Father arrested at school board meeting for exceeding his allotted two minutes

[PaintMyHouse]

“‘Relax,’ Matt murmured, and then he sank his teeth into her shoulder. He pinned her hands over her head and ground his hips against hers. She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach. ”

… She couldn’t remember ever feeling so heavy, as if her heart were beating between her legs. She clawed at Matt’s back to bring him closer. “‘Yeah,’ he groaned, and her pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs.

… (H)e clamped his hand over her mouth and drove harder and harder until Josie felt him come.

“Semen, sticky and hot, pooled on the carpet beneath her.”



That is the text that this father protested. And you liberals think this porn is appropriate for preteens & slightly older?

And just to prove how wrong it was the father asked ANYONE on the school board to read the passage. All of them, including the principle, refused with the principal actually admitting that they wouldn't be "comfortable" reading it aloud during the meeting. But yet somehow it was good enough for tweens to read....

Go ahead and defend it again....

Is there anyone here who would in fact read this to one 9f their 12,13 or 14 year old children?

That age can not only read it, it does it. I did, younger than that by a year. Let's mush on.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

“‘Relax,’ Matt murmured, and then he sank his teeth into her shoulder. He pinned her hands over her head and ground his hips against hers. She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach. ”

… She couldn’t remember ever feeling so heavy, as if her heart were beating between her legs. She clawed at Matt’s back to bring him closer. “‘Yeah,’ he groaned, and her pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs.

… (H)e clamped his hand over her mouth and drove harder and harder until Josie felt him come.

“Semen, sticky and hot, pooled on the carpet beneath her.”



That is the text that this father protested. And you liberals think this porn is appropriate for preteens & slightly older?

And just to prove how wrong it was the father asked ANYONE on the school board to read the passage. All of them, including the principle, refused with the principal actually admitting that they wouldn't be "comfortable" reading it aloud during the meeting. But yet somehow it was good enough for tweens to read....

Go ahead and defend it again....

Is there anyone here who would in fact read this to one 9f their 12,13 or 14 year old children?

That age can not only read it, it does it. I did, younger than that by a year. Let's mush on.

That wasn't my question. Nice dodge.

By your assertion we should also overlook cigarette, drug & alcohol use since s9me of us did that at that age as well.

Terrible logic

 

[Newby]

“‘Relax,’ Matt murmured, and then he sank his teeth into her shoulder. He pinned her hands over her head and ground his hips against hers. She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach. ”

… She couldn’t remember ever feeling so heavy, as if her heart were beating between her legs. She clawed at Matt’s back to bring him closer. “‘Yeah,’ he groaned, and her pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs.

… (H)e clamped his hand over her mouth and drove harder and harder until Josie felt him come.

“Semen, sticky and hot, pooled on the carpet beneath her.”



That is the text that this father protested. And you liberals think this porn is appropriate for preteens & slightly older?

And just to prove how wrong it was the father asked ANYONE on the school board to read the passage. All of them, including the principle, refused with the principal actually admitting that they wouldn't be "comfortable" reading it aloud during the meeting. But yet somehow it was good enough for tweens to read....

Go ahead and defend it again....

Is there anyone here who would in fact read this to one 9f their 12,13 or 14 year old children?

That age can not only read it, it does it. I did, younger than that by a year. Let's mush on.

And based on how you represent yourself on here you think that is somehow a positive endorcement?

 

[hazlnut]

Dad Arrested After Protesting Book Being Read At Daughter's High School

So we pass students who fail to protect their "social status" but arrest parents for being involved.

Liberals have DESTROYED the education system in this country.

The thread title is a LIE. That's not why he was arrested.

Why are some of you far-righties so DISHONEST?

Why do you do that, Gramps? Make shit up.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Dad Arrested After Protesting Book Being Read At Daughter's High School

So we pass students who fail to protect their "social status" but arrest parents for being involved.

Liberals have DESTROYED the education system in this country.

The thread title is a LIE. That's not why he was arrested.

Why are some of you far-righties so DISHONEST?

Why do you do that, Gramps? Make shit up.

Go **** yourself hack

 

[bodecea]

Dad Arrested After Protesting Book Being Read At Daughter's High School

So we pass students who fail to protect their "social status" but arrest parents for being involved.

Liberals have DESTROYED the education system in this country.

The thread title is a LIE. That's not why he was arrested.

Why are some of you far-righties so DISHONEST?

Why do you do that, Gramps? Make shit up.

Go **** yourself hack

Is the thread title a lie? Was he arrested for exceeding his 2 minutes? Or was he arrested for something else he did afterwards? How about the truth?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The thread title is a LIE. That's not why he was arrested.

Why are some of you far-righties so DISHONEST?

Why do you do that, Gramps? Make shit up.

Go **** yourself hack

Is the thread title a lie? Was he arrested for exceeding his 2 minutes? Or was he arrested for something else he did afterwards? How about the truth?

The title is accurate. The video CLEARLY shows the events in question.

Funny some schmucks call my title a lie yet if you like your insurance you can keep it is not.

Hacks being hacks

 

[Newby]

The thread title is a LIE. That's not why he was arrested.

Why are some of you far-righties so DISHONEST?

Why do you do that, Gramps? Make shit up.

Go **** yourself hack

Is the thread title a lie? Was he arrested for exceeding his 2 minutes? Or was he arrested for something else he did afterwards? How about the truth?

