Explosive intervention by Pope Francis set to transform climate change debate

[Socialist]

We reject this Marxist "Pope"

The pope is certainly not a marxist, and even if he was, he is simply someone who holds a worldview based on dialectical materialism, again, marxism is just a worldview, unless you refer to marxism-leninism,Maoism,etc..

"Marxism is just a world view?" So was Nazism, numskull.

Marxism is a worldview, many modern marxists find their homes in university settings, and nazism is a worldview, until someone acts on it. There is nothing to act on within marxism unless you go towards its extensions.

1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.
​

I assume you're grabbing from one of Marx's writings to particular groups at the time, which is not anything to do with the worldview of marxism focusing on a materialistic examination of history.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Your entire little rant lacks any logical basis in reality

And with that, your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Reader, what you just witnessed is a self professed homosexual declaring that human physiology lacks any basis in reality.

Which is homosexuality, advising you that it dies not exist within reality.

Now, when the next person comes along and tells you about how the APA removed homosexuality from any affiliation with mental disorder, that you witnessed a self professed homosexual advise you that in its reality, Human physiology is not a consideration.

Which means that human physiological development would not be a consideration; which means that sexual cravings that may be manifested for any individual at any stage of human development would be fair game, because the standards associated with the reality that human physiology DOES exist, would not be relevant...

Now... knowing that, re-read the argument:

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy.

The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, to the point that they, say... crave sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, would be limited to such, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homo-sexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible deviations from the human sexual standard... . Therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drawn no line between normality and the antithesis of such... ergo; they could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

 

[Socialist]

Your entire little rant lacks any logical basis in reality

And with that, your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Reader, what you just witnessed is a self professed homosexual declaring that human physiology lacks any basis in reality.

Which is homosexuality, advising you that it dies not exist within reality.

Now, when the next person comes along and tells you about how the APA removed homosexuality from any affiliation with mental disorder, that you witnessed a self professed homosexual advise you that in its reality, Human physiology is not a consideration.

Which means that human physiological development would not be a consideration; which means that sexual cravings that may be manifested for any individual at any stage of human development would be fair game, because the standards associated with the reality that human physiology DOES exist, would not be relevant...

Now... knowing that, re-read the argument:

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy.

The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, to the point that they, say... crave sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, would be limited to such, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homo-sexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible deviations from the human sexual standard... . Therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drawn no line between normality and the antithesis of such... ergo; they could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

HAHAHAHHA. What the fuck is wrong with you? No wonder the right wing is losing credibility.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Democratic socialist, not once in that post did I admit I was a communist, however, if socialism did lead to communism, nothing wrong with that.

Well there ya go... now you HAVE admit to being a communist.

So that was the last time that you could truthfully claim that you have never admitted you are a communist.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Your entire little rant lacks any logical basis in reality

And with that, your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Reader, what you just witnessed is a self professed homosexual declaring that human physiology lacks any basis in reality.

Which is homosexuality, advising you that it dies not exist within reality.

Now, when the next person comes along and tells you about how the APA removed homosexuality from any affiliation with mental disorder, that you witnessed a self professed homosexual advise you that in its reality, Human physiology is not a consideration.

Which means that human physiological development would not be a consideration; which means that sexual cravings that may be manifested for any individual at any stage of human development would be fair game, because the standards associated with the reality that human physiology DOES exist, would not be relevant...

Now... knowing that, re-read the argument:

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy.

The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, to the point that they, say... crave sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, would be limited to such, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homo-sexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible deviations from the human sexual standard... . Therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drawn no line between normality and the antithesis of such... ergo; they could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

HAHAHAHHA. What the fuck is wrong with you? No wonder the right wing is losing credibility.

Delusion: an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder

 

[Socialist]

Democratic socialist, not once in that post did I admit I was a communist, however, if socialism did lead to communism, nothing wrong with that.

Well there ya go... now you HAVE admit to being a communist.

So that was the last time that you could truthfully claim that you have never admitted you are a communist.

No, I really do not, if communism, by it's actual definition, was achievable, (One can argue it was in catalonia/the free ukraine) I am all for it, however, I am a realistic person examining the conditions that are present.

