Fake Fossils Bring Big Money

[james bond]

The teaching ministry of Bill Nugent?

Thats embarrassing.

If Lucy had an ape-like brain, then she was a chimp. You need to read the articles. Here's another.

"Lucy, which lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago in Africa, is thought to be a close relative of the Homo genus, which includes modern humans. But new research suggests Australopithecus afarensis had a surprisingly ape-like brain."

Ancient human relative Lucy's brain was surprisingly ape-like - UPI.com

Lucy is thought to be a close relative of the Homo genus, which includes modern humans, but new research suggests Australopithecus afarensis had a surprisingly ape-like brain.

www.upi.com

 

[Hollie]

If Lucy had an ape-like brain, then she was a chimp. You need to read the articles. Here's another.

"Lucy, which lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago in Africa, is thought to be a close relative of the Homo genus, which includes modern humans. But new research suggests Australopithecus afarensis had a surprisingly ape-like brain."

Ancient human relative Lucy's brain was surprisingly ape-like - UPI.com

Lucy is thought to be a close relative of the Homo genus, which includes modern humans, but new research suggests Australopithecus afarensis had a surprisingly ape-like brain.

www.upi.com

This is why creationers have no business in science matters.

 

[alang1216]

Just look in the mirror. You haven't explained Lucy yet and are the perfect example. It means you are caught up with the Lucy myth and your brain cannot process current science. You are stuck in 1974 when her skeleton/fossil was found.

All I can do is bring you up to speed of 2020 -- https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2020/04/01/Ancient-human-relative-Lucys-brain-was-surprisingly-ape-like/3981585757321/

So I am the most authoritative 'atheist' scientists who believe that "the skull is that of a chimpanzee"? Well I never said that because I don't believe it.

You said "Both creation and atheist, have agreed the skull is that of a chimpanzee" yet you offer no support. Did you lie?

 

[alang1216]

If Lucy had an ape-like brain, then she was a chimp.

Doubling down? Like Archaeopteryx, Lucy had features of two different groups. Easy to explain for evolutionists, both were transitional forms.

 

[progressive hunter]

Doubling down? Like Archaeopteryx, Lucy had features of two different groups. Easy to explain for evolutionists, both were transitional forms.

or most likely they were two different animals,,

 

[alang1216]

or most likely they were two different animals,,

So when did Archaeopteryx, and first Lucy appear on Earth? Were they there from the beginning of the appearance of life or were they 'created' more recently?

 

[progressive hunter]

So when did Archaeopteryx, and first Lucy appear on Earth? Were they there from the beginning of the appearance of life or were they 'created' more recently?

no one really knows since we werent there to observe it,,
and really doesnt have anything to do with what I said,,

 

[Hollie]

no one really knows since we werent there to observe it,,
and really doesnt have anything to do with what I said,,

''We'' actually do know that Archaeopteryx is not a recent creation by supernatural means. It's concerning you're confused about that.

 

[alang1216]

no one really knows since we werent there to observe it,,
and really doesnt have anything to do with what I said,,

Now you're just being modest, you know the answer even though you weren't there to observe it,, You said, "most likely they were two different animals". So which is the truth, no one really knows or you do "most likely"? I'm getting the distinct feeling you're just making stuff up as you go.

 

[progressive hunter]

Now you're just being modest, you know the answer even though you weren't there to observe it,, You said, "most likely they were two different animals". So which is the truth, no one really knows or you do "most likely"? I'm getting the distinct feeling you're just making stuff up as you go.

I am doing just like the guys that found lucy are doing,, guessing,
the difference is mine makes more sense,,

 

[alang1216]

I am doing just like the guys that found lucy are doing,, guessing,
the difference is mine makes more sense,,

I have to admire your ego and arrogance. Equating your 'guess' with the work of professional anthropologists in peer-reviewed literature.

 

[progressive hunter]

I have to admire your ego and arrogance. Equating your 'guess' with the work of professional anthropologists in peer-reviewed literature.

doesnt mean theyre right,, and more so with all the flaws in their guess,,,

takes a big imagination to come up with what they came up with,,

 

[alang1216]

doesnt mean theyre right,, and more so with all the flaws in their guess,,,

takes a big imagination to come up with what they came up with,,

Of course. Choosing between professional anthropologists and an anonymous internet poster is a tough call. I mean they only have evidence and peer-reviewed publications on their side while you have opinions and assertions without any facts. Who would you trust in my place?

 

[progressive hunter]

Of course. Choosing between professional anthropologists and an anonymous internet poster is a tough call. I mean they only have evidence and peer-reviewed publications on their side while you have opinions and assertions without any facts. Who would you trust in my place?

peer reviewed is only used when the evidence cant speak for itself,,

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

peer reviewed is only used when the evidence cant speak for itself,,

You don't appear to know anything about what peer review is.

 

[progressive hunter]

You don't appear to know anything about what peer review is.

if the evidence could speak for itself peer review isnt needed,,

and the evidence for lucy is beyond laughable,,,

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

if the evidence could speak for itself peer review isnt needed,,

That isn't how peer review works.

and the evidence for lucy is beyond laughable,,,

If you don't even understand the basics of scientific publication then why would you think you understood paleoanthropology?

 

[progressive hunter]

That isn't how peer review works.



If you don't even understand the basics of scientific publication then why would you think you understood paleoanthropology?

you do know theres peer review saying lucy and many other evo claims are fakes or made up dont you???

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

you do know theres peer review saying lucy and many other evo claims are fakes or made up dont you???

I am not aware of that. Care to cite some?

 

[progressive hunter]

I am not aware of that. Care to cite some?

not really,,

there are many scientist that dispute it and use the evidence to explain why,,
problem is you would ignore them because they are creationist and not one of your selected sources,,