Fanni Willis Takes Jim Jordan To Task: You Lack Basic Understanding Of The Law

[BackAgain]

The Bar Exam is the test that allows you to practice Law. It is what you take to get your law license. You have to pass law school to take the test, but you can’t practice law without the Bar.

So graduating doesn’t make you a practicing lawyer.

Close. In most states, one needs to graduate law school to practice law. But at least it used to be true that if you graduated law school in Wyoming, you were automatically not just a lawyer, but an admitted attorney at law.

Nowadays, in most of not all states, a JD makes you a lawyer. But passing the Bar is required to be an admitted practicing attorney at law.

 

[beautress]

Fani was part of the prosecution that went after teachers accused of fixing test scores. She went after them (using Rico) after standerdized test scores (implemented during Bush and Obama) were used to evaluate teachers which affected teacher salaries. Some teachers cheated by falsifying test scores. Many teachers pleaded, one was acquitted. Half a dozen are appealing. The main 'kingpin' Dana Evans (former principal) was sentenced to 1 year in jail for supposedly failing to stop the cheating although she herself was not found culpable. Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter reduced her sentence to probation and community service. Hardly a resounding victory for Fani. Now, here she is trying the same shit all over again. She's doing exactly what Marxists do, undermine the tenets of a society by using the legal system. Merrick Garland is letting her get away with it too. He's worse than her.

And that's not all: her office made a judgmental call against President Trump by releasing information to the public before any hearing was held. That should disbar any attorney affiliated with the hack job they have planned for President Trump in Georgia, and it's evil what she did to make sure everybody knows how much she hates President Trump. She's gone mad.

^^Judge on Fani Willis appearance of conflict in Trump probe due to fundraiser: 'The optics are horrific...."​

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It's against the Constitution for a prosecutor to announce she is going to "get Trump" when she was campaigning for her job, and then weaponizes that job to actually do him in. For her crime against the Constitution and President Trump, she may not be as smart as she thinks she is in getting away with that. She may face disbarment as well.

No, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.

Trump tried to weaponize the Presidency and now is attempt to do so with his campaign. So far he is failing.

She will convict Trump. She will become a Senator. Trump will be remanded into federal custody.

 

[SavannahMann]

Close. In most states, one needs to graduate law school to practice law. But at least it used to be true that if you graduated law school in Wyoming, you were automatically not just a lawyer, but an admitted attorney at law.

Nowadays, in most of not all states, a JD makes you a lawyer. But passing the Bar is required to be an admitted practicing attorney at law.

And Fanni Willis’s point is true. If Jim didn’t pass the Bar he never practiced law.

 

[Leo123]

And that's not all: her office made a judgmental call against President Trump by releasing information to the public before any hearing was held. That should disbar any attorney affiliated with the hack job they have planned for President Trump in Georgia, and it's evil what she did to make sure everybody knows how much she hates President Trump. She's gone mad.

^^Judge on Fani Willis appearance of conflict in Trump probe due to fundraiser: 'The optics are horrific...."​

Jury tampering.

 

[0311]

It's against the Constitution for a prosecutor to announce she is going to "get Trump"

Please cite the specific amendment in which a prosecutor is forbidden from saying whom they ware going get. The specific part of the Constitution, the specific clause and/amendment.

As often as you people shouted, "LOCK HER UP", with no real grounds for doing so, you must know how wrong you are. HRC broke no law, you people announcing you were going to her, how exactly is that different.

You have no idea of what you are talking about and it shows.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You need a new line.

He has probably been taking lessons from CClaytonJones.

 

[Leo123]

Please cite the specific amendment in which a prosecutor is forbidden from saying whom they ware going get. The specific part of the Constitution, the specific clause and/amendment.

You have no idea of what you are talking about and it shows.

Please cite anywhere in American law where a citizen is presumed guilty unless proven innocent. You Marxies always get it backwards. Any prosecutor that blabs about the guilt of the person they are prosecuting would be rightly called out by the legal system. Every good prosecutor knows they have to have EVIDENCE to 'get' their targeted perp and THEN go to trial and get a jury finding in your favor. Running around bragging they are going to 'get' someone is grounds for removing them from the case because any decent defense council would legally tear them apart. Unless. of course, the DOJ has it in for the Defendant.

 

[beautress]

No, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.