 

[Socialist]

Your entire little rant lacks any logical basis in reality

And with that, your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Reader, what you just witnessed is a self professed homosexual declaring that human physiology lacks any basis in reality.

Which is homosexuality, advising you that it dies not exist within reality.

Now, when the next person comes along and tells you about how the APA removed homosexuality from any affiliation with mental disorder, that you witnessed a self professed homosexual advise you that in its reality, Human physiology is not a consideration.

Which means that human physiological development would not be a consideration; which means that sexual cravings that may be manifested for any individual at any stage of human development would be fair game, because the standards associated with the reality that human physiology DOES exist, would not be relevant...

Now... knowing that, re-read the argument:

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy.

The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, to the point that they, say... crave sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, would be limited to such, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homo-sexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible deviations from the human sexual standard... . Therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drawn no line between normality and the antithesis of such... ergo; they could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

HAHAHAHHA. What the fuck is wrong with you? No wonder the right wing is losing credibility.

Delusion: an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder

Homophobia:

1. dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people.

 

[Stephanie]

What's he gonna do? Part the Red Sea?

He's going to call on catholics and others to realize the reality of climate change and the growing worldwide inequality.

ah, so the AGENDA behind Globull warming shows itself. The pope has Billions he should spread the wealth on those in the worldwide inequality. and you should go help him

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Democratic socialist, not once in that post did I admit I was a communist, however, if socialism did lead to communism, nothing wrong with that.

Well there ya go... now you HAVE admit to being a communist.

So that was the last time that you could truthfully claim that you have never admitted you are a communist.

No, I really do not, if communism, by it's actual definition, was achievable, (One can argue it was in catalonia/the free ukraine) I am all for it, however, I am a realistic person examining the conditions that are present.

Communism has been achieved repeatedly... you just can't find the strength of courage to admit it, because the consequences of communism are the same as the consequences of evil...

But hey, that's only because communism is a manifestation of evil.

 

[Stephanie]

I'm starting to like this pope more and more..

Pope Francis will call for an ethical and economic revolution to prevent catastrophic climate change and growing inequality in a letter to the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics on Thursday.

In an unprecedented encyclical on the subject of the environment, the pontiff is expected to argue that humanity’s exploitation of the planet’s resources has crossed the Earth’s natural boundaries, and that the world faces ruin without a revolution in hearts and minds. The much-anticipated message, which will be sent to the world’s 5,000 Catholic bishops, will be published online in five languages on Thursday and is expected to be the most radical statement yet from the outspoken pontiff.

However, it is certain to anger sections of Republican opinion in America by endorsing the warnings of climate scientists and admonishing rich elites, say cardinals and scientists who have advised the Vatican.

The Ghanaian cardinal, Peter Turkson, president of the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and a close ally of the pope, will launch the encyclical. He has said it will address the root causes of poverty and the threats facing nature, or “creation”.

In a recent speech widely regarded as a curtain-raiser to the encyclical, Turkson said: “Much of the world remains in poverty, despite abundant resources, while a privileged global elite controls the bulk of the world’s wealth and consumes the bulk of its resources.”

The Argentinian pontiff is expected to repeat calls for a change in attitudes to poverty and nature. “An economic system centred on the god of money needs to plunder nature to sustain the frenetic rhythm of consumption that is inherent to it,” he told a meeting of social movements last year. “I think a question that we are not asking ourselves is: isn’t humanity committing suicide with this indiscriminate and tyrannical use of nature? Safeguard creation because, if we destroy it, it will destroy us. Never forget this.”

Explosive intervention by Pope Francis set to transform climate change debate Environment The Guardian

Huh... So The Catholics embrace of Homosexuality worked out for them, that they felt that why shouldn't they embrace Communism?

ROFLMNAO!

Oh that's BRILLIANT!

(Catholics... here's what ya need to understand.

