Factory construction booming under Joe!

Hummm.....I tend to believe that a law passed less than a year ago is suddenly leading to new factories everywhere. It takes a fair amount of lead time to build a new manufacturing plant given businesses still have to shop around for the location that gives them the most perks to build there. I know that some of the new local projects being built now had their starts delayed due to inflation/worker shortages last year as well. I suspect part of this has to do with the trade war with China El Orange Heffe started.


Does building bio labs in China and Ukraine with US taxdollars count as "American factory construction?"
 
The one under W. Fiscal conservatives and libertarians both warned that Cheney was wrong (imagine that) and that deficits DO MATTER and that all the big government spending under W would end up in a disaster, and it did.

But it wasn't deficits that undone us....they were just more evidence of the abysmal failure of Supply Side.
 
Does building bio labs in China and Ukraine with US taxdollars count as "American factory construction?"
depends on who gets employment there EMH.....

1686483307831.jpeg

~S~
 
Does building bio labs in China and Ukraine with US taxdollars count as "American factory construction?"

Not that I know of but that really is neither here nor there. One of our industrial parks has been the finalist for several huge new build-outs only to miss out in the end for whatever reason including for a electric vehicle plant and a car battery factory. There is a lot of competition when it comes to these type projects so they don't happen overnight. There is also the issue of what are these new places replacing if anything. For instance a new factory in a nearby town that is just now going into production will ultimately replace two factories by the same company in two other places. Here in Virginia, there are several casino build outs in various phases of planning or construction. Whether building casinos in poor areas is a net positive for society it debatable but they are construction jobs.
 
But it wasn't deficits that undone us....they were just more evidence of the abysmal failure of Supply Side.


The only time we practiced SUPPLY SIDE was when Clinton was forced to sign Gingrich's budgets which CUT TAXES AND SPENDING

Result= surplus and booming economy with low end wage inflation


Now, your side takes credit for that even as it was 180 degrees from what your side supported at the time and all the time...
 
The only time we practiced SUPPLY SIDE was when Clinton was forced to sign Gingrich's budgets which CUT TAXES AND SPENDING

Result= surplus and booming economy with low end wage inflation


Now, your side takes credit for that even as it was 180 degrees from what your side supported at the time and all the time...
You haven't the vaguest idea.

Let me illustrate.

When Newt and Elvis came to agreement, how much of the deficit Elvis inherited from Supply Side remained?

(As a percentage of the FY 1993 deficit)
 
You haven't the vaguest idea.

Let me illustrate.

When Newt and Elvis came to agreement, how much of the deficit Elvis inherited from Supply Side remained?

(As a percentage of the FY 1993 deficit)


This is what your side really did in 1995...



the GOP Congress passed a budget that cut spending and taxes


The Dems flipped out and shut the government down demanding more spending. They never got it...


And now they claim the result was the "Clinton economy"


What the DATA shows is that AMERICA PROSPERS when taxes AND SPENDING ARE BOTH CUT


What Democrats want is 180 degrees the opposite
 
his isn't the first time America has 'bought' it's way out of a depression

Except we aren't in a Depression, and those companies got fat for years off of labor racketeering and off-shore money laundering scams. They don't need the subsidies or the tax breaks.
 
What the DATA shows is that AMERICA PROSPERS when taxes AND SPENDING ARE BOTH CUT

No, it doesn't. Concentration of financial and industrial wealth funnels all of the gains to the top 1-3%. 'America' just gets bled dry for the most part, like every other banana republic.
 
No, it doesn't. Concentration of financial and industrial wealth funnels all of the gains to the top 1-3%. 'America' just gets bled dry for the most part, like every other banana republic.


Complete bullshit. Low end wage inflation takes care of that. The US must be competitive with other countries without using subsidies. The COST OF GOVERNMENT is the problem. It is too high. It needs to be cut.

Completely cut

Co2 fraud
states without vouchers get no Education money
foreign bio labs (an RFKjr policy - cut that kickback loaded treason OUT)
State Department (we do not need to fund drag queen shows in South America)
Massive HHS/NIH cuts
subsidies for businesses related to Co2 fraud


The way back to American prosperity is to cut government spending back to 25% of GDP
 
China has won. It's only the lead we had in technology, old money, and what is more important...location in the world that pads our number one status at this point. Look at the massive irritation of us and Cuba for over 65 years. One small island state. China has Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines as irritations. And issues with India. Why? Location. And they are enroute to becoming the number one nation in the world. We are promoting people who live in the shadows of what once red-light districts as our superiors domestically.
 

Forum List

Back
Top