Trump tried to weaponize the Presidency and now is attempt to do so with his campaign. So far he is failing.

She will convict Trump. She will become a Senator. Trump will be remanded into federal custody.

My opinion is she's half an inch away from a full disbarment which she deserves for making public recriminations of charges against Trump that have not gone to trial yet. That is beneath the pale and yes, it is against the spirit of the Constitution of the United States of America for a prosecutor to tell her constituents someone is guilty PRIOR TO THE TRIAL/INQUIRY/ or whatever it is she plans to make herself a popular Democrat at the expense of an innocent man she has labeled as guilty before the trial. The woman is lower than snake snot in her practice of the law.

 

[BackAgain]

And Fanni Willis’s point is true. If Jim didn’t pass the Bar he never practiced law.

I don’t dispute that he didn’t practice law if he don’t pass a bar.

Or, if he did, it would have been a crime.

But so what? Jordan has a perfectly valid Federally based right to see if there has been a coordination or state and federal prosecutions for partisan political reasons. And, if so, heads should roll.

Does he also have an equally legit right to seek any of her “case” evidence? That is a different matter. I’d say no.

But her reply to Rep. Jordan was still unprofessional.

 

[beautress]

Please cite the specific amendment in which a prosecutor is forbidden from saying whom they ware going get. The specific part of the Constitution, the specific clause and/amendment.

As often as you people shouted, "LOCK HER UP", with no real grounds for doing so, you must know how wrong you are. HRC broke no law, you people announcing you were going to her, how exactly is that different.

You have no idea of what you are talking about and it shows.

"lock her up" That is something I did not say. How does it feel to lie about a person who did not do what you broadly blamed them for something they did not say? You deserve to be ignored by intelligent citizens.

 

[0311]

My opinion

So you do NOT have facts, all you have is an opinion. Under U.S. Law is legal to announce the target of an investigation. Your opinion means nothing when it comes to the actual facts.

Opinions are like asshole b, everybody has one and yours just plain stinks.

 

[BackAgain]

So you do NOT have facts, all you have is an opinion. Under U.S. Law is legal to announce the target of an investigation. Your opinion means nothing when it comes to the actual facts.

Opinions are like asshole b, everybody has one and yours just plain stinks.

This is why you’re recognized as being an asshole.

 

[Mashmont]

I will just remind folks that Mashmont is a "Christian" extremist who lies. Willis is not financed by Soros. She graduated from accredited institutions of higher education. Her comments were online with Jordan's numbskullery.

Mashmont lied saying the she implied Jordan had failed the bar. She pointed out, instead, that he never took it and gave him advice on how to do so.

Mashmont is a trump financed stooge.

Quote from the article: " Willis made a point of reminding the blustery Ohio Republican that he never passed the bar after attending law school"
Falsely implies Jordan failed the bar exam. She lied. As did you.

 

[beautress]

No, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.

Trump tried to weaponize the Presidency and now is attempt to do so with his campaign. So far he is failing.

She will convict Trump. She will become a Senator. Trump will be remanded into federal custody.

President Trump is innocent in all the Democrat charges that he has endured for four full years of his presidency. He was found innocent in a House inquiry. He was found innocent in a Senate inquiry. He was found innocent of wrongdoing in the Mueller investigation. Nancy Pelosi and her gang tried to impeach Donald Trump, and it failed. When they realized he could win another election, Nancy impeached him again, and her egregious hatred and the second impeachment failed. Then Nancy decided to make sure that Trump got bad press by making sure he would not send hundreds of

No, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.

Trump tried to weaponize the Presidency and now is attempt to do so with his campaign. So far he is failing.

She will convict Trump. She will become a Senator. Trump will be remanded into federal custody.

This is nothing but a partisan hit, and Fani Willis even orchestrated the timing of his kangaroo court trial for the significant dates in the upcoming Election in which Trump is running. When they get done with her hearing for interfering with a Presidential election, Fani Willis will be at rock bottom. And that's what I think.

