NOT applicable when the science is being closeted in a virology research institute.. You've been smoke-screened and derailed here.

In terms of VIROLOGY -- gain of function implies pathogen enhancement for HUMAN INFECTION..

Dont' be a Fauci..

Gain of Function is only bad because the GOP right wing makes it sound bad and it is not... it is a standard part of studying viruses to find cures and/or vaccines to prevent ones in the future -- try a little more study and research... very refreshing.

 

[badger2]

The 10,000-fold increase is flaunted as yellopw journalism though not named.

You're looking at ONE small snippet of sequencing out of many.. The equivalent of being shocked to find or not find the first name Quincy in a random page of a phonebook.. Nature does this on a scale of decades and there would be fingerprints in a host that FIRST had to host a mutation that even ALLOWS transmission to humans.. That fingerprint has YET to found for any suspected species vector.

My understanding is that the "human fingerprints" on the genetic modifications are NOT FOUND in small snippets around say - the spike proteins -- but in artifacts left by CRISPR techniques occuring during the spicing.

Not only that -- but SEEING THE SAME sequences for all the resulting variants to SARS CV2 means nothing because the adaptations for say the spike protein designs CAN happen quickly in the ancestors of the ORIGINAL SARS- CV2.. Because that is EXPECTED.. It's what simple organisms like viruses DO to survive..

That's WAAAY different than seeing a GofFunction occur IN NATURE THAT IS SPECIFIC to making something like a "delta variant" MORE communicable in humans. So you're confusing what happens once the host is HUMAN with how an animal virus GOT to be SARS-CV2..

Your reasoning is contradictory. Humans are also animals and there’s no confusion once one understands things such as....

’Residue 479 is an asparagine or serine in all S proteins isolated from humans either during the 2002-3 epidemic or during 2003-4 infections. However, most sequences isolated from palm civets or raccoon dogs encode a lysine at position 479. The lysine is incompatible with humans ACE2, but palm civet ACE2 can efficiently bind S proteins expressing either lysine or asparagine, without an apparent preference for either. Palm civets mat therefore be an important intermediate in the transfer of SARS-CoV to humans, permitting the emergence of viruses that express a small, uncharged amino acid at S protein residue 479.’
(Li, et al, The Ace2 Cellular Receptor, in Nidoviruses ASM Press, 2008)

 

[flacaltenn]

Gain of Function is only bad because the GOP right wing makes it sound bad and it is not... it is a standard part of studying viruses to find cures and/or vaccines to prevent ones in the future -- try a little more study and research... very refreshing.

That's not true.. Your Fauci hero KNOWS the VALUE of GofFunction.. He has often promoted it as a NECESSARY ADJUNCT to biological warfare.. That's it's PRIMARY purpose in a very large expensive govt Virology lab..

Striking that you're so opinionated here, but obviously dont know the history here of "DUAL USE" GofFunction research.. Fauci has called funding for this a "two-fer' , because it advances public health knowledge about quickly identifying potentially dangerous viruses, but also serves the biological warfare and defense needs for PROTECTING from attacks.. Fauci is on record quipping that "you dont want to do this dangerous research in Hoboken N.J" and UNDERSTANDS the risks.

You're completely unaware of the battle Dr. Doom lost in 2012, when 100s of US virologists and epidemiologists ganged up on the Fed Govt to BAN THIS RESEARCH IN U.S. It WAS BANNED here in 2012 and that ban lasted THRU the Trump Admin, but Fauci got AROUND THAT BAN around around 2017 with grants to ECO-Health labs that SUBCONTRACTED the Wuhan lab.. --- BECAUSE this was "too dangerous for Hoboken".. OF COURSE he's gonna obfuscate and deny..

Here is Dr Fauci making that argument in 2012 during a Senate Committee meeting. You need to educate yourself as to the RISKS of GOF in virology labs before you look stupid.

 

[flacaltenn]

Fauci laid the basis for his prosecution at that statement to Congress. "Dual Use Research of Concern" -- should NOT be prohibited.".. HE LOST THAT ARGUMENT TO SCIENTISTS NOT ON THE PUBLIC DOLE who had better judgement than just greasing the NIH funding skids..