What's the truth, since you seem to know?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It's always amusing to witness the hypocrisy of so called "liberals" steadfastly supporting the thuggish police state.

 

[bodecea]

Go **** yourself hack

Is the thread title a lie? Was he arrested for exceeding his 2 minutes? Or was he arrested for something else he did afterwards? How about the truth?

The title is accurate. The video CLEARLY shows the events in question.

Funny some schmucks call my title a lie yet if you like your insurance you can keep it is not.

Hacks being hacks

So the charge is "talking past your allotted 2 minutes"....could you link the legal statute that he was charged under then?

 

[bodecea]

Go **** yourself hack

Is the thread title a lie? Was he arrested for exceeding his 2 minutes? Or was he arrested for something else he did afterwards? How about the truth?

What's the truth, since you seem to know?

I'm asking questions ergo "I seem to know"? Huh?

 

[bodecea]

Watching the video....I guess some are saying that people should be allowed to disrupt meetings....public meetings. Fine. Let's make that ok....for everyone. No cops in the room...at all...ever.

 

[Newby]

Is the thread title a lie? Was he arrested for exceeding his 2 minutes? Or was he arrested for something else he did afterwards? How about the truth?

What's the truth, since you seem to know?

I'm asking questions ergo "I seem to know"? Huh?

Yes, you're making implications without having even watched the video of it. So when you watch the video, let us know what law he violated that warranted arrest.

 

[bodecea]

What's the truth, since you seem to know?

I'm asking questions ergo "I seem to know"? Huh?

Yes, you're making implications without having even watched the video of it. So when you watch the video, let us know what law he violated that warranted arrest.

Watched the video....so, the deal is....let's let people disrupt meetings to their heart's content.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Is the thread title a lie? Was he arrested for exceeding his 2 minutes? Or was he arrested for something else he did afterwards? How about the truth?

The title is accurate. The video CLEARLY shows the events in question.

Funny some schmucks call my title a lie yet if you like your insurance you can keep it is not.

Hacks being hacks

So the charge is "talking past your allotted 2 minutes"....could you link the legal statute that he was charged under then?

Don't start being a semantics playing hack. If I rob the first national bank im not charged with that. I'm charged with armed robbery. If I beat the shit out of someone im not charged with beating the shit out of someone, I'm charged with aggravated battery.

Stop playing games and don't make me regret the fact that I took you off ignore a couple months back.

 

[boilermaker55]

Some on here are the same ones that were aghast when someone interrupted the speaker at tea party town halls.
They felt it was so unruly to not let someone speak.
Hypocrites.

 

[g5000]

Law and order...I guess it is something of the past and we should all submit to anarchy.

Cause and effect...no one seems to want to accept responsibility for their actions anymore. This is the same as hecklers getting arrested when they interrupted GOP candidates and W.

Anyone who thinks this man shouldn't have been removed from the meeting is either an anarchist who has zero respect for law and order or a hypocrite.

My issue isn't his removal. My issue is his arrest. It was unnecessary

I can appreciate that. I just happen to believe in law and order - cause and effect. I agree that this book is nonsense and pre-teens shouldn't be forced to read it...but there is a lawful way to protest. Even with civil disobedience, there are consequences. Obvious this man was willing to face those consequences. I support him, but just because we believe something is right or wrong, it doesn't give us the right to circumvent the law and deny other people to speak and express their opinions. Freedom of speech is for everyone, no?

Arresting the father was extreme overkill. There are several other better ways that situation could have been handled instead of acting like thugs toward the guy.

 

[Mustang]

Dad Arrested After Protesting Book Being Read At Daughter's High School

So we pass students who fail to protect their "social status" but arrest parents for being involved.

Liberals have DESTROYED the education system in this country.

I soon as I saw the subject line, I just KNEW it was typical conservative misdirection BS. Sure enough, I read the story, and the man was arrested for disorderly conduct. The only thing I wonder at this point is whether or not the man WANTED to get arrested in order to bring more attention to this issue. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if he had already lined up some RW organization to take up his cause and sue the school district.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Dad Arrested After Protesting Book Being Read At Daughter's High School

So we pass students who fail to protect their "social status" but arrest parents for being involved.

Liberals have DESTROYED the education system in this country.

I soon as I saw the subject line, I just KNEW it was typical conservative misdirection BS. Sure enough, I read the story, and the man was arrested for disorderly conduct. The only thing I wonder at this point is whether or not the man WANTED to get arrested in order to bring more attention to this issue. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if he had already lined up some RW organization to take up his cause and sue the school district.

Another idiot. The ONLY thing he did that garnered him the disorderly conduct charge was TALK PAST HIS TWO MINUTES

 

[g5000]

Dad Arrested After Protesting Book Being Read At Daughter's High School

So we pass students who fail to protect their "social status" but arrest parents for being involved.

Liberals have DESTROYED the education system in this country.

I soon as I saw the subject line, I just KNEW it was typical conservative misdirection BS. Sure enough, I read the story, and the man was arrested for disorderly conduct. The only thing I wonder at this point is whether or not the man WANTED to get arrested in order to bring more attention to this issue. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if he had already lined up some RW organization to take up his cause and sue the school district.

So the best idea you can come up with to handle a guy who is not shouting or threatening in any way is to arrest him? Really?