Oh, and Article III, Section 1 does mention not only the supreme court, but also other levels of the judiciary with this introduction:

"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour"​

​

I'm not repeating her failure to recuse herself as it is in one of the the above videos that I furnished for you and others, Mr. Slow Horses. IMHO between that egregious break with behaviors required of a judicial appointment of District Attorney in the State of Georgia, and her cherry picking inconvenient dates to destroy Donald Trump's run for office, which she told her pals how proud she was of herself for treating President Trump to a finger printing, photo shooting his face for records of criminal suspects, etc. I have no words for the manner in which she has zero respect for the Constitution of the United States of America with re to the judiciary side of a state's DA. ​

​

​

 

[Mashmont]

Next up: Jordan responds to Willis' false attacks, to which Willis plays the victimhood/racist/sexist card. This is the MO for all far-left Soros-financed unqualified shills. AOC, David Hogg, Greta Thuneberg. They say extremely nasty and provocative things, then when responded to, retreat to victimhood.

 

[Crepitus]

On Thursday, the prosecutor who indicted Donald Trump and 18 alleged co-conspirators on racketeering charges (RICO) slapped down Jordan's attempts to "interfere" with her investigation, and curtly explained to him that he has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to the law – even accusing him of spreading "misinformation."

With regard to her filing under the RICO statute, Willis made a point of reminding the blustery Ohio Republican that he never passed the bar after attending law school, writing that he can still continue his education by purchasing legal expert John Floyd's RICO book "for the non-bar member price of $249."

'This is how it's done': Legal experts applaud Fani Willis for sending Jim Jordan 'to the showers'

Social media legal experts piled on Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis fired off a multi-page letter to the House Judiciary chairman, essentially telling him to butt out of her investigation into tampering in the 2020 presidential election.On Thursday, the...

www.rawstory.com

I read that, it was a pretty scathing takedown.

 

[skews13]

I read that, it was a pretty scathing takedown.

Yes. Apparently conservatives don't believe in states rights anymore. Jordan isn't even good at his own job. If he's even intelligent enough to read RICO laws. He should then read a book on Federalism.

 

[beautress]

And Fanni Willis’s point is true. If Jim didn’t pass the Bar he never practiced law.

Ohio's representative, Juris Doctor James Daniel Jordan, has a doctorate of the Law that tells his mistaken protagonist doesn't know what she's talking about, because he knows all that stuff, and he knows she is gaslighting in the most manipulative way. The Constitution does encourage employees of the lower courts must also be of good character. Her egregious political shenannigans of going after President Trump with political planning and her screwing a person she failed to recuse herself from in a court case, is pretty telling she hasn't the character nor the behavior and is unfit to serve the great state of Georgia. I hope their dismissal of her targeted hatred against President Trump removes her for going against the Constitution with her egregious and underhanded double-dealings.

Article III, Section 1 does mention not only the supreme court, but also other levels of the judiciary with this introduction:

"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the
Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts,
shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour"​

I'm not repeating her failure to recuse herself as it is in one of the the above videos that I furnished for you and others, Mr. Slow Horses. IMHO between that egregious break with behaviors required of a judicial appointment of District Attorney in the State of Georgia, and her cherry picking inconvenient dates to destroy Donald Trump's run for office, which she told her pals how proud she was of herself for treating President Trump to a finger printing, photo shooting his face for records of criminal suspects, etc. I have no words for the manner in which she has zero respect for the Constitution of the United States of America with re to the judiciary side of a state's DA.

The only thing worse than a criminal is a corrupt DA who is weaponizing the judiciary office she holds against an innocent human, and she well knows that President Trump did not break with the law, although her actions ignore the Constitution's insistence that inferior court employees are held to by their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution and be fair.

She has no intention of being fair to President Trump whom she has treated as a personal enemy. The very utilization of the Rico Law against President Trump by definition indicates racketeering and corrupt organizations. That kind of proven lie in and of itself is horrifying. President Trump has been put through the grinder by an out of control hateful political party that pushes socialism/communist Marxism to be America's future. One of the most respected Presidents of all time, Ike Eisenhower, requested the Congress to pass the Anticommunist law of 1954. No Congress has ever used the law, but it may have to if the Democrat Party doesn't allow their adversaries to use free speech. They think "Freedom of speech is for me, but not for thee."

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Quote from the article: " Willis made a point of reminding the blustery Ohio Republican that he never passed the bar after attending law school"
Falsely implies Jordan failed the bar exam. She lied. As did you.

She said he had not taken the bar, not that he had not passed it. You, a false Christian like Ordinary Guy, are lying.