 

[flacaltenn]

The 10,000-fold increase is flaunted as yellopw journalism though not named.

Your reasoning is contradictory. Humans are also animals and there’s no confusion once one understands things such as....

’Residue 479 is an asparagine or serine in all S proteins isolated from humans either during the 2002-3 epidemic or during 2003-4 infections. However, most sequences isolated from palm civets or raccoon dogs encode a lysine at position 479. The lysine is incompatible with humans ACE2, but palm civet ACE2 can efficiently bind S proteins expressing either lysine or asparagine, without an apparent preference for either. Palm civets mat therefore be an important intermediate in the transfer of SARS-CoV to humans, permitting the emergence of viruses that express a small, uncharged amino acid at S protein residue 479.’
(Li, et al, The Ace2 Cellular Receptor, in Nidoviruses ASM Press, 2008)

NONE OF THAT is GOF applied to HUMAN VIROLOGY.. Fauci used the H1NI epidemic in that time period to argue that it was IMPERATIVE to SPEED UP NATURE and MOVE that virus from chicken to human IN THE LAB.. That's the entire point here. GOF is not about what's POSSIBLE IN NATURE.. It's all about MAKING it happen at OUR convenience in a lab.. Even argued that the funding should NOT BE CUT, because of the "dual use value" to military and bioweapons research..

THIS is the REAL meaning of GOF applied in a virology lab setting..

 

[badger2]

NONE OF THAT is GOF applied to HUMAN VIROLOGY.. Fauci used the H1NI epidemic in that time period to argue that it was IMPERATIVE to SPEED UP NATURE and MOVE that virus from chicken to human IN THE LAB.. That's the entire point here. GOF is not about what's POSSIBLE IN NATURE.. It's all about MAKING it happen at OUR convenience in a lab.. Even argued that the funding should NOT BE CUT, because of the "dual use value" to military and bioweapons research..

THIS is the REAL meaning of GOF applied in a virology lab setting..

You attempt to anthropomorphize the situation and throw the baby out with the bathwater. There are always already two populations of SARS-CoV-2, one human-host the other non-human host. So which animal was used in the lab with this 10,000-fold increase fairy tale? How could they not use an animal model and rely on only cells without this story looking more absurd than it already is?

You have further problems, noting Obama and Bidern-funding for Duke-NUS Singapore, which adenovirus technology went on to vaccinate the Russian military. Baby’s bathwater applies here also, because Daszak (Eco Health Alliance) attended the international Nipah conference at Singapore, home of adenovirus outbreaks in humans. Henipaviruses (family includes Nipah) occur at Mojiang, home of SARS-CoV-2’s closest relative, RaTG13. Filoviruses (ebola-Marburg family) occur at Mengla, not far from Tongguan’s copper mine in Mojiang.

 

[Mac1958]

Please stop getting your "information" from Facebook

One of the key "news sources" of the alternate universe.

 

[badger2]

The first thing the prisoner experiences is the pre-castrated search for the 2012 video (above) at youtube, because fascist forces are reifying Fau’s current limelight videos, even if the prisoner types in “2012.”

The date is important, because it links the chron to the Mojiang miners.

26 Ap 2012 Dual Use Research of Concern: Balancing Benefits and Risks

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Testimony-Fauci-2012-04-26.pdf

 

[badger2]

The ill Mojiang miners were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (on the day [italics]) that Fau Chi published his Dual Use Research of Concern document, 26 Ap 2012, and also admitted to the hospital on the 27th. The samples were collected by hospital staff in June, July, Aug and Sep of 2012 and transferred to the Wuhan lab.

 

[Mac-7]

They created a bioweapon and we helped pay for it. If they pay no price for this, why would they refrain from using an even more powerful one in the future?

I dont think even a lib like fauci would knowingly help pay for chinese bioweapons

But what he was thinking boggles the mind

How could even libs be that stupid?

 

[dudmuck]

Yes, that’s likely why the freudian slip when Fau Chi got the D614G mutation backwards in his video. That’s the mutation that significantly increases VSV particles. This links to VSV-based ebola vaccine.

lineage B.1.617.2 is what we have now, more than 99 percent of them. Which lab created that?

 

[SavannahMann]

Not to worry. We have figured out how to profit from the Vaccine Fools.