Do ya recall how it went when you embraced homosexuality? And the homosexuals ended up raping thousands of the children who the were trusted with? And do ya remember how when that all came out, that the homosexual cult BLAMED THOSE RAPES UPON CATHOLICISM... denying any responsibility on the mental disorder that presents as sexual deviancy.

Well when this little trip into the ideological swamp comes around to bite ya in the collective ass... you need to understand that the communists (in which the Homo-cult camps) WILL BLAME YOU FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF COMMUNISM.

If you can't understand THAT, then you deserve the ass beating you're setting yourself up for.)

Could you please stop ranting ...

ROFLMNAO!

Oh thank you. I SO adore the sweeter ironies.

I don't tend to rant, and if I do, I am sure to be rational.

You don't? every other post in this thread is YOURS
rant rant rant rant

 

[Socialist]

Democratic socialist, not once in that post did I admit I was a communist, however, if socialism did lead to communism, nothing wrong with that.

Well there ya go... now you HAVE admit to being a communist.

So that was the last time that you could truthfully claim that you have never admitted you are a communist.

No, I really do not, if communism, by it's actual definition, was achievable, (One can argue it was in catalonia/the free ukraine) I am all for it, however, I am a realistic person examining the conditions that are present.

Communism has been achieved repeatedly... you just can't find the strength of courage to admit it, because the consequences of communism are the same as the consequences of evil...

But hey, that's only because communism is a manifestation of evil.

Show me these stateless societies with unlimited surplus, lack of social classes, and a lack of money. I'm waiting.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Your entire little rant lacks any logical basis in reality

And with that, your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Reader, what you just witnessed is a self professed homosexual declaring that human physiology lacks any basis in reality.

Which is homosexuality, advising you that it dies not exist within reality.

Now, when the next person comes along and tells you about how the APA removed homosexuality from any affiliation with mental disorder, that you witnessed a self professed homosexual advise you that in its reality, Human physiology is not a consideration.

Which means that human physiological development would not be a consideration; which means that sexual cravings that may be manifested for any individual at any stage of human development would be fair game, because the standards associated with the reality that human physiology DOES exist, would not be relevant...

Now... knowing that, re-read the argument:

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy.

The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, to the point that they, say... crave sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, would be limited to such, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homo-sexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible deviations from the human sexual standard... . Therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drawn no line between normality and the antithesis of such... ergo; they could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

HAHAHAHHA. What the fuck is wrong with you? No wonder the right wing is losing credibility.

Delusion: an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder

Homophobia:

1. a colloquial pretense; a deceptive means to cow opposition of the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality; a farcical dissemblance with no basis in science, designed to appear as an objective scientific term; a fraudulent coercion, which seeks to influence children and fools to believe as truth, that which is otherwise false.

 

[Socialist]

Your entire little rant lacks any logical basis in reality

And with that, your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Reader, what you just witnessed is a self professed homosexual declaring that human physiology lacks any basis in reality.

Which is homosexuality, advising you that it dies not exist within reality.

Now, when the next person comes along and tells you about how the APA removed homosexuality from any affiliation with mental disorder, that you witnessed a self professed homosexual advise you that in its reality, Human physiology is not a consideration.

Which means that human physiological development would not be a consideration; which means that sexual cravings that may be manifested for any individual at any stage of human development would be fair game, because the standards associated with the reality that human physiology DOES exist, would not be relevant...

Now... knowing that, re-read the argument:

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy.

The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, to the point that they, say... crave sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, would be limited to such, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homo-sexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible deviations from the human sexual standard... . Therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drawn no line between normality and the antithesis of such... ergo; they could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

HAHAHAHHA. What the fuck is wrong with you? No wonder the right wing is losing credibility.

Delusion: an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder

Homophobia:

1. a colloquial pretense; a deceptive means to cow opposition of the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality; a farcical dissemblance with no basis in science, designed to appear as an objective scientific term; a fraudulent coercion, which seeks to influence children and fools to believe as truth, that which is otherwise false.

Oh dear lord..

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Show me these stateless societies with unlimited surplus, lack of social classes, and a lack of money. I'm waiting.

So you want me to show you a utopian fiction, which exist only in the feckless imagination of children and fools?

