progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 67,879
- 42,688
- 2,615
that sounds like a surrender to me,,I have to admire you, arguing about anatomy when you know nothing about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that sounds like a surrender to me,,I have to admire you, arguing about anatomy when you know nothing about it.
Attacking me or defending him?that sounds like a surrender to me,,
Attacking me or defending him?
I know some things about anatomy, but can't tell if Lucy was really an APE-HUMAN that could WALK UPRIGHT as you claimed. Now, you're backing down and admitting that you just made up sh*t in your head to back your evolutionary false beliefs. She doesn't even look to have feet.I have to admire you, arguing about anatomy when you know nothing about it.
What you know about anatomy from creationer ministries amounts to very little.I know some things about anatomy, but can't tell if Lucy was really an APE-HUMAN that could WALK UPRIGHT as you claimed. Now, you're backing down and admitting that you just made up sh*t in your head to back your evolutionary false beliefs. She doesn't even look to have feet.
Shouldn't you be criticizing alang1216 for how he knew Lucy walked perfectly upright for a chimpanz... oops, I mean ape-human, when we don't really know about her feet nor her legs. Look at her knuckles. Oh, those are missing, too. What do scientists agree about Lucy from the neck up? That she was an ape!What you know about anatomy from creationer ministries amounts to very little.
Ask him about the foramen magnum and see if I attacked him or stated fact.neither,,
since you went to personal attacks instead of sticking with reality and facts thats the same as a surrender,,
You may know somethings about anatomy but certainly not everything. Of course none of us do but what sets you apart is your lack of interest in learning more.I know some things about anatomy, but can't tell if Lucy was really an APE-HUMAN that could WALK UPRIGHT as you claimed. Now, you're backing down and admitting that you just made up sh*t in your head to back your evolutionary false beliefs. She doesn't even look to have feet.
With Lucy, we do not get to anatomy anymore. I think you were wrong, wrong, wrong about Lucy walking perfectly upright. What has happened is Lucy has become a myth. Scientists are denying she was ape-human today, but her myth as ape-human instead of an ape will continue on.You may know somethings about anatomy but certainly not everything. Of course none of us do but what sets you apart is your lack of interest in learning more.
More of your hysterical tirades.Shouldn't you be criticizing alang1216 for how he knew Lucy walked perfectly upright for a chimpanz... oops, I mean ape-human, when we don't really know about her feet nor her legs. Look at her knuckles. Oh, those are missing, too. What do scientists agree about Lucy from the neck up? That she was an ape!
In reality, she's been debunked as an ape-human, but has turned into a legendary myth of being the first ape-human. It's no wonder we have no history for humans except that from the Bible.
Specious opinion.With Lucy, we do not get to anatomy anymore. I think you were wrong, wrong, wrong about Lucy walking perfectly upright. What has happened is Lucy has become a myth. Scientists are denying she was ape-human today, but her myth as ape-human instead of an ape will continue on.
The science says she walked upright. It is not a guess, it is not faith, it is not wishful thinking. It is the anatomy of her scull and that doesn't lie.With Lucy, we do not get to anatomy anymore. I think you were wrong, wrong, wrong about Lucy walking perfectly upright.
I see you've given up on the science. No anthropologist would ever use the term ape-human, it is scientifically meaningless, only an evolution denier would use it.What has happened is Lucy has become a myth. Scientists are denying she was ape-human today, but her myth as ape-human instead of an ape will continue on.
her skull has nothing to do with her feet more so when they dont even exist, not to mention theres no proof the legs or hips are even hers,,,The science says she walked upright. It is not a guess, it is not faith, it is not wishful thinking. It is the anatomy of her scull and that doesn't lie.
I see you've given up on the science. No anthropologist would ever use the term ape-human, it is scientifically meaningless, only an evolution denier would use it.
No, it's fact now. Even alang1216 claimed Lucy walked perfectly upright when her skeleton/fossil had no legs and maybe part of a foot. He thought she was ape-human when all scientists say now that she was a chimpanzee above her neck.Specious opinion.
It's skull and all the scientists, both creation and atheist, have agreed the skull is that of a chimpanzee.It is the anatomy of her scull and that doesn't lie.
Another poster displaying their ignorance of anatomy. Here's a refresher:her skull has nothing to do with her feet more so when they dont even exist, not to mention theres no proof the legs or hips are even hers,,,
Of that I was unaware. Got a link to 'atheist' scientists who believe that?It's skull and all the scientists, both creation and atheist, have agreed the skull is that of a chimpanzee.
Thats funny.No, it's fact now. Even alang1216 claimed Lucy walked perfectly upright when her skeleton/fossil had no legs and maybe part of a foot. He thought she was ape-human when all scientists say now that she was a chimpanzee above her neck.
I guess the search is on for a new and better Lucy, but the "Lucy myth" lives on. The lie and myth became "Lucy walked perfectly upright." When I questioned alang1216, he could do nothing but babble when I confronted him with a photo of Lucy's remains.
This is a GLORIOUS DAY for james bond on USMB!!!
Just look in the mirror. You haven't explained Lucy yet and are the perfect example. It means you are caught up with the Lucy myth and your brain cannot process current science. You are stuck in 1974 when her skeleton/fossil was found.Of that I was unaware. Got a link to 'atheist' scientists who believe that?
Just look in the mirror. You haven't explained Lucy yet and are the perfect example. It means you are caught up with the Lucy myth and your brain cannot process current science. You are stuck in 1974 when her skeleton/fossil was found.
All I can do is bring you up to speed of 2020 -- https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2020/04/01/Ancient-human-relative-Lucys-brain-was-surprisingly-ape-like/3981585757321/