ROFLMNAO!

Delusion: an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder.

 

[Socialist]

Show me these stateless societies with unlimited surplus, lack of social classes, and a lack of money. I'm waiting.

So you want me to show you a utopian fiction, which exist only in the feckless imagination of children and fools?

ROFLMNAO!

Delusion: an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder.

Hey, I'm going off of the definition of communism, it's what he wanted. What is it with you and your hatred of homosexuals anyways?

 

[Dragonlady]

What's he gonna do? Part the Red Sea?

He's going to call on catholics and others to realize the reality of climate change and the growing worldwide inequality.

So the pope is a climate expert?

Yes the Pope is a climate expert. He has a Phd in chemistry, one of the climate change disciplines. He's certainly more qualified to discuss climate change than Ted Cruz and the rest of the mob in the Republican clown car.

Just because a person recognizes the problems created by the high rates of poverty the world over doesn't mean they're a communist. He's not advocating overthrow of the capitalist system, or collective ownership of the means of production.

Not that the ignorant, low information right wingers in this forum would know or understand the difference. Just drink your faux News koolaid and tell yourselves the bubble is fine.

 

[Socialist]

What's he gonna do? Part the Red Sea?

He's going to call on catholics and others to realize the reality of climate change and the growing worldwide inequality.

So the pope is a climate expert?

Yes the Pope is a climate expert. He has a Phd in chemistry, one of the climate change disciplines. He's certainly more qualified to discuss climate change than Ted Cruz and the rest of the mob in the Republican clown car.

Just because a person recognizes the problems created by the high rates of poverty the world over doesn't mean they're a communist. He's not advocating overthrow of the capitalist system, or collective ownership of the means of production.

Not that the ignorant, low information right wingers in this forum would know or understand the difference. Just drink your faux News koolaid and tell yourselves the bubble is fine.

This is the part where we both get personally attacked.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What's he gonna do? Part the Red Sea?

He's going to call on catholics and others to realize the reality of climate change and the growing worldwide inequality.

So the pope is a climate expert?

Yes the Pope is a climate expert. He has a Phd in chemistry, one of the climate change disciplines. He's certainly more qualified to discuss climate change than Ted Cruz and the rest of the mob in the Republican clown car.

Just because a person recognizes the problems created by the high rates of poverty the world over doesn't mean they're a communist. He's not advocating overthrow of the capitalist system, or collective ownership of the means of production.

Not that the ignorant, low information right wingers in this forum would know or understand the difference. Just drink your faux News koolaid and tell yourselves the bubble is fine.

Wow!! So now you support religion/
And just because the guy has a chem degree doesnt mean he's a climate expert.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Reader, do you see why socialism has failed everywhere it has ever attempted?

The adherents to such are deluded. With little to no kinship with reality.

What's more, this self professed homosexual claims adherence to socialist notions, despite each communist experiment in human history, having used these poor creatures to acquire power and having murdered them by the gross, upon the acquisition of power.

It's a delusion seeking the deluded... a form of mass hysteria... a form of dark energy which has historically been referred to as simply: Evil.

Now, ask yourself: what aspect of the Ideological Left can you site, which does not support debauched perversion... in one form or another. Ask yourself if there is ANY idea advanced by socialism which in any way serves sound principle and the viable interest of the individual.

Then ask yourself what form of energy it is that rejects sound principle and exists purely upon deceit and fraud as a means to influence the lowest possible cultural denominator.

 

[tinydancer]

One of Pope Francis's key advisers is Bishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo. He's a marxist.

Currently he is the Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.

One has to always remember how left wing this Pope is. And he surrounds himself with other very left wingers. Cripes he's influenced by an extreme alarmist, Professor John Schnellnhuber, founding director of the Postdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.

This one is so whacked out that he wants an Earth Constitution.

Let that sink in because it's so one worlder it's off the charts crazy but this lunatic advises Angela Merkel as well. Doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy at all.

This Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter. He wants to put in place a Global Council that would be elected by all the people of the earth.

AND set up a Planetary Court that could handle violations of the Earth Constitution.

YOWZAH!